Social science insights for the BioCCS industry

Energies

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 4024-4042

  Dowd, Anne Maree ^a   Rodriguez, Michelle ^a   Jeanneret, Talia ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

BioCCS; Bioenergy; Biomass; Public acceptance; Social choice; Social license to operate

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

BIO-ENERGY; BIOCCS; LICENSE TO OPERATE; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; SOCIAL CHOICE;

BIOMASS;

EID: 84930808371     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19961073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/en8054024     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Corner, A.; Pidgeon, N.; Parkhill, K. Perceptions of geoengineering: Public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of 'upstream' engagement. Climate Change 2012, 3, 451-466.
2. Galaz, V. Geo-engineering, governance, and social-ecological systems: Critical issues and joint research needs. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17, 24.
3. Royal Society. Geoengineering the Climate SCIENCE, Governance and Uncertainty; Royal Society: London, UK, 2009.
4. Stephens, J.C. Carbon capture and storage: A controvesial climate mitigation approach. Int. Spectator 2015, 50, 74-84.
5. Einsiedel, E.F.; Boyd, A.D.; Medlock, J.; Ashworth, P. Assessing sociotechnical mindsets: Public deliberations on carbon capture and storage in the context of energy sources and climate change. Energ. Policy 2013, 53, 149-158.
6. Ashworth, P.; Dowd, A.-M.; Rodriguez, M.; Jeanneret, T.; Mabon, L.; Howell, R. Synthesis of CCS Social Research: Reflections and Current State of Play in 2013; EP134303; CSIRO: Brisbane, Australia, 2013; pp. 1-51.
7. Markusson, N.; Ishii, A.; Stephens, J.C. The social and political complexities of learning in carbon capture and storage demonstration projects. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21, 293-302.
8. Stephens, J.C. Growing interest in carbon capture and storage (CCS) for climate change mitigation. SSPP 2006, 2, 4-13.
9. Global CCS Institute. The Global Status of CCS: 2014; Global CCS Institute: Canberra, Australia, 2014.
10. Herzog, H.; Eide, J. Rethinking CCS-Moving forward in times of uncertainty. Mining Report 2013, 1, 44-50.
11. IEA/Global CCS Institute. Tracking Progress in Carbon Capture and Storage: International Energy Agency/Global CCS Institute Report to the Third CLEAN Energy Ministerial 2012; OECD/IEA and the Global CCS Institute: Canberra, Australia, 2012; pp. 1-19.
12. Karlstrom, M.; Sanden, B.A. Selecting and assessing demonstration projects for technology assessment: The cases of fuel cells and hydrogen systems in Sweden. Innovation 2004, 6, 286-293.
13. Gough, C.; Upham, P. Biomass Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): A Review; The Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Manchester: Manchester, UK, 2010; Working Paper 147, p. 29.
14. Gough, C.; Upham, P. Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS or Bio-CCS). Greenh. Gas. 2011, 1, 324-334.
15. Karlsson, H.; Byström, L. Global Status of BECCS Projects 2010; Biorecro AB: Stockholm, Sweden, 2011; pp. 1-45.
16. Vergragt, P.J.; Markusson, N.; Karlsson, H. Carbon capture and storage, bio-energy with carbon capture and storage, and the escape from the fossil-fuel lock-in. Glob. Environ. Change 2011, 21, 282-292.
17. Pinder, C. Moving Below Zero: Understanding Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage; The Climate Institute: Melbourne, Australia, 2014.
18. L'Orange Seigo, S.; Dohle, S.; Siegrist, M. Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2014, 38, 848-863.
19. International Energy Agency. CCS 2014: What Lies in Store for CCS?. Insight Series 2014; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2014.
20. Hobman, E.V.; Ashworth, P.; Graham, P.; Hayward, J. The Australian Public's Preferences for Energy Sources and Related Technologies; EP123990; CSIRO: Brisbane, Australia, 2012; pp. 1-44.
21. L'Orange Seigo, S.; Arvai, J.; Dohle, S.; Siegrist, M. Predictors of risk and benefit perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in regions with different stages of deploysment. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 2014, 25, 23-32.
22. International Energy Agency. Energy Technology Perspectives 2010: Scenarios & Strategies to 2050; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2010; p. 706.
23. Cherubini, F.; Bird, N.D.; Cowie, A.; Jungmeier, G.; Schlamadinger, B.; Woess-Gallasch, S. Energy-and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2009, 53, 434-447.
