Cell mechanosensitivity to extremely low-magnitude signals is enabled by a LINCed nucleus

Stem Cells

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 2063-2076

  Uzer, Gunes ^a   Thompson, William R ^b   Sen, Buer ^a   Xie, Zhihui ^a   Yen, Sherwin S ^a   Miller, Sean ^a   Bas, Guniz ^a   Styner, Maya ^a   Rubin, Clinton T ^c   Judex, Stefan ^c   Burridge, Keith ^a   Rubin, Janet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Akt; FAK; Mesenchymal stem cells; Nesprin; Nucleus; RhoA; Strain; Vibration

Indexed keywords

FOCAL ADHESION KINASE;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ADIPOCYTE; ADIPOGENESIS; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CYTOSKELETON; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; FOCAL ADHESION; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS FIBER; WESTERN BLOTTING; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADIPOCYTES; ADIPOGENESIS; ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CELLS, CULTURED; CYTOSKELETON; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MICE, INBRED C57BL;

EID: 84929783313     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: 15494918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.2004     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Ozcivici E, Luu YK, Adler B, et al., Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010; 6: 50-59.
2. Thompson WR, Rubin CT, Rubin J,. Mechanical regulation of signaling pathways in bone. Gene 2012; 503: 179-193.
3. Sun Y, Chen CS, Fu J,. Forcing stem cells to behave: A biophysical perspective of the cellular microenvironment. Ann Rev Biophy 2012; 41: 519-542.
4. Styner M, Thompson WR, Galior K, et al., Bone marrow fat accumulation accelerated by high fat diet is suppressed by exercise. Bone 2014; 64: 39-46.
5. Shackelford LC, LeBlanc AD, Driscoll TB, et al., Resistance exercise as a countermeasure to disuse-induced bone loss. J Appl Physiol 2004; 97: 119-129.
6. Sordella R, Jiang W, Chen G-C, et al., Modulation of Rho GTPase signaling regulates a switch between adipogenesis and myogenesis. Cell 2003; 113: 147-158.
7. Sen B, Xie Z, Case N, et al., mTORC2 Regulates mechanically induced cytoskeletal reorganization and lineage selection in marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29: 78-89.
8. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL,. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005; 310: 1139-1143.
9. Hu SH, Chen JX, Butler JP, et al., Prestress mediates force propagation into the nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 329: 423-428.
10. Sen B, Guilluy C, Xie Z, et al., Mechanically induced focal adhesion assembly amplifies anti-adipogenic pathways in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2011; 29: 1829-1836.
11. Fettiplace R, Hackney CM,. The sensory and motor roles of auditory hair cells. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006; 7: 19-29.
12. Simoni A, Wolfgang W, Topping MP, et al., A mechanosensory pathway to the Drosophila circadian clock. Science 2014; 343: 525-528.
13. Rubin C, Turner AS, Bain S, et al., Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones. Nature 2001; 412: 603-604.
14. Gilsanz V, Wren TAL, Sanchez M, et al., Low-Level, High-frequency mechanical signals enhance musculoskeletal development of young women with low BMD. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 1464-1474.
15. Luu YK, Capilla E, Rosen CJ, et al., Mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation promotes osteogenesis while preventing dietary-induced obesity. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24: 50-61.
16. Uzer G, Pongkitwitoon S, Ete Chan M, et al., Vibration induced osteogenic commitment of mesenchymal stem cells is enhanced by cytoskeletal remodeling but not fluid shear. J Biomech 2013; 46: 2296-2302.
17. Sen B, Xie Z, Case N, et al., Mechanical signal influence on mesenchymal stem cell fate is enhanced by incorporation of refractory periods into the loading regimen. J Biomech 2011; 44: 593-599.
18. Chan ME, Uzer G, Rubin C,. The potential benefits and inherent risks of vibration as a non-drug therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2013; 11: 36-44.
19. Dickerson DA, Sander EA, Nauman EA,. Modeling the mechanical consequences of vibratory loading in the vertebral body: Microscale effects. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2008; 7: 191-202.
20. Garman R, Gaudette G, Donahue LR, et al., Low-level accelerations applied in the absence of weight bearing can enhance trabecular bone formation. J Orth Res 2007; 25: 732-740.
21. Thompson WR, Guilluy C, Xie Z, et al., Mechanically activated Fyn utilizes mTORC2 to regulate RhoA and adipogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2013; 31: 2528-2537.
22. Kearney E, Farrell E, Prendergast P, et al., Tensile strain as a regulator of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 1767-1779.
23. Bacabac RG, Smit TH, Van Loon JJWA, et al., Bone cell responses to high-frequency vibration stress: Does the nucleus oscillate within the cytoplasm? FASEB J 2006; 20: 858-864.
