Assessing public perceptions of CCS: Benefits, challenges and methods

Energy Procedia

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 6307-6314

  Roberts, Thomas ^a   Mander, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Carban capture; Governace; Methodology; Public perceptions

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CARBON; DECISION MAKING; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GASES;

CAPTURE AND STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES; CARBAN CAPTURE; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; GOVERNACE; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

CARBON CAPTURE;

EID: 79955455622     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.646     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Alford, R. and Friendland, R. (1975). Political Participation and Public Policy. Annual Review of Sociology. 1. 472.
2. Beck, U. and Kropp, C. (2007). Environmental and Risks and Public Perceptions. In. Pretty, J., Ball, A. S., Benton, T., Guivant, J.S., Lee, D. R., Orr, D., Pfeffer, M. and Ward, H. The SAGE Handbook of Environment and Society. SAGE. London.
3. Binmore, K. (1998). Just Playing: Game Theory and the Social Contract II. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
4. Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzono, N. F., Pidgeon, W., Poortinga, W. and Simmons, P. (2008). Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science. 17. 145-169.
5. Burgess, J and Chilvers, J. (2007). Upping the ante: a conceptual framework for exploring participatory technology assessments. Science and Public Policy. 34. 10. 713-728. (Pubitemid 46401657) (Pubitemid 46401657)
6. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
7. Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
9. Energy White Paper. (2003). Our Energy Future: Creating a Low Carbon Economy. HMSO. Cm 5761.
10. th Report of session 2007-2008.
11. Fiorino, D. (1990). Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Science Technology and Human Values. 15. 2. 226-243.
12. Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and Responsibility. Modern Law Review. 62.1. 1-10.
13. Hampton, G. (2009). Narrative policy analysis and the integration of public involvement in decision making. Policy Science. 42. 3. 227-242.
14. Horning, G. (1999). Citizen Panels as a form of deliberative technology assessment. Science and Public Policy. 26. 5. 351-359. (Pubitemid 30081403) (Pubitemid 30081403)
15. Howarth, R. B. and M. A. Wilson. (2007). A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: aggregation by mutual consent. Land Economics. 82:1-16.
16. Huitema, D., van de Kerkhof, M. and Pesch, U. (2007). The nature of the beast. Are citizens' juries deliberative or pluralist? Policy Sciences. 40. 4. 287-311. (Pubitemid 50003382) (Pubitemid 50003382)
17. Kasemir, B., Jaeger, C.C and Jager, J. (2003). Citizen participation in sustainability assessments. (in). Kasemir, B., Jaeger, C.C Jager, J and Gardner, M. T. Public Participation in Sustainability Science: A Handbook. Camberage University press. Cambridge. 1-62.
18. Mishra, A. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of Trust. In. Kramer, R. M and Tyler. T. R (eds.). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage. London.
19. OECD, I. (2001). Nuclear Power in the OECD. International Energy Agency (IEA)/Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris, France.
20. Pickett, S.E. (2002). Japan's nuclear energy policy: from firm commitment to difficult dilemma addressing growing stocks of plutonium, program delays, domestic opposition and international pressure. Energy Policy. 30. 15. 1337-1355. (Pubitemid 35371919) (Pubitemid 35371919)
21. Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., Lorenzoni, I. (2006). Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power, Climate Change and Energy Options in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted during October and November 2005. Understanding Risk Working Paper 06 02. School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
22. Renn, O and Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and Trust in Risk Communication. In. Kasperson, E and Stallen, P. J. M. Communicating risks to the public: international perspectives. Kluwer. Netherlands.
23. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., and Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A Cross-disciplinary view of trust. Academy of Management Review. 23. 3. 393-404. (Pubitemid 128114429) (Pubitemid 128114429)
24. Shackley, S., Mander, S., Reiche, A. (2006). Public perceptions of underground coal gasification in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy. 34. 18. 3423-3433. (Pubitemid 44567213) (Pubitemid 44567213)
25. Stern, P. C. and Fineberg, H. (1996). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC. National Academy Press.
26. van Alphen, K., van Voorst tot Voorst, Q., Hekkert, M.P. and Smits, R.E.H.M. (2007). Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies. Energy Policy. 35. 4368-4380. (Pubitemid 46760516) (Pubitemid 46760516)