The politics of treaty interpretation: Variations and explanations across international tribunals

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 445-474

  Pauwelyn, Joost ^a   Elsig, Manfred ^b  

^a Institute of International and Development Studies   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928291051     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139107310.022     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Duncan Snidal (2000). “The Concept of Legalization, ” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 401–19.
2. Abi-Saab, Georges (2010). “The Appellate Body and Treaty Interpretation, ” in Malgosia Fitz – maurice, Olufemi Elias, and Panos Merkouris (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff), pp. 99–109.
3. Allott, Philip (1999). “The Concept of International Law, ” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 31–50.
4. Alter, Karen J. (2008a). “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context, ” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 33–63.
5. (2008b). “Delegating to International Courts: Self-Binding vs. Other-Binding Delegation, ” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 37–76.
6. Alter, Karen J., and Laurence R. Helfer (2010). “Nature or Nurture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice, ” International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 563–92.
7. Arnull, Anthony (2006). The European Union and Its Court of Justice, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
8. Bankowski, Zeno, Neil MacCormick, Robert S. Summers, and Jerzy Wroblewski (1991). “On Method and Methodology, ” in D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth Press), pp. 9–28.
9. Bianchi, Andrea (2010). “Textual Interpretation and (International) Law Reading: The Myth of (In)determinacy and the Genealogy of Meaning, ” in Pieter H. F. Bekker, Rudolf Dolzer, and Michael Waibel (eds.), Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy: Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 34–55.
10. Busch, Marc L. (2007). “Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade, ” International Organization, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 735–61.
11. Caron, David D. (2006). “Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals, ” Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 401–22.
12. Crema, Luigi (2010). “Disappearance and New Sightings of Restrictive Interpretation(s), ” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 681–700.
13. David, Felix (2009). “The Role of Precedent in the WTO-New Horizons?, ” Working Paper No. 2009–12 (Maastricht: Maastricht University Faculty of Law, Institute for Globalisation and International Regulation).
14. Davis, Christina L. (2011). “WTO Adjudication as a Tool for Conflict Management, ” Paper presented at the 4th Annual Conference on the Political Economy of International Organizations, Zurich.
15. DiMascio, Nicholas, and Joost Pauwelyn (2008). “Non-discrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 102, No. 1, pp. 48–89.
16. Drezner, Daniel (2006). “The Viscosity of Global Governance: When Is Forum-Shopping Expensive?, ” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
17. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter (2002). “Six Years on the Bench of the ‘World Trade Court’: Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, ” Journal of World Trade, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 605–39.
18. Elsig, Manfred, and Mark A. Pollack (forthcoming). “Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: Nomination and Appointment of Judicial Candidates in the WTO Appellate Body, ” European Journal of International Relations.
19. Fachiri, Alexander P. (1929). “Interpretation of Treaties, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 745–52.
20. Fauchald, Ole Kristian (2008). “The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – an Empirical Analysis, ” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 301–64.
21. Ferejohn, John (2002). “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law, ” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 41–68.
22. Gardiner, Richard (2008). Treaty Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
23. Gibson, James L. (2006). “Judicial Institutions, ” in R. A. W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder, and Bert A. Rockman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 514–34.
24. Ginsburg, Tom (2005). “International Judicial Lawmaking, ” in Stefan Voigt, Max Albert, and Dieter Schmidtchen (eds.), International Conflict Resolution (Ochsenfurt-Hohestadt: Mohr Siebeck), pp. 155–82.
25. Gordon, Edward (1965). “The World Court and the Interpretation of Constitutive Treaties: Some Observations on the Development of an International Constitutional Law, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 794–833.
26. Grant, Ruth W., and Robert O. Keohane (2005). “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics, ” American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 29–43.
27. Grover, Leena (2010). “A Call to Arms: Fundamental Dilemmas Confronting the Interpretation of Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, ” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 543–83.
28. Helfer, Laurence R. (2002). “Overlegalizing Human Rights: International Relations Theory and the Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash against Human Rights Regimes, ” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 102, No. 7, pp. 1832–911.
29. Helfer, Laurence R., and Anne-Marie Slaughter (2005). “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo, ” California Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 899–956.
30. Hirsch, Moshe (2009). “Investment Tribunals and Human Rights: Divergent Paths, ” in Pierre – Marie Dupuy, Francesco Francioni, and Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 97–114.
31. Howse, Robert (2000). “Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of the WTO, ” in J. H. H. Weiler (ed.), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 35–70.
32. Jacob, Marc (2011). “Precedents: Lawmaking through International Adjudication, ” German Law Journal, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 1005–32.
33. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink (1998). Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
34. Klabbers, Jan (2010). “Virtuous Interpretation, ” in Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Olufemi Elias, and Panos Merkouris (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff), pp. 17–37.
35. Koremenos, Barbara (2007). “If Only Half of International Agreements Have Dispute Resolution Provisions, Which Half Needs Explaining, ”? Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 189–212.
36. Koremenos, Barbara, and Timm Betz (2013). “The Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Agreements, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 371–93.
37. Kuijper, Pieter Jan (1994). “The Law of GATT as a Special Field of International Law: Ignorance, Further Refinement or Self-Contained System of International Law?, ” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 227–57.
