Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): A review

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 38, Issue , 2014, Pages 848-863

  L'Orange Seigo, Selma ^a   Dohle, Simone ^a,b   Siegrist, Michael ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carbon capture; CCS; Public perception; Review; Risk communication

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; REVIEWS;

BRIDGING TECHNOLOGY; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CCS; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; RISK COMMUNICATION; SPONTANEOUS REACTIONS; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY; TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 84904964703     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.017     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. International Energy Agency. Tracking clean energy progress 2013. Paris, France; 2013.
2. International Energy Agency. Energy technology perspectives. Paris, France; 2010.
3. R. Wüstenhagen, M. Wolsink, and M.J. Bürer Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept Energy Policy 35 2007 2683 2691 (Pubitemid 46381418)
4. N.M.A. Huijts, E.J.E. Molin, and L. Steg Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: a review-based comprehensive framework Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16 2012 525 531
5. I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50 1991 179 211
6. SH. Schwartz Normative influences on altruism. Advances in experimental social psychology 1977 Academic Press New York 221 279
7. B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits Policy Sci 9 1978 127 152
8. M. Siegrist The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology Risk Anal 20 2000 195 204
9. M. Siegrist, G. Cvetkovich, and C. Roth Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception Risk Anal 20 2000 353 362 (Pubitemid 30644704)
10. C. Gross Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance Energy Policy 35 2007 2727 2736 (Pubitemid 46381421)
11. P. Slovic, M.L. Finucane, E. Peters, and D.G. MacGregor The affect heuristic Eur J Oper Res 177 2007 1333 1352 (Pubitemid 44709428)
12. R. Cropanzano, H.M. Weiss, J.M.S. Hale, and J. Reb The structure of affect: Reconsidering the relationship between negative and positive affectivity J Manag 29 2003 831 857 (Pubitemid 37453269)
13. N.M.A. Huijts, C.J.H. Midden, and A.L. Meijnders Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage Energy Policy 35 2007 2780 2789 (Pubitemid 46381425)
14. C.R. Palmgren, G.M. Morgan, W. Bruine de Bruin, and D.W. Keith Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide Environ Sci Technol 38 2004 6441 6450
15. C. Gough, I. Taylor, and S. Shackley Burying carbon under the sea: an initial exploration of public opinions Energy Environ 13 2002 883 900 (Pubitemid 38025196)
16. J. Kraeusel, and D. Möst Carbon capture and storage on its way to large-scale deployment: social acceptance and willingness to pay in Germany Energy Policy 49 2012 642 651
17. B.W. Terwel, and D.D.L. Daamen Initial public reactions to carbon capture and storage (CCS): differentiating general and local views Clim Policy 12 2012 288 300
18. B.W. Terwel, F. Harinck, N. Ellemers, and D.D.L. Daamen Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) Risk Anal 29 2009 1129 1140
19. K. Tokushige, K. Akimoto, and T. Tomoda Public perceptions on the acceptance of geological storage of carbon dioxide and information influencing the acceptance Int J Greenh Gas Control 1 2007 101 112 (Pubitemid 46959044)
20. L. Wallquist, V.H.M. Visschers, S. Dohle, and M. Siegrist The role of convictions and trust for public protest potential in the case of CCS Hum Ecol Risk Assess 18 2012 919 932
21. 2 emission reductions in china Energy Policy 38 2010 5281 5289
22. 2 mitigation options Int J Greenh Gas Control 10 2012 169 180
23. 2 storage Int J Greenh Gas Control 3 2009 641 651
24. C. Anderson, J. Schirmer, and N. Abjorensen Exploring CCS community acceptance and public participation from a human and social capital perspective Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 17 2012 687 706
25. P. Ashworth, J. Bradbury, S. Wade, C.F.J.Y. Feenstra, S. Greenberg, and G. Hund et al. What's in store: lessons from implementing CCS Int J Greenh Gas Control 9 2012 402 409
26. 2 storage sites: lessons from five European cases Energy Environ 23 2012 227 248
27. P. Upham, and T. Roberts Public perceptions of CCS: emergent themes in pan-European focus groups and implications for communications Int J Greenh Gas Control 5 2011 1359 1367
28. G. Wong-Parodi, and I. Ray Community perceptions of carbon sequestration: insights from California Environ Res Lett 4 3 2009
29. G. Wong-Parodi, H. Dowlatabadi, T. McDaniels, and X. Isha Influencing attitudes toward carbon capture and sequestration: a social marketing approach Environ Sci Technol 45 2011 6743 6751
30. 2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands Int J Greenh Gas Control 3 2009 322 332
31. L.A. Fleishman, W.B. De Bruin, and M.G. Morgan Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies Risk Anal 30 2010 1399 1410
