Who's talking CCS?

Energy Procedia

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 6194-6201

  Ashworth, Peta ^a   Quezada, George ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Carbon capture and storage; Clean coal; Emerging technologies; Media; Perceptions

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL STORAGE; DIGITAL STORAGE; GREENHOUSE GASES; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ATTITUDES; CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CCS TECHNOLOGIES; CLEAN COAL; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; MEDIA; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; PUBLIC PERCEPTION;

CARBON CAPTURE;

EID: 79955424325     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.631     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Ashworth, P, Boughen, N, Mayhew, M, Millar, F. From research to action: Now we have to move on CCS communication. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010; 4:426-433.
2. Nisbet, MC, Brossard, D, Kroepsch, A. Framing science - the stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics 2003; 8(2):36-70. (Pubitemid 36719570) (Pubitemid 36719570)
3. Scheufele, DA, Lewenstein, BV. The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2005; 7:659-667. (Pubitemid 41767366) (Pubitemid 41767366)
4. Scheufele, DA. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication. 1999; 49(1):103-122.
5. Scheufele, DA. Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society 2000; 3(2 & 3):297-316.
6. Scheufele, DA. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication. 1999; 49(1):103-122.
7. Scheufele, DA, Lewenstein, BV. The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2005; 7:659-667. (Pubitemid 41767366) (Pubitemid 41767366)
8. Chong, D, Druckman, JN. Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 2007; 10(1):103-126.
9. nd Ed.) 1991. New York:McGraw-Hill.
10. Brossard, D, Nisbet, MC. Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding the US opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2006; 19(1):24-52.
11. Popkin, SL. The reasoning voter:communcation and persuasion in presidential campaigns. 1991; Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
12. Ho, S., Brossard, D, Scheufele, D. Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2008; 20(2):171-192.
13. Mander, S, Gough, C. Media framing of new technology:the case of carbon capture and storage. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT8) 2006. Trondheim, Norway.
14. Slovic, P. The percetion of Risk 2000. London:Earthscan.