24. Coughlin TR, Niebur GL,. Fluid shear stress in trabecular bone marrow due to low-magnitude high-frequency vibration. J Biomech 2012; 45: 2222-2229.
25. Uzer G, Manske S, Chan M, et al., Separating fluid shear stress from acceleration during vibrations in vitro: Identification of mechanical signals modulating the cellular response. Cell Mol Bioeng 2012; 5: 266-276.
26. Uzer G, Pongkitwitoon S, Ian C, et al., Gap junctional communication in osteocytes is amplified by low intensity vibrations in vitro. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e90840.
27. Rosenberg N, Levy M, Francis M,. Experimental model for stimulation of cultured human osteoblast-like cells by high frequency vibration. Cytotechnology 2002; 39: 125-130.
28. Oxlund BS, Ortoft G, Andreassen TT, et al., Low-intensity, high-frequency vibration appears to prevent the decrease in strength of the femur and tibia associated with ovariectomy of adult rats. Bone 2003; 32: 69-77.
29. Tanaka SM, Li J, Duncan RL, et al., Effects of broad frequency vibration on cultured osteoblasts. J Biomech 2003; 36: 73-80.
30. Verschueren SMP, Roelants M, Delecluse C, et al., Effect of 6-month whole body vibration training on hip density, muscle strength, and postural control in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled pilot study. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 352-359.
31. Judex S, Zhong N, Squire ME, et al., Mechanical modulation of molecular signals which regulate anabolic and catabolic activity in bone tissue. J Cell Biochem 2005; 94: 982-994.
32. Takeuchi R, Saito T, Ishikawa H, et al., Effects of vibration and hyaluronic acid on activation of three-dimensional cultured chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54: 1897-1905.
33. Muir J, Judex S, Qin Y, et al., Safety of whole body vibration, considered for the prevention and/or treatment of osteoporosis, relative to standards set by the international safety organization. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: S294-S294.
34. Xie L, Jacobson JM, Choi ES, et al., Low-level mechanical vibrations can influence bone resorption and bone formation in the growing skeleton. Bone 2006; 39: 1059-1066.
35. Rubin CT, Capilla E, Luu YK, et al., Adipogenesis is inhibited by brief, daily exposure to high-frequency, extremely low-magnitude mechanical signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 17879-17884.
36. Prè D, Ceccarelli G, Benedetti L, et al., Effects of low-amplitude, high-frequency vibrations on proliferation and differentiation of SAOS-2 human osteogenic cell line. Tissue Eng C Meth 2009; 15: 669-679.
37. Hwang SJ, Lublinsky S, Seo YK, et al., Extremely small-magnitude accelerations enhance bone regeneration: A preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 1083-1091.
38. Sriram D, Jones A, Alatli-Burt I, et al., Effects of mechanical stimuli on adaptive remodeling of condylar cartilage. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 466-470.
39. Holguin N, Muir J, Rubin C, et al., Short applications of very low-magnitude vibrations attenuate expansion of the intervertebral disc during extended bed rest. Spine J 2009; 9: 470-477.
40. Leung KS, Shi HF, Cheung WH, et al., Low-magnitude high-frequency vibration accelerates callus formation, mineralization, and fracture healing in rats. J Orth Res 2009; 27: 458-465.
41. Wang CZ, Wang GJ, Ho ML, et al., Low-magnitude vertical vibration enhances myotube formation in C2C12 myoblasts. J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 840-848.
42. Holguin N, Judex S,. Rat intervertebral disc health during hindlimb unloading: Brief ambulation with or without vibration. Aviat Space Environ Med 2010; 81: 1078-1084.
43. Ozcivici E, Luu YK, Rubin CT, et al., Low-level vibrations retain bone marrow's osteogenic potential and augment recovery of trabecular bone during reambulation. PLoS One 2010; 5: e11178.
44. Lau E, Lee WD, Li J, et al., Effect of low-magnitude, high-frequency vibration on osteogenic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stromal cells. J Orth Res 2011; 29: 1075-1080.
45. Sandhu E, Miles JD, Dahners LE, et al., Whole body vibration increases area and stiffness of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon in the rat. J Biomech 2011; 44: 1189-1191.
46. Ito Y, Kimura T, Nam K, et al., Effects of vibration on differentiation of cultured PC12 Cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011; 108: 592-599.
47. Pre D, Ceccarelli G, Gastaldi G, et al., The differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) into osteoblasts is promoted by low amplitude, high frequency vibration treatment. Bone 2011; 49: 295-303.
48. Holguin N, Uzer G, Chiang FP, et al., Brief daily exposure to low-intensity vibration mitigates the degradation of the intervertebral disc in a frequency-specific manner. J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 1846-1853.
