Institutional proliferation and the international legal order

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 293-320

  Raustiala, Kal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928298165     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139107310.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Aggarwal, Vinod K. (1985). Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Textile Trade (Berkeley: University of California Press).
2. (1998) (ed.). Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages, & Nesting (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
3. Alter, Karen J. (2013). “The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 345–70.
4. Alter, Karen J., and Sophie Meunier (2009). “The Politics of International Regime Complexity, ” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 13–24.
5. Baier, Scott L., Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, and Peter Egger (2007). “The New Regionalism: Causes and Consequences, ” économie Internationale, Vol. 1, No. 109, pp. 9–29.
6. Baxter, R. R. (1958). “Jurisdiction over Visiting Forces and the Development of International Law, ” Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 174–80.
7. Benvenisti, Eyal, and George W. Downs (2009). “Toward Global Checks and Balances, ” Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 20, No. 3–4, pp. 366–87.
8. Biermann, Frank, Philipp Pattberg, Harro van Asselt, and Fariborz Zelli (2009). “The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis, ” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 14–40.
9. Busch, Marc L. (2007). “Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade, ” International Organization, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 73561.
10. Busch, Marc L., Eric Reinhardt, and Gregory C. Shaffer (2009). “Does Legal Capacity Matter? A Survey of WTO Members, ” World Trade Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 55977.
11. Charney, Jonathan I. (1998). “Is International Law Threatened by Multiple International Tribunals?, ” Recueil des Cours, Vol. 271, pp. 101–382.
12. Charney, Jonathan I., Richard B. Bilder, Bernard H. Oxman, and Patricia M. Wald (2002). “The ‘Horizontal’ Growth of International Courts and Tribunals: Challenges or Opportunities?, “ Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting, Vol. 96, pp. 369–80.
13. Charnovitz, Steve (2002). “A World Environment Organization, ” Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 323–62.
14. Claude, Inis L., Jr. (1988). Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization, 4th ed. (New York: Random House).
15. Cogan, Jacob Katz (2008). “Competition and Control in International Adjudication, ” Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 411–49.
16. Davis, Christina L. (2009). “Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy, ” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 25–31.
17. Dorf, Michael C., and Charles F. Sabel (1998). “A Constitution of Democratic Experimen – talism, ” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 267–473.
18. Drezner, Daniel W. (2009). “The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity, ” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 65–70.
19. Dunoff, Jeffrey L. (2007). “The Many Dimensions of Softwood Lumber, ” Alberta Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 319–56.
20. Fitzmaurice, Sir Gerald (1986). The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, Vols. 1–2 (Cambridge: Grotius).
21. Gantz, David A. (1999). “Dispute Settlement under the NAFTA and the WTO: Choice of Forum Opportunities and Risks for the NAFTA Parties, ” American University International Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 1025–106.
22. Gehring, Thomas, and Sebastian Oberthur (2009). “The Casual Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions, ” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 125–56.
23. Goldstein, Joshua S. (2011). Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide (New York: Dutton).
24. Gourgourinis, Anastasios (2011). “General/Particular International Law and Primary/Secondary Rules: Unitary Terminology of a Fragmented System, ” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 993–1026.
25. Guillaume, Gilbert (2000). “The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Outlook for the International Legal Order, ” Speech by His Excellency Judge Gilbert Guillaume, President of the International Court of Justice (New York: Sixth Committee of the General Assembly United Nations).
26. Hachigian, Nina, and Mona Sutphen (2008). The Next American Century: How the U. S. Can Thrive as Other Powers Rise (New York: Simon & Schuster).
27. Hafner, G. (2000). Risks Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law, United Nations International Law Commission, Report on the Work of Its Fifty-Second Session, Fifty – Fifth-session, Supplement No.10.
28. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., David G. Victor, and Yonatan Lupu (2012). “Political Science Research on International Law: The State of the Field, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 47–97.
29. Helfer, Laurence R. (2004). “Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, ” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1–83.
30. (2009). “Regime Shifting in the International Intellectual Property System, ” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 39–44.
31. Hudec, Robert E. (1987). “‘Transcending the Ostensible’: Some Reflections on the Nature of Litigation between Governments, ” Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 211–26.
