Integration of perception, control and injury knowledge for safe human-robot interaction

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1196-1202

  Ragaglia, Matteo ^a   Bascetta, Luca ^a   Rocco, Paolo ^a   Zanchettin, Andrea Maria ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLERS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; SECURITY SYSTEMS;

EXTEROCEPTIVE SENSOR; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; ROBOT CONTROLLER; SAFE HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; SAFETY CONTROLLER; SAFETY EVALUATIONS; SOFTWARE COMPONENT; VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84929208198     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907005     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. ISO 10218-1:2012, Robot and Robotic Devices-Safety Requirements for industrial robots-Part 1: Robots. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
2. C. W. Gadd, "Use of weighted-impulse criterion for estimating injury hazard," in 10th Car Crash Conf., 1966.
3. J. Versace, "A review of the severity index," in 15th Stapp Car Crash Conf., 1971, p. 14.
4. S. Haddadin, A. Albu-Schäffer, M. Frommberger, J. Rossmann, and G. Hirzinger, "The "DLR crash report": Towards a standard crash-testing protocol for robot safety-part I and II," in IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2009, pp. 272-287.
5. K. Ikuta, H. Ishii, and M. Nokata, "General danger evaluation method for control strategy of human-care robot," J. Rob. Soc. Jpn., 2001.
6. -, "Safety evaluation method of design and control for Human-Care robots," Int. J. Rob. Res., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 281-297, 2003.
7. J. Heinzmann and A. Zelinsky, "Quantitative safety guarantees for physical human-robot interaction," Int. J. Rob. Res., vol. 22, no. 7-8, pp. 479-504, 2003.
8. D. Kulić and E. Croft, "Pre-collision safety strategies for human-robot interaction," Autonomous Robots, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 149-164, 2007.
9. D. Kulic and E. Croft, "Affective state estimation for human-robot interaction," IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 991-1000, 2007.
10. S. Haddadin, A. Albu-Schäffer, A. De Luca, and G. Hirzinger, "Collision detection and reaction: A contribution to safe physical humanrobot interaction," in IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Int. Rob. Sys., 2008, pp. 3356-3363.
11. S. Haddadin, M. Suppa, S. Fuchs, T. Bodenmüller, A. Albu-Schäffer, and G. Hirzinger, "Towards the robotic co-worker," in Robotics Research, ser. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Springer, 2011, vol. 70, pp. 261-282.
12. S. Haddadin, S. Haddadin, A. Khoury, T. Rokahr, S. Parusel, R. Burgkart, A. Bicchi, and A. Albu-Schäffer, "On making robots understand safety: Embedding injury knowledge into control," Int. J. Rob. Res., vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 1578-1602, 2012.
13. B. Lacevic and P. Rocco, "Kinetostatic danger field-A novel safety assessment for human-robot interaction," in IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Int. Rob. Sys., 2010, pp. 2169-2174.
14. T. Tsuji, H. Akamatsu, and M. Kaneko, "Non-contact impedance control for redundant manipulators using visual information," in IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Autom., vol. 3, 1997, pp. 2571-2576.
15. B. Lacevic, P. Rocco, and A. Zanchettin, "Safety assessment and control of robotic manipulators using danger field," IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1257-1270, 2013.
16. B. Matthias, S. Oberer-Treitz, H. Staab, E. Schuller, and S. Peldschus, "Injury risk quantification for industrial robots in collaborative operation with humans," in 41st Int. Symp. Rob., 2010.
17. J. Maeno, T. adn Hasewaga, "Development of a finite element model of the total human model for safety (thums) and application to car-pedestrian impacts," in 2001, 17th Int ESV Conf., 2001.
18. Z. Asgharpour, D. Baumgartner, R. Willinger, M. Graw, and S. Peld-schus, "The validation and application of a finite element human head model for frontal skull fracture analysis," J. Mech. Behav. Biomat., 2013, in press.
19. S. Oberer-Treitz, A. Puzik, and A. Verl, "Measuring the collision potential of industrial robots," in 41st Int. Symp. Rob., 2010.
20. O. Khatib, "Inertial properties in robotic manipulation: An object-level framework," Int. J. Rob. Res., vol. 13, pp. 19-36, 1995.
21. L. Bascetta, G. Ferretti, P. Rocco, H. Ardö, H. Bruyininckx, E. De-meester, and E. Di Lello, "Towards safe human-robot interaction in robotic cells: an approach based on visual tracking and intention estimation," in IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Int. Rob. Sys., 2011, pp. 2971-2978.
22. A. Blomdell, I. Dressler, K. Nilsson, and A. Robertsson, "Flexible application development and high-performance motion control based on external sensing and reconfiguration of ABB industrial robot controllers," in Proc. ICRA 2010 Workshop on Innovative Robot Control Architectures for Demanding (Research) Applications, 2010.
23. N. Ceriani, G. Buizza Avanzini, A. Zanchettin, L. Bascetta, and P. Rocco, "Optimal placement of spots in distributed proximity sensors for safe human-robot interaction," in IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Autom., 2013.