49. Tirkkonen L, Halonen H, Hyttinen J, et al., The effects of vibration loading on adipose stem cell number, viability and differentiation towards bone-forming cells. J R Soc Interface 2011; 8: 1736-1747.
50. Zhou Y, Guan X, Zhu Z, et al., Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on bone-derived scaffolds: Effect of microvibration and role of ERK1/2 activation. Eur Cell Mater 2011; 22: 12-25.
51. Isachenko V, Maettner R, Sterzik K, et al., In-vitro culture of human embryos with mechanical micro-vibration increases implantation rates. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 22: 536-544.
52. Kim IS, Song YM, Lee B, et al., Human mesenchymal stromal cells are mechanosensitive to vibration stimuli. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 1135-1140.
53. Fung EB, Gariepy CA, Sawyer AJ, et al., The effect of whole body vibration therapy on bone density in patients with thalassemia: A pilot study. Am J Hematol 2012; 87: E76-E79.
54. El-Shamy SM,. Effect of whole-body vibration on muscle strength and balance in diplegic cerebral palsy: A Randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2014; 93: 114-121 110.1097/PHM.1090b1013e3182a1541a1094.
55. Demiray L, Özçivici E,. Bone marrow stem cells adapt to low-magnitude vibrations by altering their cytoskeleton during quiescence and osteogenesis. Turkish J Biol 2015; 39: 88-97.
56. Burridge K, Wittchen ES,. The tension mounts: Stress fibers as force-generating mechanotransducers. J Cell Biol 2013; 200: 9-19.
57. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, et al., Cell Shape, Cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004; 6: 483-495.
58. Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE,. Mechanotransduction across the cell-surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 1993; 260: 1124-1127.
59. Francois M, Baldi J, Manning P, et al., 'Exercise snacks' before meals: A novel strategy to improve glycaemic control in individuals with insulin resistance. Diabetologia 2014: 1-9.
60. Martins RP, Finan JD, Farshid G, et al., Mechanical regulation of nuclear structure and function. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2012; 14: 431-455.
61. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, et al., Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006; 126: 677-689.
62. Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, et al., Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 2011; 474: 179-183.
63. Crisp M, Liu Q, Roux K, et al., Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex. J Cell Biol 2006; 172: 41-53.
64. Lombardi ML, Jaalouk DE, Shanahan CM, et al., The interaction between nesprins and sun proteins at the nuclear envelope is critical for force transmission between the nucleus and cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 26743-26753.
65. Zhang Q, Skepper JN, Yang F, et al., Nesprins: A novel family of spectrin-repeat-containing proteins that localize to the nuclear membrane in multiple tissues. J Cell Sci 2001; 114: 4485-4498.
66. Zhen Y-Y, Libotte T, Munck M, et al., NUANCE, a giant protein connecting the nucleus and actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 2002; 115: 3207-3222.
67. Stewart-Hutchinson PJ, Hale CM, Wirtz D, et al., Structural requirements for the assembly of LINC complexes and their function in cellular mechanical stiffness. Exp Cell Res 2008; 314: 1892-1905.
68. Lu W, Schneider M, Neumann S, et al., Nesprin interchain associations control nuclear size. Cell Mol Life Sci 2012; 69: 3493-3509.
69. Kanchanawong P, Shtengel G, Pasapera AM, et al., Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions. Nature 2010; 468: 580-584.
70. Fedorchak GR, Kaminski A, Lammerding J,. Cellular mechanosensing: Getting to the nucleus of it all. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2014; 115: 76-92.
71. Nagayama K, Yahiro Y, Matsumoto T,. Apical and basal stress fibers have different roles in mechanical regulation of the nucleus in smooth muscle cells cultured on a substrate. Cell Mol Bioeng 2013; 6: 473-481.
72. Chambliss AB, Khatau SB, Erdenberger N, et al., The LINC-anchored actin cap connects the extracellular milieu to the nucleus for ultrafast mechanotransduction. Sci Rep 2013; 3: 1087.
73. Poh Y-C, Shevtsov SP, Chowdhury F, et al., Dynamic force-induced direct dissociation of protein complexes in a nuclear body in living cells. Nat Commun 2012; 3: 866.
74. Swift J, Ivanovska IL, Buxboim A, et al., Nuclear Lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 2013; 341: 1240104.
75. Zwerger M, Jaalouk DE, Lombardi ML, et al., Myopathic lamin mutations impair nuclear stability in cells and tissue and disrupt nucleo-cytoskeletal coupling. Hum Mol Genet 2013; 22: 2335-2349.
76. Neumann S, Schneider M, Daugherty RL, et al., Nesprin-2 interacts with α-Catenin and regulates Wnt signaling at the nuclear envelope. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 34932-34938.
