Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals

Science

Volumn 311, Issue 5760, 2006, Pages 506-508

  Farrell, Alexander E ^a   Plevin, Richard J ^a   Turner, Brian T ^a,b   Jones, Andrew D ^a   O'Hare, Michael ^b   Kammen, Daniel M ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ETHANOL; GAS EMISSIONS; GASOLINE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT;

BIOFUEL USE; CELLULOSIC TECHNOLOGY; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS;

FUEL SYSTEMS;

ALCOHOL; BIOFUEL; GASOLINE; PETROLEUM;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; BIOFUEL; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GREENHOUSE GAS; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELLULOSE; ENERGY-GENERATING RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT; ETHANOL; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 31544462628     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1121416     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. T. E. Wirth, C. B. Gray, J. D. Podesta, Foreign Aff. 82, 132 (2003).
2. R. A. Kerr, R. F. Service, Science 309, 101 (2005).
3. S. C. Davis, S. W. Diegel, Transportation Energy Data Book (Technical Report No. ORNL-6973, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2004).
4. If only cellulosic ethanol production capacity is added, only 4.8 billion gallons will be required because of preferential credit provisions.
5. "Implications of Increased Ethanol Production for U.S. Agriculture" (Report No. 10-05, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 2005). Also available at www.fapri.missouri.edu/outreach/publications/2005/FAPRI_UMC_Report_10_05.pdf.
6. By convention, photosynthetic energy is ignored in this calculation.
7. H. Shapouri, J. A. Duffield, M. Wang, Trans. ASAC 46, 959 (2003).
8. R. S. Chambers, R. A. Herendeen, J. J. Joyce, P. S. Penner, Science 206, 789 (1979).
9. C. J. Cleveland, Energy 30, 769 (2005).
10. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online. Additional information is available, including the working EBAMM model, at http://socrates.berkeley.edu/-rael/EBAMM.
11. T. Patzek, Crit Rev. Plant Sci. 23, 519 (2004).
12. D. Pimentel, T. Patzek, Nat. Resour. Res. 14, 65 (2005).
13. M. E. D. De Oliveira, B. E. Vaughan, E. J. Rykiel, Bioscience 55, 593 (2005).
14. H. Shapouri, A. McAloon, "The 2001 net energy balance of corn ethanol" (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 2004). Also available at www.usda.gov/oce/oepnu.
15. M. Graboski, "Fossil energy use in the manufacture of corn ethanol" (National Corn Growers Association, Washington, DC, 2002). Also available at www.ncga.com/ethanol/main.
16. M. Wang, "Development and use of GREET 1.6 fuel-cycle model for transportation fuels and vehicle technologies" (Tech. Rep. ANL/ESD/TM-163, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 2001). Also available at www.transportation.anL.gov/pdfs/TA/153.pdf.
17. S. Kim, B. E. Dale, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 7, 237 (2002).
18. M. A. Delucchi, "Conceptual and methodological issues in lifecycle analyses of transportation fuels" (Tech. Rep. UCD-ITS-RR-04-45, Univ. of California, Davis, 2004). Also available at www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/ 2004/UCD-ITS-RR-04-45.pdf.
19. Factors eliminated were labor transportation, labor food energy, and process water energy. The first two were deemed outside the system boundaries. Process water energy was included in one study but was insufficiently documented. Factors added were farm machinery energy, inputs packaging, and effluent processing energy. The metric for petroleum use included crude oil used as a feedstock for gasoline, and the metric for GHGs included end-use (tailpipe) fossil emissions (10).
20. S. Kim, B. E. Dale, Biomass Bioenergy 29, 426 (2005).
21. E. Tegtmeier, M. Duffy, Int. J. Agric. Sustainability 2, 1 (2004).
22. More information is available at www.redtrailenergyllc.com.
23. R. D. Perlack, L. L. Wright, A. Turhollow, R. Graham, B. Stokes, D. Erbach, "Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and byproducts industry: The technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply" (Tech. Rep. ORNL/TM-2006/66, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2005). Also available at http://feedstockreview.ornl.gov/pdf/billion_ton_vision.pdf.
24. L. B. Lave, W. Griffin, H. McLean, Issues Sci. Technol 18, 73 (2001).
25. This research was made possible through support from the Energy Foundation and the Karsten Family Foundation (both to D.M.K.) and NSF's Climate Decision Making Center at Carnegie Mellon University (SES-034578) (to A.E.F.) and Graduate Research Fellowship program (to A.D.J.). The authors thank J. Thompson, D. Greene, M. DeLucchi, M. Wang, and an anonymous reviewer for assistance and valuable comments.