Assessing the Inaccessible: Metacognition and attitudes

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 375-388

  Nunes, Cesar A A ^a   Nunes, Marina M R ^b   Davis, Claudia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FUNDAÇÃO CARLOS CHAGAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250346270     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594032000148109     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Advanced Distributed Learning (2001) Sharable Content Object Reference Model: the SCORM overview, version 1.2, P., Dods (Ed.) Available at http://www.adlnet.org/ADLDOCS/Documents/SCORM_1.2_Overview.pdf
2. Baker, E. L., and O'Neil, H. F., Jr. 2002. Measuring problem solving in computer environments: current and future states. Computers in Human Behaviour, 18 (6): 609–622.
3. Bennett, R. E., (2002) Inexorable and inevitable: the continuing story of technology and assessment, Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1 (1), Available at http://www.jtla.org
4. Bennett, R. E., & Persky, H., (2001) NAEP Technology-Based Assessment Project. Paper presented at The Future and Challenges of Educational Assessment in the 21 st Century, 27th Annual IAEA Conference, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, May.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R., (2000) How People Learn: brain, mind, experience and school (expanded edn) The National Academy of Sciences. Available at http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309070368/html/18.html
6. Bruer, J. T., 1999. Schools for Thought: a science of learning in the classroom, 5th edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Davidson, J. E., Deuser, R., and Sternberg, R. J., 1996. “ The role of metacognition in problem solving ”. In Knowing About Knowing, Edited by: Metcalfe, J., and Shimamura, A. P., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Davis, C., Nunes, C., & Nunes, M., (2001) New Technologies, New Ways of Learning? Paper presented at The Future and Challenges of Educational Assessment in the 21st Century. 27th Annual IAEA Conference, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, May.
9. Flavell, J. H., 1976. “ Metacognitive aspects of problem solving ”. In The Nature of Intelligence, Edited by: Resnick, L., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Halford, G. S., Andrews, G., Dalton, C, Boag, C., and Zielinsky, T., 2002. Young children's performance on the balance scale: the influence of relational complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81 (4): 417–445.
11. IMS Global Learning Consortium (2002a) E-learning Specifications: why do you need them? Retrieved [29/7/02] from http://www.imsproject.org/pressrelease/ims_whydoyouneedem.pdf
12. IMS Global Learning Consortium (2002b) IMS Question & Test Interoperability: an overview, Retrieved [11/2/02] from http://www.imsproject.org/question/qtivlp2/imsqti_oviewvlp2.html
13. Koper, R., (2002) Educational Modelling Language: adding instructional design to existing specifications. Available at http://www.rz.uni-frankfurt.de/neue_medien/standardisierung/koper_text.pdf
14. Lester, F. K., (1998) Trends and issues in mathematical problem solving research, in: Lesh, R., & Landau, M., Acquisition of Mathematical Concepts and Processes (New York, Academic Press). Quoted in: J. I., Pozo (Ed.) A Solução de Problemas: aprender a resoher, resolver para aprender [ Problem Solution: learn to solve, solve to learn] (Porto Alegre, RGS, ARTMED).
15. Mcginnis, J. R., & Parker, C., (1999) Teacher Candidates’ Attitudes and Beliefs of Subject Matter and Pedagogy Measured Throughout Their Reform-Based Mathematics and Science. Teacher Preparation Program. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada, April 19–23.
16. Means, B., Penuel, B., & Quellmalz, E., (2000) Developing assessments for tomorrow's class-rooms, in: The Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology—Measuring Impacts and Shaping the Future. Available at http://www.ed.gov/Technology/techconf/2000/means_paper. html
17. Michaelwicz, Z., and Fogel, D. B., 2000. How to Solve It: modern heuristics, Berlin: Heidelberg Press.
18. Nunes, C. A. A., (2002) Collaborative content creation by cross-level students. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Open Collaborative Design for Sustainable Innovation: Creativity, Control & Culture for Sustainable Change, Bangalore, India, December 1–2. Available at http://thinkcycle.media.mit.edu/thinkcycle/main/develop-ment_ by_design_2002/publication collaborative_content_creation_by_cross_level_students
19. Nunes, C. A. A., & Gaible, E., (2002) Development of multimedia materials, in: A.Draxler & W.Haddad Technologies for Education: potential, pre-requisites, constraints and prospects (UNESCO and Academy for Educational Development). Available at http://www.aed.org/ publications/TechEdlnfo.html
20. O'Neil, H. F., Jr. 1999. Perspectives on computer-based performance assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15 (3/4): 225–268.
21. O'Neil, H. F., Jr. 2002. Perspectives on computer-based assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behaviour, 18 (6): 605–607.
22. Perkins, D., 2000. Archimedes’ Bathtub: the art and logic of breakthrough thinking, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
23. Pólya, G., 1945. How to Solve It: a new aspect of mathematical method, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Pozo, J. I., (1998) A Solução de Problemas: aprender a resolver, resolver para aprender [ Problem Solution: learn to solve, solve to learn] (Porto Alegre, RGS, ARTMED).
25. Ridgway, J., and McCusker, S., 2003. Using computers to assess new educational goals. Assessment in Education, 10 (3): 309–328.
26. Siegler, R. S., 1988. Children's Thinking, 3rd edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Siegler, R. S., and Chen, Z., 2002. Development of rules and strategies: balancing the old and the new. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81 (4): 446–457.
28. Vygotsky, L. S., 1991. A Formação Social da Mente [Mind in Society], 4th edn, São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
29. Wiley, D. A., (2000) Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and taxonomy, in: D. A., Wiley The Instructional Use of Learning Objects (Association for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communications and Technology). Available at http://www.reusability.org/read