77. Rashmi RN, Eckes B, Glöckner G, et al., The nuclear envelope protein Nesprin-2 has roles in cell proliferation and differentiation during wound healing. Nucleus 2012; 3: 172-186.
78. Guilluy C, Osborne LD, Van Landeghem L, et al., Isolated nuclei adapt to force and reveal a mechanotransduction pathway in the nucleus. Nat Cell Biol 2014; 16: 376-381.
79. Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE,. Mechanotransduction at a distance: Mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 75-82.
80. Nagayama K, Yamazaki S, Yahiro Y, et al., Estimation of the mechanical connection between apical stress fibers and the nucleus in vascular smooth muscle cells cultured on a substrate. J Biomech 2014; 11: 1422-1429.
81. Wang X, Ha T,. Defining single molecular forces required to activate integrin and notch signaling. Science 2013; 340: 991-994.
82. Horn HF, Brownstein Z, Lenz DR, et al., The LINC complex is essential for hearing. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 740-750.
83. Peister A, Mellad JA, Larson BL, et al., Adult stem cells from bone marrow (MSCs) isolated from different strains of inbred mice vary in surface epitopes, rates of proliferation, and differentiation potential; 2004; 103: 1662-1668.
84. Case N, Xie Z, Sen B, et al., Mechanical activation of β-catenin regulates phenotype in adult murine marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Orth Res 2010; 28: 1531-1538.
85. Lammerding J, Schulze PC, Takahashi T, et al., Lamin A/C deficiency causes defective nuclear mechanics and mechanotransduction. J Clin Invest 2004; 113: 370-378.
86. Kuo J-C, Han X, Yates J, III, et al., Isolation of focal adhesion proteins for biochemical and proteomic analysis. In:, Shimaoka M, ed. Integrin and Cell Adhesion Molecules. Humana Press; Methods Mol Biol 2012; 757: 297-323.
87. Liu BP, Burridge K,. Vav2 Activates Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA downstream from growth factor receptors but Not β1 integrins. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20: 7160-7169.
88. Arthur WT, Burridge K,. RhoA Inactivation by p190RhoGAP regulates cell spreading and migration by promoting membrane protrusion and polarity. Mol Biol Cell 2001; 12: 2711-2720.
89. Razafsky DS, Ward CL, Kolb T, et al., Developmental regulation of linkers of the nucleoskeleton to the cytoskeleton during mouse postnatal retinogenesis. Nucleus 2013; 4: 399-409.
90. Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD,. Focal adhesion kinase: In command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6: 56-68.
91. Schober M, Raghavan S, Nikolova M, et al., Focal adhesion kinase modulates tension signaling to control actin and focal adhesion dynamics. J Cell Biol 2007; 176: 667-680.
92. Pan J, Wang T, Wang L, et al., Cyclic strain-induced cytoskeletal rearrangement of human periodontal ligament cells via the Rho signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e91580.
93. Greiner AM, Chen H, Spatz JP, et al., Cyclic Tensile strain controls cell shape and directs actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion alignment in spreading cells. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e77328.
94. Mott RE, Helmke BP,. Mapping the dynamics of shear stress-induced structural changes in endothelial cells. 2007; 293: C1616-C1626.
95. Noria S, Xu F, McCue S, et al., Assembly and reorientation of stress fibers drives morphological changes to endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. Am J Pathol 2004; 164: 1211-1223.
96. Berk JM, Tifft KE, Wilson KL,. The nuclear envelope LEM-domain protein emerin. Nucleus 2013; 4: 298-314.
97. Gurkan UA, Akkus O,. The mechanical environment of bone marrow: A review. Ann Biomed Eng 2008; 36: 1978-1991.
98. Klein-Nulend J, van der Plas A, Semeins CM, et al., Sensitivity of osteocytes to biomechanical stress in vitro. FASEB J 1995; 9: 441-445.
99. Donahue SW, Jacobs CR, Donahue HJ,. Flow-induced calcium oscillations in rat osteoblasts are age, loading frequency, and shear stress dependent. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2001; 281: C1635-C1641.
100. Sen B, Styner M, Xie Z, et al., Mechanical loading regulates NFATc1 and β-Catenin signaling through a GSK3β control node. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 34607-34617.
101. Judex S, Lei X, Han D, et al., Low-magnitude mechanical signals that stimulate bone formation in the ovariectomized rat are dependent on the applied frequency but not on the strain magnitude. J Biomech 2007; 40: 1333-1339.
102. Scaffidi P, Misteli T,. Lamin A-dependent nuclear defects in human aging. Science 2006; 312: 1059-1063.
103. Rubin C, Recker R, Cullen D, et al., Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss by a low-magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli: A clinical trial assessing compliance, efficacy, and safety. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 343-351.