Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 4368-4380

  van Alphen, Klaas ^a   van Voorst tot Voorst, Quirine ^a   Hekkert, Marko P ^a   Smits, Ruud E H M ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Media content analysis; Public opinion; Stakeholders' attitudes

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY STORAGE; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; MEDIA CONTENT ANALYSIS; PUBLIC OPINION; STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS;

CARBON;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; MASS MEDIA; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; STAKEHOLDER;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34248580111     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. AER, 1994. Advies AER over de Vervolgnota Energiebesparing. Den Haag, Algemene Energieraad.
2. Agterbosch, S., Glasbergen, P., Vermeulen, W.J.V., 2006. Social barriers in wind power implementation in The Netherlands: perceptions of wind power entrepreneurs and local civil servants of institutional and social conditions in realizing wind power projects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, in press, Corrected Proof.
3. Ashworth, P., Littleboy, A., Pisarski, A., Beath, A., Thambimuthu, K., 2006. Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives to low emission technologies in Australia. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), Trondheim, Norway.
4. Bongers F.J. Participatory Policy Analysis and Group Support Systems (2000), Tilburg, Katholieke Universiteit Braband
5. Boonekamp, P.G.M., van Hilten, O., Kroon, R., Rouw, M.N.E.V., 1992. Nationale Energie Verkenningen 1990-2015. ECH Report no. ECN-C-92-017, Petten, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation (ECN).
6. Bradbury, J., Dooley, J., 2004. Who's talking? What are the issues? The media portrayal of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in the United States. Seventh International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7), Vancouver, Canada.
7. CE, 1996. Nationale themadag waterstof. Delft (Netherlands), Centre for Energy Conservation and Environmental Technology.
8. Curry, T., Reiner, D.M., Ansolabehere, S., Herzog, H.J., 2004. How aware is the public of carbon capture and storage? Seventh International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7), Vancouver, Canada.
9. Daamen, D., de Best-Waldhober, M., Damen, K., Faaij, A., 2006. Pseudo-opinions on CCS technologies. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), Trondheim, Norway.
10. 2 Capture and Storage Technologies (2006), Centre for Energy and Environmental Studies, Leiden University, Leiden
11. 2-capture and storage technologies. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), Trondheim, Norway.
12. 2 capture and storage, Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands.
13. Devine-Wright P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 22 2 (2005) 125-139
14. Devlin E. Factors affecting public acceptance of wind turbines in Sweden. Wind Engineering 29 6 (2005) 503-511
15. Dietrich H., and Schibeci R. Beyond public perceptions of gene technology: community participation in public policy in Australia. Public Understanding of Science 12 (2004) 381-401
16. 2 Reduction Plan Project Office, Zwolle.
17. Eagly A.H., and Chaiken S. The Psychology of Attitudes (1993), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Forth Worth
18. ECN and NMP, 2006. In: Daniels, B.W., Farla, J.W.M. (Eds.), Optiedocument Energie en Emissies 2010/2020. Petten/Bilthoven, Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands and Dutch Environmental Planning Bureau.
19. EEA, 2004. Impacts of Europe's changing climate, an indicator-based assessment. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
20. Gough, C., Mander, S., 2006. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in the Media. I. G. G. Programme, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
21. Gough C., and Shackley S. Towards a multi-criteria methodology for assessment of geological carbon storage options. Climate Change 74 1-3 (2006) 141-174
22. Hornig S. Reading risk: public response to print media accounts of technological risk. Public Understanding of Science 2 (1993) 95-109
23. Huijts. Public perception of Carbon Dioxide Storage (2003), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven
24. I2L, 2006. The impact of the 'IPCC Special Report on Caron Capture and Storage' on written news reports, I2L-Institute for Innovation and Learning, Utrecht.
25. IPCC, 1995. Climate Change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. In: Watson, R.T., Zinyowera, M.C., Moss, R.H. (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. IPCC, 2001. Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Group I, II and II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, USA.