24. Asveld, L.; Roeser, S. The Ethics of Technological Risk; Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, 2009.
25. Tjernshaugen, A.; Langhell, O. Caching the Carbon: The Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage; Edward Elgar Publishing Limited: Cheltenham, UK, 2009.
26. Stirling, A. Towards Innovation Democracy? Participation, Responsibility and Precaution in Innovation Governance, STEPS Working Paper 78; STEPS Centre: Brighton, UK, 2015; pp. 1-41.
27. Dosi, G. Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics-Selected Essays; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2000.
28. O'Riordan, T.; Cameron, J.; Jordan, A. Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle; Cameron May: London, UK, 2001.
29. Rafffensperger, C., Tickner, J.A., Eds. Protecting Public Health & Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
30. Reiner, D.M.; Curry, T.E.; De Figueiredo, M.A.; Herzog, H.J.; Ansolabehere, S.D.; Itaoka, K.; Johnsson, F.; Odenberger, M. American exceptionalism? Similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warming. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 2093-2098.
31. IPAC CO2 Research Inc. Public Awareness and Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage in Canada; Insightrix Research, Inc.: Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2011.
32. European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 364: Public Awareness and Acceptance of CO2 Capture and Storage; TNS Opinion & Social: Brussells, Belgium, 2011.
33. de Best-Waldhober, M.; Daamen, D.; Faaij, A. Informed and uninformed public opinions on CO2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 2009, 3, 322-332.
34. Fleishman, L.; De Bruin, W.; Morgan, M. Informed public preferences for elec-tricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies. Risk Anal. 2010, 30, 1399-1410.
35. Achillas, C.; Vlachokostas, C.; Moussiopoulos, N.; Banias, G.; Kafetzopoulos, G.; Karagiannidis, A. Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2011, 55, 857-863.
36. Upham, P.; Roberts, T. Public Perceptions of CCS: The Results of NearCO2 European Focus Groups; University of Manchester: Manchester, UK, 2010; pp. 1-32.
37. Gough, C.; Mander, S. Are we nearly there yet? A review of progress against CCS roadmaps in the UK. Energ. Environ. 2011, 23, 367-374.
38. Roberts, T.; Mander, S. Assessing public perceptions of CCS: Benefits, challenges and methods. Energy Procedia 2011, 4, 6307-6314.
39. Roman, M. Carbon capture and storage in developing countries: A comparison of Brazil, South Africa and India. Glob. Environ. Change 2011, 21, 391-401.
40. Ashworth, P.; Pisarski, A.; Thambimuthu, K. Public acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage in a proposed demonstration area. P. I. Mech. Eng. A-J. Pow. 2009, 223, 299-304.
41. Shackley, S.; McLachlan, C.; Gough, C. The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: Results from focus groups and a survey. Clim. Policy 2004, 4, 377-398.
42. Feenstra, C.F.J.; Mikunda, T.; Brunsting, S. What Happened in Barendrecht? Case Study on the Planned Onshore Carbon Dioxide Storaage in Barendrecht, the Netherlands; Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN): Petten, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 1-44.
43. Bradbury, J.; Wade, S. Case Study of the Carson CCS Project; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; AJW, Inc.: Richland, WA, USA, 2010.
44. Ashworth, P.; Rodriguez, S.; Miller, A. Case Study of ZeroGen Project; EP103387; CSIRO: Brisbane, Australia, 2010.
45. Kaiser, M.; Zimmer, R.; Brunsting, S.; Mastop, J.; Pol, M. Development of CCS Projects in Poland. How to Communicate with the Local Public?. Energy Procedia 2014, 51, 267-273.
46. Hund, G.; Greenberg, S. FutureGen Case Study, In fulfilment of Task 1 for CSIRO on behalf of the Global CCS Institute: International Comparison of Public Outreach Practices Associated with Large Scale CCS Projects; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the Illinois State Geological Survey-Advanced Energy Technology Institute: Richland, WA, USA, 2010.
47. Brunsting, S.; Upham, P.; Dütschke, E.; de Best Waldhober, M.; Oltra, C.; Desbarats, J.; Riesch, H.; Reiner, D. Communicating CCS: Applying communications theory to public perceptions of carbon capture and storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 2011, 5, 1651-1662.
48. Dowd, A.-M.; Itaoka, K.; Ashworth, P.; Saito, A.; de Best-Waldhober, M. Investigating the link between knowledge and perception of CO2 and CCS: An international study. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 2014, 28, 79-87.
