Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

Volumn 97, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 635-642

  De Steiger, Richard N ^a   Liu, Yen Liang ^a   Graves, Stephen E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

AGE; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BONE EROSION; COMPUTER NAVIGATED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INFECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SEX; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ADULT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84928190464     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01496     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Attar FG, Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Gregg PJ. Survivorship analysis at 15 years of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Apr; 23(3):344-9. Epub 2007 Nov. 26.
2. Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 7;93(17):1588-96.
3. Graves SE, Davidson D, de Steiger R. Hip and knee arthroplasty 2013 annual report - National Joint Replacement Registry. Adelaide: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. 2013. https://aoanjrr.dmac. adelaide.edu.au/documents/10180/127202/Annual%20Report%202013?version=1.2&t=1385685288617. Accessed 2014 Dec. 8.
4. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7) (Suppl 3):132-8.
5. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Jul; 86(5):682-7.
6. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computernavigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computernavigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Apr; 20(3):282-8.
7. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kubo S, Kitagawa A, Chin T, Iguchi T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R. Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jul; 19(7):1107-12. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
8. Weng YJ, Hsu RW, Hsu WH. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug; 24(5):668-73. Epub 2008 Jun. 4.
9. Zhang GQ, Chen JY, Chai W, Liu M, Wang Y. Comparison between computerassistednavigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul. 6;93(13):1190-6.
10. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Aug; 85(6):830-5.
11. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(Suppl 2):90-8.
12. Rauh MA, Krackow KA. Rationale for computer-assisted orthopaedic knee surgery. In: DiGioia A, Branislav J, Picard F, Nolte L-P, editors. Computer and robotic assisted knee and hip surgery. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. p 113-26.
13. de Steiger RN, Miller LN, Davidson DC, Ryan P, Graves SE. Joint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses. Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug; 84(4):348-52.
14. Zamora LA, Humphreys KJ, Watt AM, Forel D, Cameron AL. Systematic review of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg. 2013 Jan; 83(1-2):22-30. Epub 2012 Sep. 18.
15. Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep; 24(6) (Suppl):39-43. Epub 2009 Jun. 24.
16. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Sep; 73(5):709-14.
17. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep 15;92(12):2143-9.
18. Bonner TJ, Eardley WGP, Patterson P, Gregg PJ. The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Sep; 93(9):1217-22.
19. Cheng T, Pan XY, Mao X, Zhang GY, Zhang XL. Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. Knee. 2012 Aug; 19(4):237-45. Epub 2011 Nov. 29.
20. Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty. 2012 May; 27(5):667-72.e1. Epub 2011 Sep. 29.
21. Hernández-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S. Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec; 469(12):3436-42. Epub 2011 Aug. 27.
22. Hoppe S, Mainzer JD, Frauchiger L, Ballmer PM, Hess R, Zumstein MA. More accurate component alignment in navigated total knee arthroplasty has no clinical benefit at 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec; 83(6):629-33. Epub 2012 Nov. 11.
23. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up? Int Orthop. 2009 Dec; 33(6):1567-70. Epub 2008 Nov. 26.
24. Lüring C, Kauper M, Bäthis H, Perlick L, Beckmann J, Grifka J, Tingart M, Rath B. A five to seven year follow-up comparing computer-assisted vs freehand TKR with regard to clinical parameters. Int Orthop. 2012 Mar; 36(3):553-8. Epub 2011 Jun. 15.
25. Nakano N, Matsumoto T, Ishida K, Tsumura N, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. Longterm subjective outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013 Oct; 37(10):1911-5. Epub 2013 Jun. 27.
26. Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Li G, Kozanek M, Song EK. Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. Int Orthop. 2009 Aug; 33(4):987-90. Epub 2008 Jun. 28.
27. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Apr; 89(4):477-80.
28. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun; 24(4):560-9. Epub 2008 May 19.
29. Huang NF, Dowsey MM, Ee E, Stoney JD, Babazadeh S, Choong PF. Coronal alignment correlates with outcome after total knee arthroplasty: five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Oct; 27(9):1737-41. Epub 2012 Aug. 3.
30. Hoffart HE, Langenstein E, Vasak N. A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Feb; 94(2):194-9.
31. Johnson DR, Dennis DA, Kindsfater KA, Kim RH. Evaluation of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without computer navigation: a bilateral total knee arthroplasty study. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Mar; 28(3):455-8. Epub 2012 Nov. 17.
32. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Nov. 21;94(22):2017-24.
33. Maniar RN, Johorey AC, Pujary CT, Yadava AN. Margin of error in alignment: a study undertaken when converting from conventional to computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Jan; 26(1):82-7. Epub 2010 Feb. 19.
34. Smith BRK, Deakin AH, Baines J, Picard F. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: the learning curve. Comput Aided Surg. 2010;15(1-3):40-8.
35. Schnurr C, Güdden I, Eysel P, König DP. Influence of computer navigation on TKA revision rates. Int Orthop. 2012 Nov; 36(11):2255-60. Epub 2012 Sep. 5.
36. Gøthesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, Petursson G, Furnes O. Short-term outcome of 1, 465 computer-navigated primary total knee replacements 2005-2008. Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun; 82(3):293-300. Epub 2011 Apr. 19.
37. Gøthesen O., Slover J, Havelin L, Askildsen JE, Malchau H, Furnes O. An economic model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of computer assisted knee replacement surgery in Norway. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:202. Epub 2013 Jul. 6.
38. Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA. Computer navigationassisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov; 466(11):2756-62.
39. Hoke D, Jafari SM, Orozco F, Ong A. Tibial shaft stress fractures resulting from placement of navigation tracker pins. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Apr; 26(3):504.e5-8.
40. Jung KA, Lee SC, Ahn NK, Song MB, Nam CH, Shon OJ. Delayed femoral fracture through a tracker pin site after navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Apr; 26(3):505.e9-11. Epub 2010 Mar. 23.