32. M. de Best-Waldhober, S. Brunsting, and M. Paukovic Public concepts of CCS: understanding of the Dutch general public and its reflection in the media Int J Greenh Gas Control 11 2012 S139 S147
33. S. L'Orange Seigo, L. Wallquist, S. Dohle, and M. Siegrist Communication of CCS monitoring activities may not have a reassuring effect on the public Int J Greenh Gas Control 5 2011 1674 1679
34. J.-P. Moutenet, K. Bédard, and M. Malo Public awareness and opinion on CCS in the province of Québec, Canada Greenh Gases Sci Technol 2 2012 126 135
35. C. Oltra, R. Sala, and A. Boso The influence of information on individuals reaction to CCS technologies. Results from an experimental online survey research Greenh Gases Sci Technol 2 2012 209 215
36. L. Wallquist, V.H.M. Visschers, and M. Siegrist Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of ccs Environ Sci Technol 44 2010 6557 6562
37. 2 storage Risk Anal 29 2009 743 751
38. E. Miller, L. Bell, and L. Buys Public understanding of carbon sequestration in Australia: socio-demographic predictors of knowledge, engagement and trust Aust J Emerg Technol Soc 5 2007 15 33
39. E. Miller, J. Summerville, L. Buys, and L. Bell Initial public perceptions of carbon geosequestration: implications for engagement and environmental risk communication strategies Int J Glob Env. Issues 2008 147 164 (Pubitemid 351301202)
40. E. ter Mors, M.W.H. Weenig, N. Ellemers, and D.D.L. Daamen Effective communication about complex environmental issues: perceived quality of information about carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) depends on stakeholder collaboration J Environ Psychol 30 2010 347 357
41. C. Oltra, R. Sala, R. Sol'a, M.D. Masso, and G. Rowe Lay perceptions of carbon capture and storage technology Int J Greenh Gas Control 4 2010 698 706
42. B.W. Terwel, F. Harinck, N. Ellemers, and D.D.L. Daamen How organizational motives and communications affect public trust in organizations: the case of carbon dioxide capture and storage J Environ Psychol 29 2009 290 299
43. B.W. Terwel, F. Harinck, N. Ellemers, and D.D.L. Daamen Voice in political decision-making: the effect of group voice on perceived trustworthiness of decision makers and subsequent acceptance of decisions J Exp Psychol-Appl 16 2010 173 186
44. B.W. Terwel, E. ter Mors, and D.D.L. Daamen It's not only about safety: beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a ccs project in Barendrecht Int J Greenh Gas Control 9 2012 41 51
45. T.C. Earle, and G.T. Cvetkovich Social trust: toward a cosmopolitan society 1995 Praeger Westport
46. P. Ashworth, A. Pisarski, and K. Thambimuthu Public acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage in a proposed demonstration area Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 223 2009 299 304
47. S. L'Orange Seigo, S. Dohle, and M. Siegrist The effect of figures in CCS communication Int J Greenh Gas Control 16 2013 83 90
48. S. Shackley, C. McLachlan, and C. Gough The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey Clim Policy 4 2005 377 398 (Pubitemid 40837088)
49. 2 geological storage for global warming mitigation in Japan Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12 2007 1237 1251 (Pubitemid 47087452)
50. L. Wallquist, V.H.M. Visschers, S. Dohle, and M. Siegrist Adapting communication to the public's intuitive understanding of CCS Greenh Gases Sci Technol 1 2011 83 91
51. L. Wallquist, V.H.M. Visschers, and M. Siegrist Lay concepts on CCS deployment in Switzerland based on qualitative interviews Int J Greenh Gas Control 3 2009 652 657
52. S.R. Carley, R.M. Krause, D.C. Warren, J.A. Rupp, and J.D. Graham Early public impressions of terrestrial carbon capture and storage in a coal-intensive state Environ Sci Technol 46 2012 7086 7093
53. M. Ha-Duong, A. Nadai, and A.S. Campos A survey on the public perception of CCS in France Int J Greenh Gas Control 3 2009 633 640
54. D.M. Reiner, T.E. Curry, M.A. De Figueiredo, H.J. Herzog, S.D. Ansolabehere, and K. Itaoka et al. American exceptionalism? Similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warming Environ Sci Technol 40 2006 2093 2098
55. L. Sjöberg Perceived risk and tampering with nature J Risk Res 3 2000 353 367
56. L. Wallquist, S. L'Orange Seigo, V.H.M. Visschers, and M. Siegrist Public acceptance of CCS system elements: a conjoint measurement Int J Greenh Gas Control 6 2012 77 83
57. V.H.M. Visschers, C. Keller, and M. Siegrist Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: investigating an explanatory model Energy Policy 39 2011 3621 3629
58. V.H.M. Visschers, and M. Siegrist Fair play in energy policy decisions: procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants Energy Policy 46 2012 292 300
59. R.E. Kasperson, O. Renn, P. Slovic, H.S. Brown, J. Emel, and R. Goble et al. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework Risk Anal 8 1988 177 187
60. J.X. Kasperson, R.E. Kasperson, N. Pidgeon, and P. Slovic The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. The social amplification of risk 2003 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 13 46