49. Global CCS Institute. The Global Status of CCS: 2011; Global CCS Institute: Canberra, Australia, 2011.
50. International Energy Agency. Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage; OECD/IEA: Paris, France, 2009.
51. van Alphen, K.; van Voorst tot Voorst, Q.; Hekkert, M.P.; Smits, R.E.J.M. Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies. Energ. Policy 2007, 35, 4368-4380.
52. Viebahn, P.; Vallentin, D.; Holler, S. Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India's power sector-An integrated assessment. Appl. Energy 2013, 117, 62-75.
53. Karayannis, V.; Charalampides, G.; Lakioti, E. Socio-economic aspects of CCS technologies. Procedia Economics Finance 2014, 14, 295-302.
54. Gupta, S. Are There Less Costly Ways to Sequester Carbon Than CCS? SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (ATCE 2009): New Orleans, LA, USA, 2009; pp. 411-421.
55. Kheshgi, H.S.; Prince, R.C.; Marland, G.; Kheshgi, H.S.; Prince, R.C.; Marland, G. The potential of biomass fuels in the context of global climate change: Focus on transportation fuels. Ann. Rev. Energ. Environ. 2000, 25, 199-244.
56. Stucley, C.; Schuck, S.; Sims, R.; Bland, J.; Marino, B.; Borowitzka, M.; Abadi, A.; Bartle, J.; Giles, R.; Thomas, Q. BioEnergy in Australia: Status and Opportunities; BioEnergies: St Leonards, Australia, 2012.
57. Farine, D.R.; O'Connell, D.A.; Raison, R.J.; May, B.M.; O'Connor, M.H.; Crawford, D.F.; Herr, A.; Taylor, J.A.; Jovanovic, T.; Cambell, P.K.; et al. An assessment of biomass for bioelectricity and biofuel, and for greenhouse gas emission reduction in Australia. GCB Bioenerg. 2012, 4, 148-175.
58. Moghtaderi, B.; Changdong, S.; Wall, T.F. An overview of the Australian Biomass resources and utilization technologies. Australian BioResources 2006, 1, 93-115.
59. Biomass with CO2 Capture and Storage (Bio-CCS): The way forward for Europe; Zero Emissions Platform: Brussells, Belgium, 2012; pp. 1-30.
60. Arasto, A.; Onarheim, K.; Tsupari, E.; Kärki, J. Bio-CCS: Feasibility comparison of large scale carbon-negative solutions. Energy Procedia 2014, 63, 6756-6769.
61. Bruckner, T.; Bashmakov, I.A.; Mulugetta, Y.; Chum, H.; de la Vega Navarro, A.; Edmonds, J.; Faaij, A.; Fungtammasan, B.; Garg, A.; Hertwich, E.; et al. Energy Systems. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2014.
62. Creutzig, F.; Ravindranath, N.H.; Berndes, G.; Bolwig, S.; Bright, R.; Cherubini, F.; Chum, H.; Corbera, E.; Delucchi, M.; Faaij, A.; et al. Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: An assessment. GCB Bioenergy 2014, doi:10.1111/gcbb.12205.
63. Winjum, J.K.; Dixon, R.K.; Schroeder, P.E. Estimating the global potential of forest and agroforest management practices to sequester carbon. Water Air Soil Poll. 1992, 64, 213-227.
64. Mutuo, P.; Cadisch, G.; Albrecht, A.; Palm, C.; Verchot, L. Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 2005, 71, 43-54.
65. Lenton, T.; Huntingford, C. Global terrestrial carbon storage and uncertainties in its temperature sensitivity examined with a simple model. Glob. Change Biol. 2003, 9, 1333-1352.
66. Rhodes, J.S.; Keith, D.W. Biomass with capture: Negative emissions within social and environmental constraints: an editorial comment. Climate Change 2008, 87, 321-328.
67. Farrell, A.E.; Plevin, R.J.; Turner, B.T.; Jones, A.D.; O'Hare, M.; Kammen, D.M. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 2006, 311, 506-508.
68. Pimentel, D.; Patzek, T.W. Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood; biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Nat. Resour. Res. 2005, 14, 65-76.
