Global potential for biomass and carbon dioxide capture, transport and storage up to 2050

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 11, Issue , 2012, Pages 117-132

  Koornneef, Joris ^a   van Breevoort, Pieter ^a   Hamelinck, Carlo ^a   Hendriks, Chris ^a   Hoogwijk, Monique ^c   Koop, Klaas ^d   Koper, Michèle ^a   Dixon, Tim ^b   Camps, Ameena ^b  

^a Ecofys bv   (Netherlands)

^b Stoke Orchard   (United Kingdom)

^c Gemeente Utrecht   (Netherlands)

^d ROYAL HASKONINGDHV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

BE CCS; BIO CCS; Bio energy; Carbon capture and storage; Global potential

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES;

ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATION; BIO ENERGY; BIO-CCS; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE; GLOBAL POTENTIAL; QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATES; REDUCTION POTENTIAL;

CARBON CAPTURE;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); GREENHOUSE GAS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REDUCTION;

EID: 84865462155     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Azar C., Lindgren K., et al. Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass - costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere. Climatic Change 2006, 74(1):47-79.
2. Bauen A., Berndes G., et al. Bioenergy - A Sustainable and Reliable Energy Source - A Review of Status and Prospects IEA Bioenergy Task 39 2009, ECN, E4tech, Chalmers University of Technology, Copernicus Institute of the University of Utrecht. http://www.task39.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=8IsypIOAwXs%3d%26tabid=4426%26language=en-US.
3. 2 from a bio-fuel distillery: CPER Artenay project. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(1):3927-3934.
4. COFITECK (2008). Co-firing - from research to practice: technology and biomass supply know - how promotion in Central and Eastern Europe: Co-Firing Technology S-O-T-A review study. Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme.
5. Cornelissen S., Koper M., et al. The role of bioenergy in a fully sustainable global energy system. Biomass and Bioenergy 2012, 41(0):21-33.
6. COWI (2009). Technical assistance for an overview of international trade opportunities for sustainable biomass and biofuels, ECN Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, Copernicus Institute at Utrecht University, Forest and Landscape Denmark at the University of Copenhagen, COWI A/S and ControlUnion Certifications.
7. CSLF (2008). Comparison between Methodologies Recommended for Estimation of CO2 Storage Capacity in Geological Media - Phase III Report - S. Bachu, Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF), CSLF Task Force on CO2 Storage Capacity Estimation and the USDOE Capacity and Fairways Subgroup of the Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program.
8. 2 capture and storage. Part A: review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2006, 32(2):215.
9. Davison J., Thambimuthu K. An overview of technologies and costs of carbon dioxide capture in power generation. IMechE Part A: J. Power and Energy 2009, 223.
10. de Visser E., Hendriks C., et al. PlantaCap: a ligno-cellulose bio-ethanol plant with CCS. Energy Procedia 2011, 4(0):2941-2949.
11. Dehue B. Palm Oil and its By-Products as a Renewable Energy Source Potential, Sustainability and Governance 2006, Environmental policy group Wageningen University (WUR).
12. Dehue B., Meyer S., et al. Responsible Cultivation Areas - Identification and Certification of Feedstock Production with a Low Risk of Indirect Effects 2010, Commissioned by: BP, Neste Oil, Shell Global Solutions, Utrecht, Ecofys.
13. EBTP/ZEP (2012). Biomass with CO2 Capture and Storage (Bio-CCS) - The WAY Forward for Europe. Brussels, Belgium, European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants (ZEP), European Biofuels Technology Platform (ETBP).
14. EC Sustainability Criteria & Certification Systems for Biomass Production 2008, DG TREN, European Commission, Biomass technology group, Brussels.
15. EC (2009). Technical assistance for an evaluation of international schemes to promote biomass sustainability. Brussels, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, European Commission, ECN, Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, Forest & Landscape Denmark, University of Copenhagen, COWI A/S, Control Union Certifications.
16. EC Report from the Commission on Indirect Land-Use Change (ILUC) Related to Biofuels and Bioliquids 2010, European Commission, Brussels.
17. Ecofys (2007a). Future scenarios for first and second generation biofuels. C. Hamelinck and M. Hoogwijk, Ecofys.
18. Ecofys (2007b). Plantacap: a ligno cellulose bioethanol plant with CCS-Confidential. C. Hendriks, C. Hamelinck, E.v.d. Brug et al., Ecofys.
19. Greenpeace E.R.E.C. World Energy [R] Evolution - A Sustainable World Energy Outlook 2010, European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), Greenpeace.
20. Faaij A. Modern biomass conversion technologies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2006, 11:343-375.
21. Fabbri, A., Bonijoly, D., et al., 2010. CPER Artenay Environmental Benefits and Economical Feasibility of Biomass - CCS Under Geological Constraints BRGM\GéO\G2R.
22. Fernando R. Co-gasification and the Indirect Co-Firing of Coal and Biomass 2009, IEA Clean Coal Centre.
23. Florentinus A., Hamelinck C., et al. Worldwide Potential of Aquatic Biomass 2008, Utrecht, Ecofys.
24. GeoCapacity, 2009. Assessing European Capacity for Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide, EC - Sixth Framework Programme/Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland.
