Wanted – dead or alive: Realism in international law

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 146-172

  Steinberg, Richard H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928275806     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139107310.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (110)

1. Abbott, Kenneth W. (1993). “‘Trust But Verify’: The Production of Information in Arms Control Treaties and Other International Agreements, ” Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 1–58.
2. (1999). “International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 2 pp. 361—79.
3. Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal (2000). “Hard Law and Soft Law in International Governance, ” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 421–56.
4. Aquinas, Thomas (1947). Summa Theologica, translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province (New York: Benziger Brothers).
5. Austin, John (1832). The Province of Justice Determined (London: John Murray, Albemarle Street).
6. Bauer, Raymond, Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Lewis Anthony Dexter (1963). American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade (New York: Atherton Press).
7. Bederman, David J. (2002). The Spirit of International Law (Athens: University of Georgia Press).
8. Bradley, Curtis A., and G. Mitu Gulati (2010). “Withdrawing from International Custom, ” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 202–75.
9. Brunnée, Jutta, and Stephen Toope (2013). “Constructivism and International Law, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 119–45.
10. Brunsson, Nils (1989). The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
11. Bull, Hedley (1966). “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach, ” World Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 361–77.
12. Busch, Marc L., and Eric Reinhardt (2003). “Developing Countries and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement, ” Journal of World Trade, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 719–35.
13. Carr, E. H. (1946). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan).
14. Charlesworth, Hillary, Christine Chinkin, and Shelley Wright (1991). “Feminist Approaches to International Law, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 613–45.
15. Charnovitz, Steve (2002). “WTO Cosmopolitics, ” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 299–354.
16. Dahl, Robert A. (1957). “The Concept of Power, ” Behavioral Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 201–15.
17. Dickinson, Laura A. (2002). “Using Legal Process to Fight Terrorism: Detentions, Military Commissions, International Tribunals and the Rule of Law, ” Southern California Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 1407–92.
18. Downs, George W., David M. Rocke, and Petern N. Barsoom (1998). “Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism, ” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 397–420.
19. Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Mark A. Pollack (2013). “International Law and International Rela – tions:Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 3–32.
20. Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Joel P. Trachtman (1999). “Economic Analysis of International Law, ” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1–59.
21. Engle, Karen (2000). “Culture and Human Rights: The Asian Values Debate in Context, ” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 291–333.
22. Fearon, James D. (1998). “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation, ” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 269–305.
23. Fearon, James, and Alexander Wendt (2002). “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View, ” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations Theory (London: Sage Publications), pp. 52–72.
24. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink (1998). “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change, ” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 887–917.
25. Garrett, Geoffrey, and Barry R. Weingast (1993). “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community’s Internal Market, ” in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 173–206.
26. George, Alexander (1991). Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press).
27. Gilpin, Robert (1981). War and Change in International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
28. Goldsmith, Jack L., and Eric A. Posner (2005). The Limits of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press).
29. Goldstein, Judith L., and Robert O. Keohane (eds.) (1993). Ideas & Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
30. Goldstein, Judith L., Douglas Rivers, and Michael Tomz (2007). “Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade, ” International Organization, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 37–67.
31. Goldstein, Judith L., and Richard H. Steinberg (2008). “Negotiate or Litigate? The Effects of WTO Judicial Delegation on U. S. Trade Politics, ” Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 257–82.
32. Gourevitch, Peter (1978). “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics, ” International Organization, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 881–912.
33. Gowa, Joanne, and Soo Yeon Kim (2005). “An Exclusive Country Club: The Effects of the GATT on Trade, 1950–1994, ” World Politics, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 453–78.
34. Grieco, J. (1996). “State Interests and International Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union, ” Security Studies, Vol. 5, pp. 176–222
35. Grotius, Hugo (1901). The Rights of War and Peace, Including the Law of Nature and of Nations, translated by A. M. Campbell (New York: M. Walter Dunne).
36. Gruber, Lloyd (2000). Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
37. Guzman, Andrew T. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).
38. Haas, Peter M. (1992). “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone, ” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 187–224.
39. Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
40. Hartz, Louis (1955). The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World).
41. Hazard, J. N. (1950). “The Soviet Union and International Law, ” Soviet Studies, Vol. 1, pp. 189–99.
42. Hoffmann, Stanley (1971). “Weighing the Balance of Power, ” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 618–43.
43. Holmes, Oliver Wendell (1881). The Common Law (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.).
44. Hughes, E. J. (1974). “Winston Churchill and the Formation of the United Nations Organization, ” Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 9, No. 4, 177–94.
45. Ikenberry, G. John (2000). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
46. Kagan, Donald (1974). The Archidamian War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
47. Katzenstein, Peter J., Robert O. Keohane, and Stephen D. Krasner (1998). “International Organization and the Study of World Politics, ” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 645–85.
48. Kelson, Hans (1942). Law and Peace in International Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
49. Kennedy, David (1988). “International Law and the Nineteenth Century: History of an Illusion, ” Quinnipiac Law Review, Vol. 19, pp. 99–136.
50. Keohane, Robert O. (1983). “The Demand for International Regimes, ” in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 325–55.
51. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
52. (forthcoming). “Stephen Krasner: Subversive Realist” in Martha Finnemore and Judith Goldstein (eds.), Power in the Contemporary Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
53. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph Nye (1972). “Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction, ” International Organization, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 329–49.
