The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 885-900

  Li, Lan ^a   Gao, Fei ^a  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

feedback; peer assessment; performance; students learning levels

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930607405     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1048185     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ANOVA Options. n.d. http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/rentrpt/v1r0m1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.swg.ba.cognos.ug_cr_rptstd.10.1.1.doc%2Fc_id_obj_anova.html.
2. A.Bandura, 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. E.B.Bauman, 2012. Game-Based Teaching and Simulation in Nursing & Healthcare. New York: Springer.
4. D.Brown, 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practice. New York: Longman.
5. S.Brown,, C.Rust, and G.Gibbs. 1994. Strategies for Diversifying Assessment in Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
6. S.Brutus,, M.B.Donia, and S.Ronen. 2013. “Can Business Students Learn to Evaluate Better? Evidence from Repeated Exposure to a Peer-evaluation System.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12 (1): 18–31.
7. C.H.Chen, 2010. “The Implementation and Evaluation of a Mobile Self-and Peer-assessment System.” Computers & Education 55 (1): 229–236.
8. W.Cheng,, and M.Warren. 2005. “Peer Assessment of Language Proficiency.” Language Testing 22 (1): 93–121.10.1191/0265532205lt298oa
9. P.Davies, 2000. “Computerized Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Training International 37 (4): 346–355.10.1080/135580000750052955
10. F.Dochy,, M.Segers, and D.M.A.Sluijsmans. 1999. “The Use of Self-, Peer-, and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A Review.” Studies in Higher Education 24 (3): 331–350.10.1080/03075079912331379935
11. L.Espinoza,, and A.Winsler. 2005. “Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD).” In Encyclopedia of Human Development, edited by N.Salkind, 1344–1346. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. N.Falchikov, 2007. “The Place of Peers in Learning and Assessment.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term, edited by D.Boud and N.Falchikov, 128–143. New York: Routledge.
13. N.Falchikov,, and D.Boud. 1989. “Student Self-assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 59 (4): 395–430.10.3102/00346543059004395
14. M.Freeman, 1995. “Peer Assessment by Groups of Group Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 20 (3): 289–300.
15. G.Gibbs, 1999. “Using Assessment Strategically to Change the Way Students Learn.” In Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches, edited by S.Brown and A.Glasner, 41–53. Buckingham: Open University Press.
16. S.Hanrahan,, and G.Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students’ View’s.” Higher Education Research and Development 20 (1): 53–70.10.1080/07294360123776
17. M.C.Hersam,, M.Luna, and G.Light. 2004. “Implementation of Interdisciplinary Group Learning and Peer Assessment in a Nanotechnology Engineering Course.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (1): 49–57.10.1002/jee.2004.93.issue-1
18. S.R.Hiltz,, and B.Wellman. 1997. “Asynchronous Learning Networks as a Virtual Classroom.” Communications of the ACM 40 (9): 44–49.10.1145/260750.260764
19. G.Keppel,, and T.D.Wickens. 2004. Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
20. K.Kwan,, and R.Leung. 1996. “Tutor versus Peer Group Assessment of Student Performance in a Simulation Training Exercise.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 21 (3): 205–214.
21. L.Li, (2012). How do Students of Diverse Achievement Levels Benefit from Peer Assessment? International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning 5 (2). http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol5/iss2/14.
22. L.Li,, X.Liu, and A.L.Steckelberg. 2010. “Assessor or Assessee: How Student Learning Improves by Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback.” British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (3): 525–536.10.1111/bjet.2010.41.issue-3
23. L.Li,, X.Liu, and Y.Zhou. 2012. “Give and Take: A Re-analysis of Assessor and Assessee’s Roles in Technology-facilitated Peer Assessment.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (3): 376–384.10.1111/bjet.2012.43.issue-3