69. Acosta, L.A.; Eugenio, E.A.; Enano, N.H., Jr.; Magcale-Macandog, D.B.; Vega, B.A.; Macandog, P.B.M.; Eugenio, J.M.A.; Lopez, M.A.; Salvacion, A.R.; Lucht, W. Sustainability trade-offs in bioenergy development in the Phillippines: An application of conjoint analysis. Biomass Bioenerg. 2014, 64, 20-41.
70. van der Horst, D.; Vermeylen, S. Spatial scale and social impacts of biofuel production. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011, 35, 2435-2443.
71. The Global Status of CCS: 2010; Global CCS Institute: Canberra, Australia, 2010.
72. GEA. Global Energy Assessment-Toward a Sustainable Future; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis: Laxenburg, Austria, 2012.
73. Bellamy, R.; Healey, P. A Report on the Climate Geoengineering Governance Project Scenarios Workshop; Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, University of Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2015; pp. 1-15.
74. IPCC. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. In Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H.C., Loos, M., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 442.
75. International Energy Agency. Combining Bioenergy with CCS: Reporting and Accounting for Negative Emissions under UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2011; pp. 1-25.
76. White Rose Carbon Capture and Storage Project. Available online: http://www.whiteroseccs.co.uk/(accessed on 10 February 2015).
77. Ethanol plant gets key EPA permit for carbon sequestration. Available online: http://www.governorsbiofuelscoalition.org/?p=9081 (accessed on 10 February 2015).
78. Decatur Fact Sheet: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Stroage Project. Available online: http://sequestration.mit.edu/contact/index.html (accessed on 10 February 2015).
79. Danilov, V.I.; Sotsko, A.I. Social Choice Mechanisms. Studies in Economic Design; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2002.
80. Sen, A. Environmental evaluation and social choice: contingent valuation and the market analogy. Jpn. Econom. Rev. 1995, 46, 23-37.
81. Singleton, G.R. Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide: Risk Analyses and Implications for Public Acceptance. In Engineering Systems Division and the Department of Political Science; Masters of Science in Technology and Policy; Masters of Science in Political Science: Charlottesville, VA, USA, 2007; p. 123.
82. Bennaceur, K. CO2 Capture and Sequestration. Future Energy 2014, 583-611.
83. Wallquist, L.; Seigo, S.L.O.; Visschers, V.H.M.; Siegrist, M. Public acceptance of CCS system elements: A conjoint measurement. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 2012, 6, 77-83.
84. Koornneef, J.; van Breevoort, P.; Hamelinck, C.; Hendrik, C.; Hoogwijk, M.; Koop, K.; Koper, M.; Dixon, T.; Camps, A. Global potential for biomass and carbon dioxide capture, transport and storage up to 2050. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 2012, 11, 117-132.
85. Gunningham, N.; Kagan, R.; Thornton, D. Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law Soc. Inq. 2004, 29, 307-341.
86. Owen, J.R.; Kemp, D. Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resources Policy 2013, 38, 29-35.
87. Thomson, I.; Joyce, S. Earning a social licence to operate: Social acceptability and resource development in Latin America. CIM Bull. 2000, 93, 49.
88. Greenwood, M. Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 2007, 74, 315-327.
89. Lawrence, A.T. The Drivers of Stakeholder Engagement. J. Corp. Citizenship 2002, 6, 71-85.
90. Lacey, J.; Parsons, R.; Moffat, K. Exploring the Concept of a Social Licence to Operate in the Australian Minerals Industry: Results from Interviews with Industry Representatives; CSIRO: Brisbane, Australia, 2012.
91. Parsons, R.; Lacey, J.; Moffat, K. Maintaining legitimacy of a contested practice: how the minerals industry understands it 'social licence to operate'. Resource Policy 2014, 41, 83-90.
92. Nelsen, J.L. Social license to operate. Int. J. Mining Reclamat. Environ. 2006, 20, 161-162.
93. Brown, J.; Fraser, M. Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: an overview of the conceptual landscape. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2006, 15, 103-117.
94. Hall, N.; Lacey, J.; Carr-Cornish, S.; Dowd, A.-M. Social licence to operate: understanding how a concept has been translated into practice in energy industries. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 86, 301-310.
95. Dowd, A.-M.; James, M. A Social Licence for Carbon Dixocide Capture and Storage: How Engineers and Managers Describe Community Relations. Soc. Epistemol. 2014, 28, 364-384.
96. Prno, J.; Slocombe, D.S. Exploring the origins of 'social license to operate' in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resour. Policy 2012, 37, 346-357.
