Designing assessments of learning with technology

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 389-407

  Quellmalz, Edys S ^a   Kozma, Robert ^a  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542610267     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594032000148208     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adelman, N., Donnelly, M.B., Dove, T., Tiffany-Morales, J., Wayne, A., & Zucker, A., (2002) The Integrated Studies of Educational Technology: professional development and teachers’ use of technology (Washington, DC, SRI International).
2. Bachelard, G., (1984) The New Scientific Spirit (Boston, MA, Beacon).
3. Baxter, G. P., and Glaser, R., 1998. The cognitive complexity of science performance assessments. Educational Measurement: issues and practice, 17 (3): 37–45.
4. Becker, H. J., & Anderson, R. E., (1998) Teacher's Survey: versions 1–4 (Irvine, CA, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations). Available at http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/FINDINGS/internet-use/
5. Bracewell, R., Breuleux, A., Laferriere, T., Benoit, J., & Abdous, M., (1998) The Emerging Contribution of Online Resources and Tools to Classroom Learning and Teaching. Available at http://www.tact.fse.ulaval.ca/ang/html/rev98es/html
6. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R., (2000) How People Learn: brain, mind, experience, and school (Washington, DC, National Academic Press).
7. Burns, T. C., and Ungerleider, C. S., 2002. Information and communication technologies in elementary and secondary education. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research and Practice, 3 (4): 27–54.
8. Coley, R. J., Cradler, J., & Engle, P. K., (1999) Computers and Classrooms: the status of technology in JJ.W. schools (Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center). Retrieved from http:/www/etc.org/research/pic/compclass.html
9. Crawford, V., & Toyama, Y., (2002) Assessment of student technology proficiency and an analysis of the need for technology proficiency assessments: a review of state approaches. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, April.
10. European Commission (2000) eEuopre: an information society for all (Brussels, European Commission).
11. Holland, J. H., (1995) Hidden Order: how adaptation builds complexity (New York, Addison-Wesley).
12. International Society for technology in Education ISTE (2000) National Educational Technology Standards for Students: connecting curriculum and technology (Eugene, OR, ISTE).
13. Kozma, R., (2003) Technology, Innovation, and Educational Change: a global perspective (Eugene, OR, International Society for Educational Technology).
14. Kozma, R. B., 1991. Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2): 179–211.
15. McFarlane, A. E., Harrison, C, Somekh, B., Scrimshaw, P., Harrison, A., (2000) The Impact of ICT on Attainment. Preliminary Study 1 for the Impact 2 Project. Electronically published report to UK Government: http://www.becta.org.uk/research
16. Means, B., & Olson, K., (1995) Technology's Role in Education Reform: findings from a national study of innovating schools (Washington, DC, US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement).
17. Means, B., Penuel, B., & Quellmalz, E., (2000) Developing assessments for tomorrow's classrooms, in: W., Heineke & L., Blasi Research Methods for Educational Technology (Greenwich, CT, Information Age Publishing).
18. National Center for Educational Statistics (2001) Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994–2000 (Washington, DC, NCES).
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (Reston, VA, NCTM).
20. National Science Education Standards (NSES) (1996) (Washington, DC, National Academy Press).
21. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001a) Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: the PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical, and scientific literacy (Paris, OECD).
22. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001b) Education Policy Analysis (Paris, OECD).
23. Pea, R. D., (1993) Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education, in: G. S. Solomon (Ed.) Distributed Cognitions: psychological and educational considerations (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
24. Pelgrum, W., & Anderson, R., (1999) ICT and the Emerging Paradigm for Life Long Learning: a worldwide educational assessment of infrastructure, goals, and practices (Amsterdam, IEA).
25. Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R., (2001) Knowing What Students Know: the science and design of educational assessment (Washington, DC, National Academy Press).
26. Perkins, D. N., (1993) Person-plus: a distributed view of thinking and learning, in: G. S., Solomon Distributed Cognitions: psychological and educational considerations (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
27. Quellmalz, E. S., (1987) Developing reasoning skills, in: J.R., Baron & R.J., Sternberg Teaching Thinking Skills: theory and practice (New York, Freedman Press).
28. Quellmalz, E. S., & Haertel, G., (2002) Validities of Standards-based Science Inquiry Assessments: design study report (Menlo Park, CA, SRI International).
29. Quellmalz, E. S., & Hinojosa, T., (2000) Technology supported assessment of technology proficiency—assessment frameworks. Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, April.
30. Quellmalz, E. S., & Zalles, D., (1998) World Links Student Assessment, 1998–1999 Report (Menlo Park, CA, SRI International).
31. Quellmalz, E. S., & Zalles, D., (2002a) Designing Technology Assessments Cognitive-based Modular Design. Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, April.
32. Quellmalz, E. S., & Zalles, D., (2002b) World Links for Development: student assessment Uganda field test, 2000. Report to the World Links for Development Organization (Menlo Park, CA: SRI International).
33. Solomon, G. S., (1993) No distribution without individuals’ cognition: a dynamic interactional view, in: G. S., Solomon Distributed Cognitions: psychological and educational considerations (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
34. Solomon, G. S., Perkins, D. N., and Globerson, T., 1991. Partners in cognition: extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20 (3): 2–9.
35. Wenglinski, H., (1998) Does It Compute? The Relationship between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics (Princeton, NJ, ETS).
36. Zalles, D., & Yarnall, L., (2000) Using online tools to assess students’ research and communication skills. Paper delivered at the Center for Innovative Learning Technologies Conference. Chevy Chase, MD, October.