Developing countries and general agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization dispute settlement

Journal of World Trade

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 719-735

  Busch, Marc L ^a   Reinhardt, Eric ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40949156185     PISSN: 10116702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/trad2003034     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baker, Scott, and Claudio Mezzetti (2001), Prosecutorial Resources, Plea Bargaining, and the Decision to Go to Trial, 17 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1, 149-167.
2. Busch, Marc L. (2000), Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes Under GATT, 44 Journal of Conflict Resolution, 425-446.
3. Busch, Marc L. and Eric Reinhardt (2000), Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes, 24 Fordham International Law Journal 1/2, 158-172.
4. Busch, Marc L. and Eric Reinhardt (2002), "Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement", in Daniel M. Kennedy and James D. Southwick (eds), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert Hudec (New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
5. Busch, Marc L. and Eric Reinhardt (forthcoming), "Transatlantic Trade Conflicts and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement", in Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann and Mark Pollack (eds), Dispute Prevention and Dispute Settlement in the Transatlantic Partnership (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
6. Fournier, Gary M. and Thomas W. Zuelhke (1989), Litigation and Settlement: An Empirical Approach, 71 Review of Economics and Statistics 2, 189-195.
7. Gabilondo, Jose Juis Perez (2001), Developing Countries in the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures, 35 Journal of World Trade 4 (August), 483-488.
8. Hoekman, Bernard M. and Michel M. Kostecki (2001), The Political Economy of the World Trading System, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
9. Horn, Henrik, Håkan Nordström and Petros C. Mavroidis (1999), Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?, CEPR Discussion Paper 2340 (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research).
10. Horn, Henrik and Petros C. Mavroidis (2001), Economic and Legal Aspects of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause, 17 European Journal of Political Economy 2, 233-279.
11. Howse, Robert (2000), "Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence", in J.H.H. Weiler (ed.), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
12. Hudec, Robert E. (1978), "Adjudication of International Trade Disputes", Thames Essay No. 16 (London: Trade Policy Research Centre).
13. Hudec, Robert E. (1980), GATT Dispute Settlement After the Tokyo Round: An Unfinished Business, 13 Cornell International Law Journal 2, 145-203.
14. Hudec, Robert E. (1987), Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System (Brookfield, VT: Gower).
15. Hudec, Robert E. (1993), Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System (Salem, NH: Butterworth Legal Publishers).
16. Hudec, Robert E. (1999), The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years, 8 Minnesota Journal of Global Trade (Winter), 1-53.
17. Hudec, Robert E. (2002), "The Adequacy of WTO Dispute Settlement Remedies", in Bernard Hoekman et al. (eds), Development, Trade, and the WTO (Washington, D.C.: World Bank).
18. Kuruvila, Pretty Elizabeth (1997), Developing Countries and the GATT/ WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism, 31 J.W.T. 6 (December), 171-208.
19. Lacarte-Muro, Julio and Petina Gappah (2000), Developing Countries and the WTO Legal and Dispute Settlement System: A View from the Bench, 3 Journal of International Economic Law 3, 395-401.
20. Mavroidis, Petros C. (2000), Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place, 11 European Journal of International Law 4, 763-813.
21. Meurer, Michael J. (1989), The Settlement of Patent Litigation, 20 RAND Journal of Economics 1, 77-91.
22. Nalebuff, Barry (1987), Credible Pretrial Negotiation, 18 RAND Journal of Economics 2, 198-210.
23. Palmeter, David and Petros C. Mavroidis (1998), The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law, 92 American Journal of International Law, 398-413.
24. Pauwelyn, Joost (2000), Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules - Toward a More Collective Approach, 94 American Journal of International Law 2, 335-347.
25. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1997), International Trade Law and the GATT/ WTO Dispute Settlement System (London: Kluwer).
26. Reinhardt, Eric (2001), Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes, 45 Journal of Conflict Resolution 2, 174-195.
27. Reinhardt, Eric (2002), "Tying Hands Without a Rope: Rational Domestic Response to International Institutional Constraints", in Daniel Drezner (ed.), Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
28. Reinhardt, Eric (forthcoming), Legislative Politics and GATT Trade Disputes, 1948-1994 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
29. Shoyer, Andrew W. (1998), The First Three Years of WTO Dispute Settlement: Observations and Suggestions, 1 Journal of International Economic Law, 277-302.
30. Steger, Debra P. and Susan M. Hainsworth (1998), World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement: The First Three Years, 1 Journal of International Economic Law, 199-226.
31. TN/DS/W/1. Contribution of the European Communities and its Member States to the Improvement of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding. Submitted by the EC, 13 March 2002.
32. Valles, Cherise M. and Brendan P. McGivern (2000), The Right to Retaliate Under the WTO Agreement: The "Sequencing" Problem, 34 J.W.T. 2 (April), 63-84.
33. WT/DSB/25. Article 5 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding. Communication from the Director-General. Submitted by the Director-General 13 July 2001.
34. WT/MIN(99)/8. Proposed Amendment of the Dispute Settlement Understanding. Communication from Canada, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Ecuador, the European Communities and its Member States, Hungary, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Slovenia, Switzerland, Thailand and Venezuela. Submitted by Japan on 16 November 1999.