Mucoadhesion and characterization of mucoadhesive properties

Mucosal Delivery of Biopharmaceuticals: Biology, Challenges and Strategies

Volumn 9781461495246, Issue , 2014, Pages 35-58

  Yu, Tao ^a   Andrews, Gavin P ^a   Jones, David S ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flow; Mucin; Mucoadhesion; Mucoadhesive characterization; Tensile

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930017783     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9524-6_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (118)

1. Kinloch A the science of adhesion. J Mater Sci. 1982;17(3):617-51.
2. Park K, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral-controlled drug delivery: method to study bioadhesion. Int J Pharm. 1984;19(2):107-27.
3. Leung S-HS, Robinson JR the contribution of anionic polymer structural features to mucoadhesion. J Control Release. 1988;5(3):223-31.
4. Smart JD the basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1556-68.
5. Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;71(3):505-18.
6. Park K. A new approach to study mucoadhesion: colloidal gold staining. Int J Pharm. 1989;53(3):209-17.
7. Bernkop-Schnürch A, Steininger S. Synthesis and characterisation of mucoadhesive thiolated polymers. Int J Pharm. 2000;194(2):239-47.
8. Khutoryanskiy VV. Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromol Biosci. 2011;11(6):748-64.
9. Scrivener CA, SchantzCW. Penicillin; new methods for its use in dentistry. JAm Dent Assoc. 1947;35(9):644-7.
10. Baloglu E, Senyigit ZA, Karavana SY, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Strategies to prolong the intravaginal residence time of drug delivery systems. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2009;12(3):312-36.
11. Allen A. Structure and function of gastrointestinal mucus. In: Johnson L, editor. Physiology of the gastroenterology tract. NewYork: Raven; 1981. pp. 617-39.
12. Moran DT, Rowley JC 3rd, Jafek BW, Lovell MA the fine structure of the olfactory mucosa in man. J Neurocytol. 1982;11(5):721-46.
13. Burkitt HG, Young B, Heath JW. Histologia Funcional. 3rd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1994.
14. Neutra M, Forstner J. Gastrointestinal mucus: synthesis, secretion, and function. In: Johnson L, editor. Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. NewYork: Raven; 1987. pp. 975-1009.
15. Bansil R, Turner BS. Mucin structure, aggregation, physiological functions and biomedical applications. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;11(2):164-70.
16. Stefan R-I, Draghici I, Baiulescu G-E. Determination of urinary oxalate using oxalateselective membrane electrodes. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2000;65(1):250-2.
17. Gipson IK, Ho SB, Spurr-Michaud SJ, Tisdale AS, Zhan Q, Torlakovic E, Pudney J, Anderson DJ, ToribaraNW, Hill J. Mucin genes expressed by human female reproductive tract epithelia. Biol Reprod. 1997;56(4):999-1011.
18. Dasari S, Pereira L, ReddyAP, Michaels JE, Lu X, JacobT, ThomasA, Rodland M, Roberts CT. Jr, Gravett MG, Nagalla SR. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of human cervical-vaginal fluid. J Proteome Res. 2007;6(4):1258-68.
19. Chiappin S, Antonelli G, Gatti R, De Palo EF. Saliva specimen: a new laboratory tool for diagnostic and basic investigation. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;383(1-2):30-40.
20. Spurr-Michaud S, Argueso P, Gipson I. Assay of mucins in human tear fluid. Exp Eye Res. 2007;84(5):939-50.
21. ToribaraNW, RobertonAM, Ho SB, KuoWL, Gum E, Hicks JW, Gum JR Jr, Byrd JC, Siddiki B, Kim YS. Human gastric mucin. Identification of a unique species by expression cloning. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(8):5879-85.
22. Marriot C, Gregory N. Mucus physiology and pathology. In: Lenaerts V, Gurny R, editor. Bioadhesive drug delivery systems. Boca Raton: CRC; 1990. pp. 1-24.
23. Mortazavi S, Carpenter B, Smart J. A comparative study on the role played by mucus glycoproteins in the rheological behaviour of the mucoadhesive/mucosal interface. Int J Pharm. 1993;94(1):195-201.
24. Mortazavi SA, Smart JD. An investigation into the role of water movement and mucus gel dehydration in mucoadhesion. J Control Release. 1993;25(3):197-203.
25. Rossi S, Bonferoni M, Ferrari F, Bertoni M, Caramella C. Characterization of mucin interaction with three viscosity grades of sodium carboxymethylcellulose. Comparison between rheological and tensile testing. Eur J Pharm Sci. 1996;4(3):189-96.
