Making benchmark testing work

Educational Leadership

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 48-54

  Herman, Joan L ^a   Baker, Eva L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044451302     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2001). What mathematical knowledge is entailed in teaching children to reason mathematically? In National Research Council, Knowing and learning mathematics for teaching: Proceedings of a workshop (pp. 26-34). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Carpenter, T., & Franke, M. (2001). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 155-162). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.
3. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instruction psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 161-238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. diSessa, A., & Minstrell, J. (1998). Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons. In J. G. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in learning and teaching science and mathematics (pp. 155-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence in education (pp. 21-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Herman, J. (2005). Making accountability work to improve student learning. (CSE Technical Report #649). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
7. Hoff, D. (2000, Jan. 26). Testing ups and downs predictable. Education Week, pp. 1, 12-13.
8. Linn, R. (2000). Assessment and accountability. Educational Research, 29, 2.
9. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 436 999)
10. Porter, A. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31, 3-14.
11. VanLehn, K. (1996). Cognitive skill acquisition. In J. Spence, J. Darly, & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 513-539). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
12. Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.