27. IPCC, 2005. In: Metz, B., Davidson, H.C.d.C.O., Loos, M., Meyer, L.A. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. B. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
28. 2 capture and storage technology: a survey of public opinion to explore influential factors. Seventh International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7), Vancouver, Canada.
29. 2 capture and storage technology. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), Trondheim, Norway.
30. Kaldellis J.K. Social attitude towards wind energy applications in Greece. Energy Policy 33 5 (2005) 595-602
31. Mander, S., Gough, C., 2006. Media framing of new technology: the case of carbon capture and storage. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), Trondheim, Norway.
32. Nisbet M.C., and Scheufele D.A. Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research 29 5 (2002) 584-608
33. OCAP, 2004. Milieuwinst in de glastuinbouw, Organic Carbon dioxide for Assimilation of Plants VOF, Westland (Netherlands).
34. OECD, I., 2001. Nuclear Power in the OECD. International Energy Agency (IEA)/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France.
35. OECD, I., 2003. Technology Innovation, Development and Diffusion. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency, Paris.
36. Palmgren C.R., Morgan M.G., BruinedeBruin W., and Keith D.W. Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide. Environmental Science & Technology 38 24 (2004) 6441-6450
37. Pickett S.E. Japan's nuclear energy policy: from firm commitment to difficult dilemma addressing growing stocks of plutonium, program delays, domestic opposition and international pressure. Energy Policy 30 15 (2002) 1337-1355
38. PWC, D.S. Consultancy and Ecofys, 2001. Eindrapportage 'Schoon Fossiel', 'Laten we samen de eerste stapjes zetten'. PriceWaterhouseCoopers NV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
39. Reiner, D., Curry, T., de Figueiredo, M., Herzog, H., Ansolabehere, S., Itaoka, K., Akai, K., Johnsson, F., Odenberger, M., 2006. An international comparison of public attitudes towards carbon capture and storage technologies. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), Trondheim, Norway.
40. Ryan, C., 1991. Prime Time Activism: Media Strategies for Grassroots Organizing. Boston.
41. Scheufele D.A., and Lewenstein B.V. The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7 (2005) 659-667
42. Shackley S., McLachlan C., and Gough C. The Public Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage (2004), Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Manchester
43. Shackley S., Mander S., and Reiche A. Public perceptions of underground coal gasification in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 34 18 (2006) 3423-3433
44. Sharp, J., Jaccard, M., Keith, D., 2006. Public attitudes toward geological disposal of carbon dioxide in Canada. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), Trondheim, Norway.
45. Siegrist M. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis 20 (2000) 195-204
46. Surrey J., and Huggett C. Opposition to nuclear power: a review of international experience. Energy Policy 4 4 (1976) 286-307
47. Ten Eyck T.A. The media and public opinion on genetics and biotechnology: mirrors, windows, or walls?. Public Understanding of Science 14 (2005) 305-316
48. Terwel, B., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D., 2006. Just say what they expect you to say: the influence of argumentation on trust in organizations. Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), Trondheim, Norway.
49. 2-opslag in de Nederlandse ondergrond, Rijks Geologische Dienst (RGD); TNO Grondwater en Geo-Energie, Haarlem (Netherlands).
50. Turkenburg W.C., Blok K., Hendriks C.A., and Steinberg M. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Carbon Dioxide Removal, Amsterdam (1992), Pergamon Press, Oxford
51. UN, 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations.
52. van de Herik C.W. Groups Support for Policy Making (1998), Delft University of Technology, Delft
53. van der Pligt J. Nuclear Energy and the Public (1992), Blackwell Scientific, Boston
54. van Voorst tot Voorst, Q., 2005. Societal Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in the Netherlands. Department of Innovation Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
55. VROM, 1999. Uitvoeringsnota Klimaatbeleid, Ministry of Housing, Spatial planning, and Environment, The Hague.
56. Wynne, B., 1996. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash, S., Szerszynsky, B., Wynne, B. (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. Sage, London, pp. 165-198.
57. Zaller J. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (1992), Cambridge, UK