26. Edsman K, Hägerstrom H. Pharmaceutical applications of mucoadhesion for the non-oral routes. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2005;57(1):3-22.
27. Capra RH, Baruzzi AM, Quinzani LM, Strumia MC. Rheological, dielectric and diffusion analysis of mucin/carbopol matrices used in amperometric biosensors. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2007;124(2):466-76.
28. Yang X, Robinson JR. Bioadhesion in mucosal drug delivery. In: Okano T, editor. Biorelated polymers and gels: controlled release and applications in biomedical engineering. San Diego: Academic;1998. pp. 135-192.
29. Riley RG, Smart JD, Tsibouklis J, Dettmar PW, Hampson F, Davis JA, Kelly G, Wilber WR. An investigation of mucus/polymer rheological synergism using synthesised and characterised poly(acrylic acid)s. Int J Pharm. 2001;217(1-2):87-100.
30. Fiebrig I, Harding SE, Rowe AJ, Hyman SC, Davis SS. Transmission electron microscopy studies on pig gastric mucin and its interactions with chitosan. Carbohydr Polym. 1995;28(3):239-44.
31. Van Klinken BJ, Dekker J, Büller HA, Einerhand AW. Mucin gene structure and expression: protection vs. adhesion. Am J Physiol. 1995;269(5 Pt 1):G613-27.
32. Bell S, Xu G, Khatri I, Wang R, Rahman S, Forstner J. N-linked. oligosaccharides play a role in disulphide-dependent dimerization of intestinal mucin Muc2. Biochem J. 2003;373:893-900.
33. Davies JM, Viney C. Water-mucin phases: conditions for mucus liquid crystallinity. Thermochim Acta. 1998;315(1):39-49.
34. Perez-Vilar J, Hill RL. Mucin family of glycoproteins. In: Lennarz WJ, Lane MD, editors. Encyclopedia of biological chemistry. Oxford: Academic/Elsevier; 2004. pp. 758-764.
35. Bettelheim FA, Hashimoto Y, Pigman W. Light-scattering studies of bovine submaxillary mucin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1962;63:235-42.
36. Bettelheim F, Scheinthal B. Light scattering of mucins in concentrated solutions. J Polym Sci C Polym Symp. 1970;30:117-24
37. Harding SE the macrostructure of mucus glycoproteins in solution. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1989;47:345-81.
38. Bansil R, Stanley E, LaMont JT. Mucin biophysics. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995;57:635-57.
39. Bastardo L, Claesson P, Brown W. Interactions between mucin and alkyl sodium sulfates in solution. A light scattering study. Langmuir. 2002;18(10):3848-53.
40. Dua VK, Rao BN, Wu SS, Dube VE, Bush CA. Characterization of the oligosaccharide alditols from ovarian cyst mucin glycoproteins of blood group A using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and high field 1H NMR spectroscopy. J Biol Chem. 1986;261(4):1599-1608.
41. Naganagowda G, Gururaja T, Satyanarayana J, Levine M. NMR analysis of human salivary mucin (MUC7) derived O-linked model glycopeptides: comparison of structural features and carbohydrate-peptide interactions. J Peptide Res. 1999;54(4):290-310.
42. Thomsson KA, Prakobphol A, Leffler H, Reddy MS, Levine MJ, Fisher SJ, Hansson GC the salivary mucin MG1 (MUC5B) carries a repertoire of unique oligosaccharides that is large and diverse. Glycobiology. 2002;12(1):1-14.
43. Kinarsky L, Suryanarayanan G, Prakash O, Paulsen H, Clausen H, Hanisch FG, Hollingsworth MA, Sherman S. Conformational studies on the MUC1 tandem repeat glycopeptides. implication for the enzymatic O-glycosylation of the mucin protein core. Glycobiology. 2003;13(12):929-39.
44. Paz HB, Tisdale AS, DanjoY, Spurr-Michaud SJ, Argueso P, Gipson IK the role of calcium in mucin packaging within goblet cells. Exp Eye Res. 2003;77(1):69-75.
45. McMaster TJ, Berry M, CorfieldAP, Miles MJ. Atomic force microscopy of the submolecular architecture of hydrated ocular mucins. Biophys J. 1999;77(1):533-41.
46. Hong Z, Chasan B, Bansil R, Turner BS, Bhaskar KR, Afdhal NH. Atomic force microscopy reveals aggregation of gastric mucin at low pH. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(6):3458-66.