38. Kuijper, Pieter Jan, and Marco Bronckers (2005). “WTO Law in the European Court of Justice, ” Common Market Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 1313–55.
39. Laird, Ian (2009). “Interpretation in International Investment Arbitration – Through the Looking Glass, ” in Jacques Werner and Arif Hyder Ali (eds.), A Liber Amicorum: Thomas Wälde — Law beyond Conventional Thought (London: Cameron May), pp. 151–64.
40. Lasser, Mitchel de S. O. L’E. (2004). Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
41. Lauterpacht, Hersch (1949). “Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties, ” British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 26, pp. 48–85.
42. (1950). “De l’Interprétation des Traités: Rapport, ” Annuaire de l’Institut du Droit International, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 366–460.
43. Lenaerts, Koen (2007). “Interpretation and the Court of Justice: A Basis for Comparative Reflection, ” The International Lawyer, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 1011–32.
44. Letsas, George (2010). “Strasbourg’s Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer, ” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 509–41.
45. Levy, Philip I. (2011). “Doha Round: Keep Moving Forward or Fall Down, ” in Richard Baldwin and Simon Evenett (eds.), Why World Leaders Must Resist the False Promise of Another Doha Delay (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research), pp. 47–52.
46. Lixinski, Lucas (2010). “Treaty Interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Expansionism at the Service of the Unity of International Law, ” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 585–604.
47. Mattli, Walter, and Anne-Marie Slaughter (1998). “Revisiting the European Court of Justice, ” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 177–209.
48. McDougal, Myres S. (1967). “The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles upon Interpretation: Textuality Redivivus, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 992–1000.
49. McDougal, Myres S., Harold D. Lasswell, and James C. Miller (1967). The Interpretation of International Agreements and World Public Order: Principles of Content and Procedure (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
50. McGinnis, John O., and Mark L. Movsesian (2000). “The World Trade Constitution, ” Harvard Law Review, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp. 511–605.
51. Milanovic, Marko (2009). “The ICJ and Evolutionary Treaty Interpretation, ” Blog of the European Journal of International Law: EJIL: Talk!, 14 July, available at http://www. ejiltalk.org/the-icj-and-evolutionary-treaty-interpretation/
52. Nielson, Daniel L., and Michael J. Tierney (2003). “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform, ” International Organization, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 241–76.
53. Okowa, Phoebe (2010). “Interpreting Constitutive Instruments of International Criminal Tribunals: Reflections on the Special Court for Sierra Leone, ” in Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Olufemi Elias, and Panos Merkouris (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff), pp. 333–55.
54. Orakhelashvili, Alexander (2008). The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
55. Pauwelyn, Joost (2003). Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
56. Payne, Cymie R. (2010). “Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay: The International Court of Justice Recognizes Environmental Impact Assessment as a Duty under International Law, ” American Society of International Law Insight, Vol. 14, No. 9, available at http://www. asil.org/insights100422.cfm.
57. Posner, Eric A., and John C. Yoo (2005). “Judicial Independence in International Tribunals, ” California Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 1–74.
58. Rasmussen, Hjalte (1986). On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff).
59. Roberts, Anthea (2010). “Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 179–225.
60. Romani, Carlos Fernandez De Casadevante (2007). Sovereignty and Interpretation of International Norms (Heidelberg: Springer).
61. Romano, Cesare P. R. (2007). “The Shift from the Consensual to the Compulsory Paradigm in International Adjudication: Elements for a Theory of Consent, ” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 791–872.
62. Rosenne, Shabtai (2006). The Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920—2005: Procedure, Vol. III, 4th ed. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff).
63. Schabas, William A. (2003). “Interpreting the Statutes of the Ad Hoc Tribunals, ” in Lal Chand Vohrah et al. (eds.), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (The Hague: Kluwer Law International), pp. 847–88.
64. Schill, Stephan W. (2010). “Glamis Gold, Ltd. v. United States, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 253–59.
65. Schreuer, Christoph (2010). “Diversity and Harmonization of Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration, ” in Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Olufemi Elias, and Panos Merkouris (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff), pp. 129–51.
66. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth (1993). The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (New York: Cambridge University Press).
67. Shapiro, Martin (2002). “The Success of Judicial Review and Democracy, ” in Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet (eds.), On Law, Politics, and Judicialization (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 149–83.
68. Steinberg, Richard H. (2004). “Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 247–75.
69. Swart, Mia (2010). “Is There a Text in This Court? The Purposive Method of Interpretation and the Ad Hoc Tribunals, ” Zeitschrift fur Ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 767–87.
70. Torres-Bernárdez, Santiago (1998). “Interpretation of Treaties by the International Court of Justice following the Adoption of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, ” in Gerhard Hafner et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum: Professor Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern: In Honour of His 80th Birthday (The Hague: Kluwer Law International), pp. 721–48.
71. Van Damme, Isabelle (2009). Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
72. Voeten, Erik (2007). “The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights, ” International Organization, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 669–701.
73. (2008). “The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights, ” American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 417–33.
74. (2013). “International Judicial Independence, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 421—44.
75. Weiler, J. H. H. (2001). “The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement, ” Journal of World Trade, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 191–207.
76. (2008). “Prolegomena to a Meso-theory of Treaty Interpretation at the Turn of the Century, ” draft available at www.iilj.org/courses/documents/2008Colloquium.Session5.Weiler.pdf.
77. (2010). “The Interpretation of Treaties – a Re-examination, Preface, ” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 3, p. 507.