Evaluation of possible mechanism(s) of bioadhesion

International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Volumn 160, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 61-74

  Tur, Khalid Mahrag ^a   Ch'ng, Hung Seng ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Adhesion test; Bioadhesion mechanism(s); Bioadhesive polymers; Swelling; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID; MUCIN; POLYACRYLIC ACID; POLYMER; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID;

ADHESION; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOLUTION; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; EVALUATION AND FOLLOW UP; IN VITRO STUDY; INTESTINE FLUID; MUCUS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STOMACH; STOMACH JUICE; SURFACE CHARGE; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 0032509831     PISSN: 03785173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5173(97)00297-4     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ch'ng, H.S., Park, H., Kelly, P., Robinson, J.R., 1985. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery II: Synthesis and evaluation of some swelling, water-insoluble bioadhesive polymers. J. Pharm. Sci. 74, 399-405.
2. Gandhi, R.B., Robinson, J.R., 1991. Permselective characteristics of rabbit buccal mucosa. Pharm. Res. 8, 1199-1202.
3. Garcia-Gonzalez, N., Kellaway, I.W., Blanco-Fuente, H., Anguiano-Igea, S., Delagado-Charro, B., Otero-Espinar, F.J., Blanco-Mendez, J., 1993. Design and evaluation of buccoadhesive metoclopramide hydrogels composed of poly(-acrylic acid) crosslinked with sucrose. Int. J. Pharm. 100, 65-70.
4. Hassan, E.E., Gallo, J.M., 1990. A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm. Res. 7, 491-495.
5. Hui, H.W., Robinson, J.R., 1985. Ocular delivery of progesterone using a bioadhesive polymer. Int. J. Pharm. 26, 203-213.
6. Kriwet, B., Kissel, T., 1996. Interactions between bioadhesive poly (acrylic acid) and calcium ions. Int. J. Pharm. 127, 135-145.
7. Lehr, C.M., Bouwstra, J.A., Bodde, H.E., Junginger, H.E., 1992. A surface energy analysis of mucoadhesion: contact angle measurements on polycarbophil and pig intestinal mucosa in physiologically relevant fluids. Pharm. Res. 9, 70-75.
8. Lehr, C.M., Bodde, H.E., Bouwstra, J.A., Junginger, H.E., 1993. A surface energy analysis of mucoadhesion II. Prediction of mucoadhesive performance by spreading coefficients. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1, 19-30.
9. Longer, M.A., Ch'ng, H.S., Robinson, J.R., 1985. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery III: oral delivery of chlorothiazide using a bioadhesive polymer. J. Pharm. Sci. 74, 406-411.
10. Longer, M.A., Robinson, J.R., 1986. Fundamental aspects of bioadhesion. Pharm. Int. 7, 114-117.
11. Park, K., 1989. A new approach to study mucoadhesion: colloidal gold staining. Int. J. Pharm. 53, 209-217.
12. Park, H., Robinson, J.R., 1985. Physico-chemical properties of water insoluble polymers important to mucin/epithelial adhesion. J. Control. Release 2, 47-57.
13. Park, H., Robinson, J.R., 1987. Mechanisms of mucoadhesion of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels. Pharm. Res. 4, 457-464.
14. Peppas, N.A., Buri, P.A., 1985. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues. J. Control. Release 2, 257-275.
15. Rillosi, M., Buckton, G., 1995. Modelling mucoadhesion by use of surface energy terms obtained by Lewis acid-Lewis base approach. Int. J. Pharm. 117, 75-84.