47. Round AN, McMaster TJ, Miles MJ, Corfield AP, Berry M the isolated MUC5AC gene product from human ocular mucin displays intramolecular conformational heterogeneity. Glycobiology. 2007;17(6):578-85.
48. Haugstad KE, Gerken TA, Stokke BT, Dam TK, Brewer CF, Sletmoen M. Enhanced selfassociation of mucins possessing the T and Tn carbohydrate cancer antigens at the singlemolecule level. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(5):1400-9.
49. Young T. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. 1805;95:65-87.
50. Mikos A, Peppas N. Systems for controlled release of drugs. V: bioadhesive systems. STP Pharma Sci. 1986;2(19):705-15.
51. Gandhi R, Robinson JR. Bioadhesion in drug delivery. Indian J Pharm Sci. 1988;50(3): 145-52.
52. Gu JM, Robinson JR, Leung SH. Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure-property relationships. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1988;5(1):21-67.
53. Jimenez-Castellanos MR, Zia H, Rhodes C. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1993;19(1-2):143-94.
54. Shaikh R, Raj Singh TR, Garland MJ, Woolfson AD, Donnelly RF. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011;3(1):89-100.
55. Shafrin EG, ZismanWA. Constitutive relations in the wetting of low energy surfaces and the theory of the retraction method of preparing monolayers1. J Phys Chem. 1960;64(5):519-24.
56. Pritchard WH the role of hydrogen bonding in adhesion. In: Alder D, editor. Aspects of adhesion. London: London University Press; 1970. pp. 11-23.
57. Krishnakumar P. Wetting and spreading phenomena, physics 563 Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois; 2010.
58. Peppas NA, Sahlin JJ. Hydrogels as mucoadhesive and bioadhesive materials: a review. Biomaterials. 1996;17(16):1553-61.
59. Packham DE the mechanical theory of adhesion-A seventy year perspective and its current status. In: Van Ooij WJ, Anderson JHR, editors. First international congress on adhesion science and technology the Netherlands: VSP BV; 1998. pp. 81-108.
60. Carvalho FC, Bruschi ML, Evangelista RC, Gremiao MPD. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2010;46(1):1-17.
61. LeeJW, Park JH, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J Pharm Sci. 2000;89(7):850-66.
62. Derjaguin B, Aleinikova I, Toporov YP. On the role of electrostatic forces in the adhesion of polymer particles to solid surfaces. Powder Technol. 1969;2(3):154-8.
63. Derjaguin B, ToporovYP, MullerV, Aleinikova I. On the relationship between the electrostatic and the molecular component of the adhesion of elastic particles to a solid surface. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1977;58(3):528-33.
64. Chickering DE 3rd, Mathiowitz E. Definitions, mechanisms, and theories of bioadhesion. In: Mathiowitz E, Chickering DEIII, Lehr C-M, editors. Bioadhesive drug delivery systems: fundamentals, novel approaches, and development. NewYork: Dekker; 1999. pp. 1-10.
65. Dodou D, Breedveld P, Wieringa PA. Mucoadhesives in the gastrointestinal tract: revisiting the literature for novel applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2005;60(1):1-16.
66. Ahagon A, Gent A. Effect of interfacial bonding on the strength of adhesion. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed. 1975;13(7):1285-300.
67. Vasir JK, Tambwekar K, Garg S. Bioadhesive microspheres as a controlled drug delivery system. Int J Pharm. 2003;255(1-2):13-32.
68. HuangY, LeobandungW, Foss A, Peppas NA. Molecular aspects of muco-And bioadhesion: tethered structures and site-specific surfaces. J Control Release. 2000;65(1-2):63-71.
69. Hägerstrom H, Edsman K, Stromme M. Low-frequency dielectric spectroscopy as a tool for studying the compatibility between pharmaceutical gels and mucous tissue. J Pharm Sci. 2003;92(9):1869-81.
70. Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart JD.A rheological assessment of the nature of interactions between mucoadhesive polymers and a homogenised mucus gel. Biomaterials. 1998;19(11-12):1083-92.
71. Hagesaether E, Sande SA. In vitro measurements of mucoadhesive properties of six types of pectin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2007;33(4):417-25.
72. Accili D, Menghi G, Bonacucina G, Martino PD, Palmieri GF. Mucoadhesion dependence of pharmaceutical polymers on mucosa characteristics. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;22(4):225-34.
73. Smart JD, Kellaway IW, Worthington HE. An in-vitro investigation of mucosa-Adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1984;36(5):295-9.
74. Chen J, Cyr GN. Compositions producing adhesion through hydration. In: Manly RS, editor. Adhesion in biological systems. NewYork: Academic;1970. pp. 163-81.