24. L.Li,, and A.L.Steckelberg. 2004. “Using Peer Feedback to Enhance Student Meaningful Learning.” In Proceedings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology International Conference, 576–587. Chicago, IL.
25. L.Li,, and A.L.Steckelberg. 2005. “Impact of Technology-mediated Peer Assessment on Student Project Quality.” In Proceedings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology International Conference, 307–313. Orlando, FL.
26. L.Li,, A.L.Steckelberg, and S., Srinivasan. 2008. “Utilizing Peer Interactions to Promote Learning through a Web-based Peer Assessment System.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 34 (2). http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/497/228.
27. X.Liu,, and L.Li. 2013. “Assessment Training Effects on Student Assessment Skills and Task Performance in a Technology-facilitated Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (3): 275–292.
28. E.Maclellan,, and R.Soden. 2008. “Successful Learners, Confident Individuals, Responsible Citizens and Effective Contributors to Society: Exploring the Nature of Learning and its Implications in Curriculum for Excellence.” Scottish Educational Review 40 (2): 29–37.
29. R.McDonald,, D.Boud, J.Francis, and A.Gonczi. 1995. New Perspectives on Assessment. Paris: UNESCO.
30. W.A.Mehrens,, W.J.Popham, and J.M.Ryan. 1998. “How to Prepare Students for Performance Assessments.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 17 (1): 18–22.
31. P.Orsmond,, S.Merry, and K.Reiling. 1996. “The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 21 (3): 239–250.
32. M.Patri, 2002. “The Influence of Peer Feedback on Self- and Peer-assessment of Oral Skills.” Language Testing 19 (2): 109–131.10.1191/0265532202lt224oa
33. N.Pope, 2001. “An Examination of the Use of Peer Rating for Formative Assessment in the Context of the Theory of Consumption Values.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (3): 235–246.
34. P.Race, 2007. The Lecturer’s Toolkit. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
35. T.S.Roberts, 2004. Online Collaborative Learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.10.4018/978-1-59140-174-2
36. J.Robinson, 1999. “Computer-assisted Peer Review.” In Computer-assisted Assessment in Higher Education, edited by S.Brown, J.Bull, and P.Race, 95–102. London: Kogan Page.
37. H.Somervell, 1993. “Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education: The Case for Self-, Peer and Collaborative Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 18 (3): 221–233.
38. Y.T.Sung,, K.E.Chang, S.K.Chiou, and H.T.Hou. 2005. “The Design and Application of a Web-based Self-and Peer-assessment System.” Computers & Education 45 (2): 187–202.
39. K.Topping, 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276.10.3102/00346543068003249
40. K.Topping,, E.F.Smith, I.Swanson, and A.Elliot. 2000. “Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing between Postgraduate Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2): 149–169.
41. R.Van Der Stuyf, 2002. Scaffolding as a Teaching Strategy. Adolescent Learning and Development. Section 0500A. condor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/~group4/Van%20Der%20Stuyf/Van%20Der%20Stuyf%20Paper.doc.
42. M.Van Zundert,, D.Sluijsmans, and J.Van Merriënboer. 2010. “Effective Peer Assessment Processes: Research Findings and Future Directions.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 270–279.
43. C.Violato,, and J.Lockyer. 2006. “Self and Peer Assessment of Pediatricians, Psychiatrists and Medicine Specialists: Implications for Self-directed Learning.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 11 (3): 235–244.10.1007/s10459-005-5639-0
44. L.S.Vygotsky, 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Y.Wang,, H.Li, Y.Feng, Y.Jiang, and Y.Liu. 2012. “Assessment of Programming Language Learning based on Peer Code Review Model: Implementation and Experience Report.” Computers & Education 59 (2): 412–422.
46. N.M.Webb, 1997. “Assessing Students in Small Collaborative Groups.” Theory Into Practice 36 (4): 205–213.10.1080/00405849709543770
47. N.M.Webb,, K.M.Nemer, A.W.Chizhik, and B.Sugrue. 1998. “Equity Issues in Collaborative Group Assessment: Group Composition and Performance.” American Educational Research Journal 35 (4): 607–651.10.3102/00028312035004607
48. Y.Zhao, 1998. “The Effects of Anonymity on Computer-mediated Peer Review.” International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 4 (4): 311–345.