Testing and motivation for learning

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 169-207

  Harlen, Wynne ^a   Deakin Crick, Ruth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066226275     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594032000121270     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. 1997. Learner-Centred Principles: a framework Jar school reform and redesign, Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
2. AMES, C., 1990a. Motivation: what teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91: 409–421.
3. AMES, C., Developing a learning orientation. Paper presented at annual meeting of the AERA. April16-20, Boston.
4. AMES, C., 1992. Classrooms: goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84: 261–271.
5. ARG. 2002. Testing Motivation and Learning, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.
6. BELL, D., Reporting England--Speech to the City of York Council's annual education conference. February. OfSTED News (www.ofsted.gov.uk/news)
7. BLACK, P., 1993. Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21: 49–97.
8. BLACK, P., and WILIAM, D., 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1): 7–74.
9. BROADFOOT, P., and POLLARD, A., 2000. “ The changing discourse of assessment policy: the case of English primary education ”. In Assessment: social practice and social product, Edited by: FILER, A., London: Falmer Press.
10. CLARKE, M., MADAUS, G. F., HORN, C. J., and RAMOS, M. A., 2000. Retrospective on educational testing and assessment in the 20th century. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2): 159–181.
11. CROOKS, T., 1988. The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58: 438–481.
12. DECI, E. L., and RYAN, R. M., 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior, New York: Plenum.
13. DECI, E. L., KOESTNER, R., and RYAN, R. M., 1999. A meta-analysis review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125: 627–688.
14. DWECK, C. S., 1992. The study of goals in psychology. Psychological Science, 3: 165–167.
15. GROLNICK, W. S., and RYAN, R. M., 1987. Autonomy in children's learning: an experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 890–898.
16. HIDI, S., 2000. “ An interest researcher's perspective: the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation ”. In Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: the search for optimal motivation and performance, Edited by: SANSOME, C., and HARACKIEWICZ, J. M., New York: Academic Press.
17. HIDI, S., and HARACKIEWICZ, J. M., 2000. Motivating the academically unmotivated: a critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2): 151–179.
18. JOHNSTON, C., 1996. Unlocking the Will to Learn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19. KELLAGHAN, T., MADAUS, G., and RACZEK, A., 1996. The Use of External Examinations to Improve Student Motivation, Washington DC: AERA.
20. KOHN, A., 1993. Punished by Rewards, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
21. KOHN, A., 2000. The Case Against Standardized Testing, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. KORETZ, D., 1988. Arriving at Lake Wobegon: are standardised tests exaggerating achievement and distorting instruction?. American Educator, 12(2): 8–15.
23. KORETZ, D., LINN, R. L, DUNBAR, S. B., and SHEPARD, L. A., The effects of high-stakes testing on achievement: preliminary findings about generalization across tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April3-7, Chicago, IL.
24. LINN, R., 2000. Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29: 4–16.
25. MADAUS, G., and CLARKE, M., The adverse impact of high stakes testing on minority students: evidence from 100 years of test data. High Stakes K-12 Testing Conference. December41998. Harvard University. Paper revised May 1999
26. MAINES, B., and ROBINSON, G., 1996. BIG Steem: a self esteem scale with locus of control items, Bristol: Lucky Duck Publishing.
27. McCOMES, B. L., 1999. Learner-Centred Classroom Practices, Denver, Colorado: University of Denver Research Institute. Available from the author.
28. McCOMES, B. L., and WHISLER, J., 1997. The Learner Centred Classroom and School, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29. McDONALD, A., 2001. The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21: 89–101.
30. McNEIL, L., and VALENZUELA, A., The harmful effects of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: beneath the accountability rhetoric. High Stakes K-12 Testing Conference. 4 December. Harvard University. 1998
31. NORWICKI, S., and STRICKLAND, B., 1973. A locus of control scale for children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40: 148–155.
32. OECD. 2001. Knowledge and Skills for Life. First results from PISA 2000, Paris: OECD.
33. OSBORN, M., McNESS, E., BROADFOOT, P., POLLARD, A., and TRIGGS, P., 2000. What Teachers Do: changing policy and practice in primary education, London: Continuum.
34. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS. 2000. “ Press release 06/01/00 ”. See www.pat.org.uk
35. RESNICK, L. B., and NOLAN, K. L., 1995. “ Standards for education ”. In Debating the Future of American Education: do we need national standards and assessment?, Edited by: RAVITCH, D., Washington DC: Blockings Institution.
36. SCHOEN, H. L., FEY, J. T., HIRSCH, C. R., and COXFORD, A. E., 1999. Issues and options in math wars. Phi Delta Kappan, February: 444–453.
37. SCHUNK, D., 1991. Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26: 207–231.
38. STIGGINS, R., 2001. Student-Involved Classroom Assessment, (3rd edn), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
39. WATKINS, D., 2000. Learning and teaching: a cross-cultural perspective. School Leadership and Management, 20(2): 161–173.