75. Nair AB, Kumria R, Harsha S, Attimarad M, Al-Dhubiab BE, Alhaider IA. In vitro techniques to evaluate buccal films. J Control Release. 2013;166(1):10-21.
76. Ch'ng HS, Park H, Kelly P, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery II: synthesis and evaluation of some swelling, water-insoluble bioadhesive polymers. J Pharm Sci. 1985;74(4):399-405.
77. Gandhi RB, Robinson JR. Oral cavity as a site for bioadhesive drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1994;13(1):43-74.
78. Abruzzo A, Bigucci F, Cerchiara T, Cruciani F, Vitali B, Luppi B. Mucoadhesive chitosan/ gelatin films for buccal delivery of propranolol hydrochloride. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87(1):581-8.
79. Gupta A, Garg S, Khar RK. Measurement of bioadhesion strength of mucoadhesive buccal tablet design of an in vitro assembly. Indian Drugs. 1992;30:152-5.
80. Pendekal MS, Tegginamat PK. Formulation and evaluation of a bioadhesive patch for buccal delivery of tizanidine. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2012;2(3):318-24.
81. Qi H, Chen W, Huang C, Li L, Chen C, Li W, Wu C. Development of a poloxamer analogs/carbopol-based in situ gelling and mucoadhesive ophthalmic delivery system for puerarin. Int J Pharm. 2007;337(1-2):178-87.
82. Choi H-G, Jung J-H, Ryu J-M, Yoon S-J, OhY-K, Kim C-K. Development of in situ-gelling and mucoadhesive acetaminophen liquid suppository. Int J Pharm. 1998;165(1):33-44.
83. HertzogBA, Mathiowitz E.Novel magnetic technique to measure bioadhesion. In: Mathiowitz E, Chickering DE III, Lehr C-M, editor. Bioadhesive drug delivery systems: fundamentals, novel approaches, and development. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1999. pp. 147-174.
84. Tobyn MJ, Johnson JR, Dettmar PW. Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucoadhesion. I: test conditions and instrumental parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1995;41(4):235-41.
85. Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Djokic J. Texture profile analysis of bioadhesive polymeric semisolids mechanical characterization and investigation of interactions between formulation components. J Appl Polym Sci. 1996;61(12):2229-34.
86. Jones DS, WoolfsonAD, Djokic J, CoulterWA. Development and mechanical characterization of bioadhesive semi-solid, polymeric systems containing tetracycline for the treatment of periodontal diseases. Pharm Res. 1996;13(11):1734-8.
87. Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF. Textural, viscoelastic and mucoadhesive properties of pharmaceutical gels composed of cellulose polymers. Int J Pharm. 1997;151(2):223-33.
88. Teng C, Ho N. Mechanistic studies in the simultaneous flow and adsorption of polymercoated latex particles on intestinal mucus I: methods and physical model development. J Control Release. 1987;6(1):133-49.
89. Rao K, Buri P. A novel in situ method to test polymers and coated microparticles for bioadhesion. Int J Pharm. 1989;52(3):265-70.
90. Grabovac V, Guggi D, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Comparison of the mucoadhesive properties of various polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1713-23.
91. Duchene D, Ponchel G. Principle and investigation of the bioadhesion mechanism of solid dosage forms. Biomaterials. 1992;13(10):709-14.
92. Kast CE, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Thiolated polymers-Thiomers: development and in vitro evaluation of chitosan-Thioglycolic acid conjugates. Biomaterials. 2001;22(17):2345-52.
93. Kast CE, Valenta C, Leopold M, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Design and in vitro evaluation of a novel bioadhesive vaginal drug delivery system for clotrimazole. J Control Release. 2002;81(3):347-54.
94. Nakamura F, Ohta R, MachidaY, Nagai T. In vitro and in vivo nasal mucoadhesion of some water-soluble polymers. Int J Pharm. 1996;134(1):173-81.
95. Bachhav YG, Patravale VB. Microemulsion based vaginal gel of fluconazole: formulation in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2009;365(1-2):175-9.
96. Setnikar I, Fantelli S. Liquefaction time of rectal suppositories. J Pharm Sci. 1962;51:566-71.
97. Alam MA, Ahmad FJ, Khan ZI, Khar RK, Ali M. Development and evaluation of acidbuffering bioadhesive vaginal tablet for mixed vaginal infections. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007;8(4):E109.
98. Ahmad FJ, Alam MA, Khan ZI, Khar RK, Ali M. Development and in vitro evaluation of an acid buffering bioadhesive vaginal gel for mixed vaginal infections. Acta Pharm. 2008;58(4):407-19.
