More accurate component alignment in navigated total knee arthroplasty has no clinical benefit at 5-year follow-up

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 629-633

  Hoppe, Sven ^a   Mainzer, Jens D ^b   Frauchiger, Lars ^a,c   Ballmer, Peter M ^c   Hess, Rolf ^c   Zumstein, Matthias A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

^c Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL SCORE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SOCIETY TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ROENTGENOGRAPHIC EVALUATION AND SCORING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIME; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REFERENCE VALUES; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84870268829     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747923     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson K C, Buehler K C, Markel D C. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: Comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty (SUPPL3) 2005; 20 (7): 132-8. (Pubitemid 41425797)
2. Archibeck M J, White R E, Jr. What's new in adult reconstructive knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85 (7): 1404-11. (Pubitemid 36764965)
3. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86 (5): 682-7. (Pubitemid 39077216)
4. Benjamin J, Johnson R, Porter S. Knee scores change with length of followup after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (7): 867-71. (Pubitemid 37259688)
5. Bonutti P M, Dethmers D, Ulrich S D, Seyler T M, Mont M A. Computer navigation- assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: Benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop 2008; (466) (11): 2756-62.
6. de Boer A S, Geubbels E L, Wille J, Mintjes-de Groot A J. Risk assessment for surgical site infections following total hip and total knee prostheses. J Chemother 2001; 13 Spec No 1 (1): 42-7. (Pubitemid 34183593)
7. Delp S L, Stulberg S D, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1998; (354): 49-56. (Pubitemid 28424045)
8. DiGioia A M, 3rd, Jaramaz B, Colgan B D. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery. Image guided and robotic assistive technologies. Clin Orthop 1998; (354): 8-16. (Pubitemid 28424041)
9. Ecker M L, Lotke P A, Windsor R E, Cella J P. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop 1987; (216): 151-8.
10. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2007; (457): 156-62. (Pubitemid 46573409)
11. Ewald F C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989; (248): 9-12. (Pubitemid 20204774)
12. Gothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, Petursson G, Furnes O. Short-term outcome of 1,465 computer-navigated primary total knee replacements 2005- 2008. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (3): 293-300.
13. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kubo S, Kitagawa A, Chin T, et al. Midterm outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (7): 1107-12.
14. Jenny J Y, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W, Miehlke R K. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-imagebased navigation system: A case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (7): 832-9. (Pubitemid 41463681)
15. Krackow K A, Bayers-Thering M, Phillips M J, Bayers-Thering M, Mihalko W M. A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: Progress toward computer-assisted TKA. Orthopedics 1999; 22 (7): 698-702. (Pubitemid 29343117)
16. Mason J B, Fehring T K, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (8): 1097-106. (Pubitemid 350216994)
17. Molfetta L, Caldo D. Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: A case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 2008; 15 (2): 75-9.
18. Nabeyama R, Matsuda S, Miura H, Mawatari T, Kawano T, Iwamoto Y. The accuracy of image-guided knee replacement based on computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86 (3): 366-71. (Pubitemid 38559488)
19. Nizard R S, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Vangaver E, Hannouche D, Bizot P, et al. Use of the Cusum technique for evaluation of a CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 2004; (425): 180-8. (Pubitemid 39062768)
20. Rand J A, Trousdale R T, Ilstrup D M, Harmsen W S. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85 (2): 259-65. (Pubitemid 36538788)
21. Ritter M A, Faris P M, Keating E M, Meding J B. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994; (299): 153-6. (Pubitemid 24051713)
22. Schmitt J, Hauk C, Kienapfel H, Pfeiffer M, Efe T, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, et al. Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: Rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 16.
23. Spencer J M, Chauhan S K, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver R J. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: No difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89 (4): 477-80. (Pubitemid 46851126)
24. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2004; (426): 180-6. (Pubitemid 39167127)
25. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop 2004; (428): 131-9. (Pubitemid 39506164)
26. Vince K G. Why knees fail. J Arthroplasty (SUPPL1) 2003; 18 (3): 39-44. (Pubitemid 36542558)
27. Yau W P, Leung A, Chiu K Y, Tang W M, Ng T P. Intraobserver errors in obtaining visually selected anatomic landmarks during registration process in nonimage-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric experiment. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (5): 591-601. (Pubitemid 41073472)
28. Zumstein M A, Frauchiger L, Wyss D, Hess R, Ballmer P M. Is restricted femoral navigation sufficient for accuracy of total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 2006; (451): 80-6. (Pubitemid 44511310)