97. Falck, W.E.; Spangenberg, J.H. Selection of social demand-based indicators: EO-based indicators for mining. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 84, 193-203.
98. Moffat, K.; Zhang, A. The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resour. Policy 2014, 39, 61-70.
99. What is Social Infrastructure. Available online: http://www.nzsif.co.nz/Social-Infrastructure/What-is-Social-Infrastructure/(accessed on 13 February 2015).
100. Greer, L.; Tabert, S.; Lockie, S. Food, Coal or Gas? Community Action, Land-Use Conflict and Procedural Fairness in the Surat Basin, Queensland. In Agri-Food XVIII: Sustainabilities, Justice and Agriculture in the Asia-Pacific Region Conference; Australian National University: Canberra, Australia, 2011; pp. 1-14.
101. Eswarlal, V.K.; Vasudevan, G.; Dey, P.K.; Vasudevan, P. Role of community acceptance in sustainable bioenergy projects in India. Energy Policy 2014, 73, 333-343.
102. Lewicki, R.J.; McAllister, D.J.; Bies, R.J. Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998, 23, 438-458.
103. Tropp, L.R. The Role of Trust in Intergroup Contact: Its Significance and Implications for Improving Relations between Groups. In Improving Intergroup Relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Social Issues and Interventions; Wagner, U., Tropp, L.R., Finchilescu, G., Tredoux, C., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing: Malden, MA, USA, 2008.
104. Huijts, N.M.A.; Molin, E.J.E.; Stegb, L. Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2012, 525-531.
105. James, M.; Dowd, A.-M.; Rodriguez, S.; Jeanneret, T. How Australians Value Water: Results of a Literature Review; EP118291; CSIRO: Brisbane, Australia, 2012.
106. Itaoka, K.; Saito, A.; Paukovic, M.; de Best-Waldhober, M.; Dowd, A.-M.; Jeanneret, T.; Ashworth, P.; James, M. Understanding How Individuals Perceive Carbon Dioxide. Implications for Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; EP118160; CSIRO: Brisbane, Australia, 2012.
107. Wade, S.; Greenberg, S. Social Site Characterisation: from Concept to Application. A Review of Relevant Social Science Literature and a Toolkit for Social Site Characterisation; CSIRO: Brisbane, Australia, 2011.
108. Desbarats, J.; Upham, P.; Reisch, H.; Reiner, D.; Brunsting, S.; de Best Waldhober, M.; Duetschke, E.; Oltra, C.; Sala, R.; McLachlan, C. Review of the Public Participation Practices for CCS and Non-CCS Projects in Europe; Institute for European Environmental Policy: London, UK, 2010.
109. Howell, R.; Shackley, S.; Mabon, L. Public Perceptions to Low Carbon Energy Technologies-Results from a Scottish Large Group Workshop; University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2012.
110. Ashworth, P.; Quezada, G. Who's talking CCS?. Energy Procedia 2011, 4, 6194-6201.
111. Goodell, R. The Visible Scientists; Little, Brown and Company: Boston, MA, USA, 1975; p. 242.
112. Mazur, J.E. Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a two-response situation. Science 1981, 214, 823-825.
113. Miller, M.M.; Riechert, B.P. Chapter 2: Interest group strategies and journalistic norms: News media framing of enviromental issues. In Environmental Risks and the Media; Allan, S., Adam, B., Carter, C., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 45-54.
114. Zoellner, J.; Schweizer-Ries, P.; Wemheuer, C. Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4136-4141.
115. Bradbury, J.; Dooley, J.J. Who's talking? What are the issues? The media's portrayal of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in the United States. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on in Greenhouse Gas Technology (GHGT-7), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5-9 September 2004.
116. Dowd, A.-M.; Ashworth, P.; Rodriguez, M.; Jeanneret, T. CCS in the media: An analysis of international coverage. Energ. Environ. 2012, 23, 283-298.
117. Gough, C.; Mander, S. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in the Media; Prepared for the IEA Greenhouse Gas R & D Programme; Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Manchester: Manchester, UK, 2006.
118. Amigun, B.; Musango, J.K.; Brent, A.C. Community perspectives on the introduction of biodiesel production in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Energy 2011, 36, 2502-2508.
119. Arevalo, J.; Ochieng, R.; Mola-Yudego, B.; Gritten, D. Understanding bioenergy conflicts: Case of a jatropha project in Kenya's Tana Delta. Land Use Policy 2014, 41, 138-148.