99. Mahrag Tur K, Ch'ng H-S. Evaluation of possible mechanism(s) of bioadhesion. Int J Pharm. 1998;160(1):61-74.
100. Yu T, Malcolm K, Woolfson D, Jones DS, Andrews GP. Vaginal gel drug delivery systems: understanding rheological characteristics and performance. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(10):1309-22.
101. CrossMM.Rheology of non-Newtonian fluids: a newflowequation for pseudoplastic systems. J Colloid Sci. 1965;20(5):417-37.
102. Bird RB, Dai G, Yarusso BJ the rheology and flow of viscoplastic materials. Rev Chem Eng. 1983;1(1):1-70.
103. Banerjee R, Bellare JR, Puniyani R. Effect of phospholipid mixtures and surfactant formulations on rheology of polymeric gels, simulating mucus, at shear rates experienced in the tracheobronchial tree. Biochem Eng J. 2001;7(3):195-200.
104. Liu H-H, Li L, Birkholzer J. Unsaturated properties for non-Darcian water flow in clay. J Hydrol. 2012;430:173-8.
105. Barnes HA, Hutton JF, Walters K. An Introduction to Rheology. Amsterdam:Elsevier; 1989.
106. Deem DE. Rheology of dispersed systems. In: Lieberman HA, Rieger MM, Banker GS, editors. Pharmaceutical dosage forms: disperse systems. NewYork:Marcel Dekker; 1988.
107. GiboreauA, Cuvelier G, Launay B. Rheological behaviour of three biopolymer/water systems, with emphasis on yield stress and viscoelastic properties. J Texture Stud. 1994;25(2):119-38.
108. Jones DS, Bruschi ML, de Freitas O, Gremiao MP, Lara EH, Andrews GP. Rheological, mechanical and mucoadhesive properties of thermoresponsive, bioadhesive binary mixtures composed of poloxamer 407 and carbopol 974P designed as platforms for implantable drug delivery systems for use in the oral cavity. Int J Pharm. 2009;372(1-2):49-58.
109. Richardson JL, Whetstone J, Fisher AN, Watts P, Farraj NF, Hinchcliffe M, Benedetti L, Illum L. Gamma-scintigraphy as a novel method to study the distribution and retention of a bioadhesive vaginal delivery system in sheep. J Control Release. 1996;42(2):133-42.
110. Brown J, Hooper G, Kenyon CJ, Haines S, Burt J, Humphries JM, Newman SP, Davis SS, SparrowRA, Wilding IR. Spreading and retention of vaginal formulations in post-menopausal women as assessed by gamma scintigraphy. Pharm Res. 1997;14(8):1073-8.
111. Witter FR, Barditch-Crovo P, Rocco L, Trapnell CB. Duration of vaginal retention and potential duration of antiviral activity for five nonoxynol-9 containing intravaginal contraceptives. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999;65(2):165-70.
112. Vermani K, Garg S, Zaneveld LJ. Assemblies for in vitro measurement of bioadhesive strength and retention characteristics in simulated vaginal environment. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28(9):1133-46.
113. Chatterton BE, Penglis S, Kovacs JC, Presnell B, Hunt B. Retention and distribution of two 99mTc-DTPA labelled vaginal dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 2004;271(1-2):137-43.
114. Albrecht K, Greindl M, Kremser C, Wolf C, Debbage P, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Comparative in vivo mucoadhesion studies of thiomer formulations using magnetic resonance imaging and fluorescence detection. J Control Release. 2006;115(1):78-84.
115. Braga PC, Dal Sasso M, Spallino A, Sturla C, Culici M. Vaginal gel adsorption and retention by human vaginal cells. Visual analysis by means of inorganic and organic markers. Int J Pharm. 2009;373(1-2):10-5.
116. Poelvoorde N, Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Saerens B, De Backer E, dos Santos SGL, Vervaet C, Vaneechoutte M. De Boeck F, Van Bortel L, Temmerman M, Remon JP. In vivo evaluation of the vaginal distribution and retention of a multi-particulate pellet formulation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;73(2):280-4.
117. Mehta S, Verstraelen H, Peremans K, Villeirs G, Vermeire S, De Vos F, Mehuys E, Remon JP, Vervaet C. Vaginal distribution and retention of a multiparticulate drug delivery system, assessed by gamma scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Pharm. 2012;426 (1-2):44-53.
118. das Neves J, Bahia MF. Gels as vaginal drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 2006;318(1-2): 1-14.