Kinetostatic danger field - A novel safety assessment for human-robot interaction

IEEE/RSJ 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2010 - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 2169-2174

  Lacevic, Bakir ^a   Rocco, Paolo ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSION; CLOSED FORM; ENVIRONMENT PERCEPTIONS; HUMAN -ROBOT INTERACTIONS; KINEMATIC REDUNDANCY; KINETOSTATIC; NOVEL METHODS; REAL-TIME APPLICATION; ROBOT MANIPULATOR; SAFETY ASSESSMENTS; SAFETY STRATEGY; SIMULATION RESULT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL IMPEDANCE;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; RISK PERCEPTION; ROBOT APPLICATIONS;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS;

EID: 78651481129     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649124     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. K. Ikuta, M.Nokata, H.Ishii, Safety Evaluation Method of Design and Control for Human-Care Robots, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2003, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp 281-297
2. G. Hirzinger, A. Albu-Schffer, M. Hhnle, I. Schaefer, N. Sporer, A new generation of torque controlled light-weight robots, Proc. Int. Conf. Robotics Automation, 2001, Seoul, Korea, pp 3356-3363.
3. M. Zinn, O. Khatib, B. Roth, J.K. Salisbury, Playing it safe (human-friendly robots), Robotics and Automation Magazine, June 2004, IEEE Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 12-21
4. J. Heinzmann and A. Zelinsky, Quantitative safety guarantees for physical human-robot interaction, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2003, vol. 22, no. 7/8, pp. 479-504
5. A. Bicchi, G. Tonietti, Fast and Soft Arm Tactics - Dealing with the Safety-Performance Trade-Off in Robot Arms Design and Control, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, Special issue on Dependability in Human-Friendly Robots, June 2004, Vol. 11, No. 2
6. D. Kulic, E. Croft, Safe Planning for Human-Robot Interaction, Journal of Robotic Systems 2005, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp 383-396
7. D. Kulic, E. Croft, Real-time safety for human-robot interaction, Robotics and Autonomous Systems,Jan 31, 2006, v54, n1, pp 1-12
8. D. Kulic, E. Croft, Affective State Estimation for Human-Robot Interaction, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 991-1000, 2007
9. O. Brock, O. Khatib, Elastic Strips: A Framework for Motion Generation in Human Environments International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 21, No. 12, Dec 2002, pp. 1031-1052
10. D. Henrich, S. Kuhn, Modeling Intuitive behavior for safe human/robot coexistence cooperation, Robotics and Automation, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on, vol., no., pp.3929-3934, 15-19 May 2006
11. J. Guiochet, D. Powell, E. Baudin, J.-P. Blanquart, Online safety monitoring using safety modes, 6th IARP/IEEE-RAS/EURON Workshop on Technical Challenges for Dependable Robots in Human Environments, Pasadena, CA, USA (May 2008)
12. S. Kuhn, T. Gecks, D. Henrich, Velocity Control for Safe Robot Guidance Based on Fused Vision and Force/torque Data, Proc. IEEE Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration, 3-6 September, 2006, Heidelberg, Germany
13. R. Alami, A. Albu-Schaeffer, A. Bicchi, R. Bischoff, R. Chatila, A. De Luca, A. De Santis, G. Giralt, J. Guiochet, G. Hirzinger, F. Ingrand, V. Lippiello, R. Mattone, D. Powell, S. Sen, B. Siciliano, G. Tonietti, and L. Villani, Safe and Dependable Physical Human-Robot Interaction in Anthropic Domains: State of the Art and Challenges, Proc. IROS'06 Workshop on pHRI - Physical Human-Robot Interaction in Anthropic Domains, 2006. IEEE
14. A. Pervez, J. Ryu, Safe physical human robot interaction-past, present and future Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3. (5 March 2008), pp. 469-483.
15. O. Khatib, O, Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots, International Journal of Robotics Research, 1986, 5(1), pp 9098.
16. M. Khatib, R. Chatila, An extended potential field approach for mobile robot sensor-based motions, Proc. of the Intelligent Autonomous Systems, IAS-4, IOS Press, pp. 490496, 1995.
17. R.B. Tilove, Local obstacle avoidance for mobile robots based on the method of artificial potentials, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp.566-571, 13-18 May 1990.
18. B.H. Krogh, A Generalized Potential Field Approach to Obstacle Avoidance Control, Proceedings of the International Robotics Research Conference, pp. 11501156, 1984.
19. P. Fiorini, Z. Shiller, Motion planning in dynamic environments using the relative velocity paradigm, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp.560-565, vol.1, 2-6 May 1993
20. Y. Nakabo, M. Ishikawa, Visual impedance using 1 ms visual feedback system, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 16-20 May 1998, vol.3, no., pp 2333-2338.
21. T. Tsuji, H. Akamatsu, M. Kaneko, Non-contact impedance control for redundant manipulators using visual information, Proc. 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation vol.3, pp.2571-2576, 20-25 Apr 1997.
22. O. Khatib, Inertial properties in robotics manipulation: An object-level framework, International Journal of Robotics Research, 1995 14(1), pp 1936.
23. P.I. Corke, A Robotics Toolbox for Matlab, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 1996, Vol. 3, No 1, pp 24-32.