Spatial scale and social impacts of biofuel production

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2435-2443

  Van der Horst, Dan ^a   Vermeylen, Saskia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environmental governance; Ethical biofuels; Livelihoods; Multifunctional crops; Scale of production

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; ETHICAL BIOFUELS; LIVELIHOODS; MULTIFUNCTIONAL CROPS; SCALE OF PRODUCTION;

BIOETHANOL; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ETHANOL; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; PUBLIC POLICY; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

BIOFUEL; DEVELOPING WORLD; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ETHANOL; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; SOCIAL IMPACT; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 79956345476     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.029     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Van der Horst D. UK biomass energy since 1990; the mismatch between project types and policy objectives. Energy Policy 2005, 33(5):705-716.
2. Kandpal J.B., Madan M. Jatropha curcas: a renewable source of energy for meeting future energy needs. Renew Energy 1995, 6(2):159-160.
3. Sumathi S., Chai S.P., Mohamed A.R. Utilization of oil palm as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2008, 12(9):2404-2421.
4. The ecologist. Special report on the biofuel revolution. London; March issue 2007.
5. Seedling Agrofuels special issue July 2007, Grain, Barcelona.
6. IOCPG Principles and guidelines for social impact assessment in the USA. The Interorganisational committee on principles and guidelines for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 2003, 21(3):231-250.
7. World Bank Social analysis sourcebook: incorporating social dimensions into bank-supported projects 2002, World Bank, Washington DC.
8. World Bank A user's guide to poverty and social impact analysis 2003, World Bank, Washington DC.
9. Vanclay F. Principles for social impact assessment: a critical comparison between the international and US documents. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2006, 26:3-14.
10. Cole M.A. Air Pollution and 'Dirty' industries: how and why does the composition of manufacturing output change with economic development?. Environ Resource Econ 2000, 17(1):109-123.
11. Cole M.A., Elliot R.J. FDI and the capital intensity of 'dirty sectors': a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Rev Develop Econ 2005, 9(4):530-548.
12. Van der Horst D., Evans J. Carbon claims and energy landscapes: exploring the political ecology of biomass. Landsc Res 2010, 35(2):173-193.
13. Vermeylen S. Land rights and the legacy of colonialism. Community consent and benefit-sharing: learning lessons from the San Hoodia case 2008, Springer Verlag, Berlin. R. Weinberg, R. Chennells (Eds.).
14. Frayne B. Migration and urban survival strategies in Windhoek, Namibia. Geoforum 2004, 35(4):489-505.
15. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ 1998, 25(1):3-15.
16. Gren I., Groth K., Sylven M. Economic values of Danube floodplain. J Environ Manage 1995, 45:333-345.
17. Guo Z., Xiao X., Gan Y., Zheng Y. Ecosystem functions, services and their values - a case study in Xingshan County of China. Ecol Econ 2001, 38:141-154.
18. Browne A.W., Harris P.J.C., Hofny-Collins A.H., Pasiecznik N., Wallace R.R. Organic production and ethical trade: definition, practice and links. Food Policy 2000, 25:69-89.
19. Chambers R., Conway G. Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century 1992, vol. 296. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK, IDS discussion paper.
20. Tauli-Corpuz V., Tamang P. Oil palm and other commercial tree plantations, monocropping: impacts on indigenous peoples' land tenure and resource management systems and livelihoods 2007, United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), New York, E/C.19/2007/CRP.6.
21. Openshaw K. A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise. Biomass Bioenergy 2000, 19:1-15.
22. Koczberski G., Curry G.N. Making a living: land pressures and changing livelihood strategies among oil palm settlers in Papua New Guinea. Agric Syst 2005, 85:324-339.
23. Vermeulen S., Goad N. Towards better practice in smallholder palm oil production 2006, IIED.
24. Henning R.K. Using the indigenous knowledge of Jatropha August 2002, World Bank, IKNotes 47.
25. Friedmann H. From colonialism to green capitalism: social movements and emergence of food regimes. Res Rural Sociol Dev 2006, 11:227-264.
26. Freund P., Martin G. The ecology of the automobile 1993, Black Rose Books, Montreal.
27. Gomex Tovar L., Martin L., Gomez Cruz M.A., Mutersbaugh T. Certified organic agriculture in Mexico: market connections and certification practices in large and small producers. J Rural Stud 2005, 21:461-474.
28. Goodman M.K. Reading fair trade; political ecological imaginary and the moral economy of fair trade foods. Polit Geogr 2004, 23:891-915.
29. Renard M.C. Quality certification, regulation and power in fair trade. J Rural Stud 2005, 21:419-431.
30. Clift R., Mulugetta Y. A plea for common sense (and biomass). Chem Eng (TCE) October 2007, (issue):24-26.