54. Kindleberger, Charles P. (1969). American Business Abroad (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
55. Kingsbury, Benedict, Nico Krisch, and Richard B. Stewart (2005). “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, ” Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 15–61.
56. Kissinger, Henry (1973). A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822 (New York: Houghton Mifflin).
57. Koh, Harold H. (2004). “International Law as Part of Our Law, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 43–57.
58. Koremenos, Barbara (2013). “Institutionalism and International Law, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 59–82.
59. Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal (2001). “The Rational Design of International Institutions, ” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 761–99.
60. Krasner, Stephen D. (1976). “State Power and the Structure of International Trade, ” World Politics, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 317–47.
61. (1978). Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials, Investments, and U. S. Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
62. (1983a). “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables, ” in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 1–21.
63. (1983b). “Regimes and the Limits of Realism: Regimes as Autonomous Variables, ”in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 355–68.
64. (1991). “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier, ”World Politics, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 336–66.
65. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
66. Kratochwil, Friedrich (1989). Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
67. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
68. Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 91–196.
69. Lauterpacht, Hersch (1946). “The Grotian Tradition in International Law, ” The British Year Book of International Law, Vol. 23, pp. 1–53.
70. Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravcsik (1999). “Is Anybody Still a Realist?, ” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 5–55.
71. Lissitzyn, O. J. (1952). “Recent Soviet Literature on International Law, ” The American Slavic and East European Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 257–73.
72. Machiavelli, Niccolò (1908). The Prince, translated by W. K. Marriott (London: J. M. Dent).
73. Mearsheimer, John J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton).
74. Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez (1997). “World Society and the Nation State, ” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 14481.
75. Moravcsik, Andrew (1997). “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics, ” International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 513–53.
76. (2013). “Liberal Theories of International Law, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 83–118.
77. Morgenthau, Hans J. (1940). “Positivism, Functionalism and International Law, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 260–84.
78. (1978). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th ed. (New York: Alfred Knopf).
79. Morrow, James D. (1994). “Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution Versus Information, ” International Organization, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 387–423.
80. Pauwelyn, Joost, and Manfred Elsig (2013). “The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 445–73.
81. Platias, Athanasios, and Constantinos Koliopoulos (2010). Thucydides on Strategy: Grand Strategies in the Peloponnesian War and Their Relevance Today (New York: Columbia University Press).
82. Pollack, Mark A. (forthcoming). “Theorizing the European Union: Realist, Intergovernmen – talist and Institutionalist Approaches, ” in Erik Jones, Anand Menon, and Stephen Weath – erill (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (New York: Oxford University Press).
83. Popper, Karl (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York: Basic Books).
84. Pound, Roscoe (1921). The Spirit of the Common Law (Francestown, NH: Marshall Jones Company).
85. Putnam, Robert (1988). “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, ” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 427–61.
86. Raustiala, Kal (2013). “Institutional Proliferation and the International Legal Order, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 293–320.
87. Raustiala, Kal, and David Victor (1998). “Conclusions, ” in Kal Raustiala, David G. Victor, and Eugene V. Skolkinoff (eds.), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 659707.
88. Riches, Cromwell A. (1940). Majority Rule in International Organization (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).
89. Rose, Gideon (1998). “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, ” World Politics, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 144–72.
90. Said, Edward W. (1978). Orientalism (New York: Pantheon).
91. Sattler, Thomas, and Thomas Bernauer (2011). “Gravitation or Discrimination? Determinants of Litigation in the World Trade Organization, ” European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 143–67.
92. Shaffer, Gregory C. and Mark A. Pollack (2013). “Hard Law and Soft Law, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 197–222.
93. Sil, Rudra, and Peter J. Katzenstein (2010). Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
94. Simma, Bruno, and Andreas L. Paulus (1999). “The Responsibility of Individuals for Himan Rights Abuses in Internal Conflicts: A Positivist View, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 302–16.
95. Simmons, Beth (2011). “The Global Diffusion of Law: Transnational Crime and the Case of Human Trafficking, ” in American Political Science Association (APSA), 2011 Annual Meeting (Washington, DC: APSA), available at SSRN: http://ssrn. com/abstract=1910623.
96. Slaughter Burley, Ann-Marie (1993). “International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 205–39.
97. (2004). A New World Order: Government Networks and the Disaggregated State(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
98. Stein, Arthur (1983). “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World, ” in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 115–40.
99. Steinberg, Richard H. (2002). “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO, ” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 339–74.
100. (2004a). “Who Is Sovereign?, ” Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 329–45.
101. (2004b). “Judicial Law-Making at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 613–45.
102. (forthcoming). “International Trade Law as a Mechanism for State Transformation, ”in Martha Finnemore and Judith Goldstein (eds.), Power in the Contemporary Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
103. Sunstein, Cass S. (1996). Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press).
104. Thucydides (1954). History of the Peloponnesian War, translated by Rex Warner (New York: Penguin Classics).
105. Vernon, Raymond (1971). Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U. S. Enterprises (New York: Basic Books).
106. Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill). Weber, Max (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, translated by A. M.
107. Henderson and Talcott Parsons (New York: Oxford University Press).
108. Wendt, Alexander (1992). “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics, ” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 391–425.
109. Wohlforth, William C. (2008). “Realism, ” in Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 131–49.
110. Zamora, Stephen (1980). “Voting in International Economic Organizations, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 566–78.