25. Groenenberg H., Dixon T. Using Carbon Markets to Advance Negative Emissions from Biomass and CCS. GHGT-10 2010, Energy Procedia - Elsevier, Amsterdam.
26. Hamelinck C., Hoogwijk M. Future Scenarios for First and Second Generation Biofuels 2007, Ecofys.
27. Hendriks, et al. Global Carbon Dioxide Storage Potential and Costs 2004, Utrecht, Ecofys, TNO for Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu.
28. Hoogwijk et al., 2010. Global Potential of Biomass for Energy, in Global Energy Assessment - Preliminary results. More info: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/ENE/GEA/index_gea.html.
29. Hoogwijk, M., 2004. On the Global and Regional Potential of Renewable Energy Sources. PhD, Utrecht University.
30. IEA Technology roadmap carbon capture and storage. International Energy Agency 2009.
31. IEA Key world energy statistics. International Energy Agency, Paris, France 2011.
32. IEA, 2011b. Prospect of limiting the global increase in temperature to 2°C is getting bleaker. Retrieved from: (30 May 2011). http://www.iea.org/index_info.asp%3Fid=1959.
33. IEA ETSAP Biomass for heat and power. IEA energy technology system analysis program. International Energy Agency 2010.
34. IEA ETSAP Coal-fired power. IEA energy technology system analysis program. International Energy Agency 2010.
35. IEA ETSAP Liquid fuels production from coal & gas. IEA energy technology system analysis program. International Energy Agency 2010.
36. IEA GHG, 2009a November. Biomass CCS Study IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG).
37. IEA GHG, 2009b. CO2 storage in depleted gas fields. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG).
38. IEA/OECD Biofuel production. IEA energy technology essentials. International Energy Agency 2007.
39. IEA/OECD Biomass for power generation and CHP. IEA energy technology essentials. International Energy Agency 2007.
40. 2 capture and storage - a key carbon abatement option. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. International Energy Agency 2008, 266.
41. IPCC IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2005, 442. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA. B. Metz, O. Davidson, Coninck H.C.d., M. Loos, L.A. Meyer (Eds.).
42. IPCC, 2006. Chapter 2: Stationary combustion. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Volume 2 - Energy IGES, Japan, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme.
43. JRC, 2008. Well to Wheel V3c November, Joint Research Centre.
44. Junginger M., de Visser E., et al. Technological learning in bioenergy systems. Energy Policy 2006, 34(18):4024-4041.
45. Knoope, M., 2010. The Technological and Economic Prospects of Co-Gasification of Coal and Biomass in the Short, Medium and Long Term. MSc., Energy Science, Utrecht University.
46. Koornneef, J.M., 2010. Shifting streams - on the Health, Safety and Environmental Impacts of Carbon dioxide Capture, Transport and Storage. PhD, Utrecht University.
47. 2 capture and storage: an Illinois case study. Energy and Environmental Science 2010, 3(1):1-9.
48. 2 capture and storage from a bioethanol plant: carbon and energy footprint and economic assessment. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5(5):1220-1231.
49. Luckow, P., Dooley, J., et al., 2010. Biomass Energy for Transport and Electricity: Large Scale Utilization Under Low CO2 Concentration Scenarios, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.
50. 2 emissions. Biomass and Bioenergy 2003, 25(3):273-285.
51. NETBIOCOF, 2006. New and advanced concepts in renewable energy technology Biomass - D14: First state-of-the-art report. Integrated European Network for Biomass Co-firing.
52. NETL/DOE Carbon Sequestration Atlas of the United States and Canada (Atlas II) 2008, Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory.
53. REN21, 2010. Renewables 2010 Global Status Report, Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century.
54. Resch G., Held A., et al. Potentials and prospects for renewable energies at global scale. Energy Policy 2008, (36):4048-4056.
55. Rhodes J.S., Keith D.W. Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage. Biomass and Bioenergy 2005, (29):440-450.
56. Riahi K., Rubin E.S., et al. Technological learning for carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Energy Economics 2004, 26(4):539.
57. Smeets, E., Faaij et al., A., 2005. The impact of sustainability criteria on the costs and potentials of bioenergy production - an exploration of the impact of the implementation of sustainability criteria on the costs and potential of bioenergy production, applied for case studies in Brazil and Ukraine.
58. van den Broek, M.A., 2010. Modelling Approaches to Assess and Design the Deployment of CO2 Capture, Transport, and Storage. PhD, Utrecht University.
59. van Vliet O.P.R., Faaij A.P.C., et al. Fischer-Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: a carbon, energy flow and cost analysis'. Energy Conversion and Management 2009, (50):855-876.
60. van Vuuren D.P., Vliet J.v., et al. Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints. Energy Policy 2009, (37):4220-4230.
61. Vrijmoed, S., Hoogwijk et al., M., 2010. Learning rates of low carbon technologies - confidential Ecofys.
62. Wallquist L., Seigo S.L.O., et al. Public acceptance of CCS system elements: a conjoint measurement. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 6(0):77-83.
63. WBA WBA Position Paper on Global Potential of Sustainable Biomass for Energy 2009, World Bioenergy Association.
64. Xu Y., Isom L., et al. Adding value to carbon dioxide from ethanol fermentations. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101(10):3311-3319.