32. Ikenberry, G. John (2000). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
33. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
34. International Law Commission (2006). Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law, Report (New York: United Nations).
35. Jenks, C. Wilfred (1953). The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 30, pp. 401–53.
36. Kennedy, David (1987). “The Move to Institutions, ” Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 841–988.
37. Keohane, Robert O. (1982). “The Demand for International Regimes, ” International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 325–55.
38. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
39. (1997). “International Relations and International Law: Two Optics, ” Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 487–502.
40. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye, Jr. (2001). “The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy, ” in Roger B. Porter et al. (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Washington, DC: Brookings Center for Business and Government), pp. 264–307.
41. Keohane, Robert O., and David G. Victor (2011). “The Regime Complex for Climate Change, ” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 7–23.
42. Koskenniemi, Martti, and Päivi Leino (2002). “Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties, ” Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 553— 79.
43. Krasner, Stephen D. (1983) (ed.). International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
44. Lake, David A. (2009). Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
45. Leebron, David W. (2002). “Linkages, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 5–27.
46. Palmer, Geoffrey (1992). “New Ways to Make International Environmental Law, ” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 259–83.
47. Patrick, Stewart. (2009). The Best Laid Plans: The Origins of American Multilateralism and the Dawn of the Cold War (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
48. Pauwelyn, Joost, and Luiz Eduardo Salles (2009). “Forum Shopping before International Tribunals: (Real) Concerns, (Im)possible Solutions, ” Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 77–118.
49. Pevehouse, Jon (2010). “Global Governance Snapshot, ” Current History, Vol. 109, No. 730, inside cover.
50. Rabkin, J. A. (2004). The Case for Sovereignty: Why the World Should Welcome American Independence, 2nd ed. (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research).
51. Raustiala, Kal, and David G. Victor (2004). “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources, ” International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 277–309.
52. Romano, Cesare P. R. (1999). “The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle, ” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 709–51.
53. Ruggie, John Gerard (1993). “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations, ” International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 139–74.
54. Shanks, Cheryl, Harold K. Jacobson, and Jeffrey H. Kaplan (1996). “Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992, ” International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 593–627.
55. Shany, Yuval (2004). The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
56. Steinberg, Richard H. (2013). “Wanted-Dead or Alive: Realist Approaches to International Law, ” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 146–72.
57. Stokke, Olav Schram (2004). “Trade Measures and Climate Compliance: Institutional Interplay between WTO and the Marrakesh Accords, ” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 339–57.
58. Szasz, Paul C. (1966). “How to Develop World Peace through Law, ” American Bar Association Journal, Vol. 52, September, pp. 851–57.
59. Teitel, Ruti G. (2011). Humanity’s Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
60. Teitel, Ruti, and Robert Howse (2009). “Cross-Judging: Tribunalization in a Fragmented but Interconnected Global Order, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 959–90.
61. Tennyson, Baron Alfred Tennyson (1881). The Works of Alfred Tennyson: Locksley Hall, and Other Poems (Philadelphia, PA: Gebbie & Co).
62. Tiebout, Charles M. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, ” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 416–24.
63. Union of International Associations (2012). “Statistics: International Organizations by Year and Type 1909–1999” (Table 2) Yearbook of International Organizations (Brussels: Union of International Associations), available at http://www. uia.be/statistics-international-organizations-year-and-type-1909–1999.
64. United States Trade Representative (2009). “United States Initiates NAFTA Dispute with Mexico over Mexico’s Failure to Move Its Tuna-Dolphin Dispute from the WTO to the NAFTA, ” USTR Press Office, November.
65. Wallace, Michael, and J. David Singer (1970). “Intergovernmental Organization in the Global System, 1815–1964: A Quantitative Description, ” International Organization, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 239–87.
66. Wedgwood, Ruth (2005). “Give the United Nations a Little Competition, ” New York Times, 5 December.
67. Weiss, Edith Brown (1993). “International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order, ” Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 675710.
68. Young, Oran R. (1996). “Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives, ” Global Governance, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–23.
69. (2002). The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale (Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
70. Young, Oran R., W. Bradnee Chambers, Joy A. Kim, and Claudia ten Have (2008) (eds.).Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade (Hong Kong: United Nations University Press).
71. Zakaria, Fareed (2008). The Post-American World (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.).