Systematic review of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 83, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 22-30

  Zamora, Luis A ^a   Humphreys, Karen J ^a   Watt, Amber M ^a   Forel, Deanne ^a   Cameron, Alun L ^a  

^a ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS   (Australia)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Computer assisted; Knee; Meta analysis; Orthopaedic procedures; Replacement; Review; Surgery

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONVALESCENCE; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; ODDS RATIO; OPERATIVE TIME; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84873023451     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06255.x     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Brooks PM. The burden of musculoskeletal disease - a global perspective. Clin. Rheumatol. 2006; 25: 778-781.
2. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster J-Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2004; 86-A: 963-974.
3. Siston RA, Giori NJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL. Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a perspective. J. Biomech. 2007; 40: 728-735.
4. Dong H, Coyle D, Buxton M. Value of information analysis for a new technology: computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 2007; 23: 337-342.
5. Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC). Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2009.
6. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence. Canberra; 2000.
7. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
8. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D etal. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 2001; 134: 663-694.
9. Barrett WP, Mason JB, Moskal JT, Dalury DF, Oliashirazi A, Fisher DA. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 1273-1284.
10. Blakeney WG, Khan RJ, Wall SJ. Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011; 93: 1377-1384.
11. Bejek Z, Solyom L, Szendroi M. Experiences with computer navigated total knee arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2007; 31: 617-622.
12. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004; 86: 372-377.
13. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J. Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 618-626.
14. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 560-569.
15. Church JS, Scadden JE, Gupta RR, Cokis C, Williams KA, Janes GC. Embolic phenomena during computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2007; 89: 481-485.
16. Conteduca F, Massai F, Iorio R, Zanzotto E, Luzon D, Ferretti A. Blood loss in computer-assisted mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with a conventional technique. Int. Orthop. 2009; 33: 1609-1613.
17. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf H-P. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J. Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 282-288.
18. Decking R, Markmann Y, Mattes T, Puhl W, Scharf HP. On the outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech. 2007; 74: 171-174.
19. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 2007; 457: 156-162.
20. Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. J. Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 667-672.
21. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Sandoval-Garcia MA, Noriega-Fernandez A. Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity. Clin. Orthop. 2010; 468: 1237-1241.
22. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S. Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011; 469: 3436-3442.
23. Hinarejos P, Corrales M, Matamalas A, Bisbe E, Caceres E. Computer-assisted surgery can reduce blood loss after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2009; 17: 356-360.
24. Hiscox CM, Bohm ER, Turgeon TR, Hedden DR, Burnell CD. Randomized trial of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: impact on clinical and radiographic outcomes. J. Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 1259-1264.
25. Huang NFR, Dowsey MM, Ee E, Stoney JD, Babazadeh S, Choong PF. Coronal alignment correlates with outcome after total knee arthroplasty: five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J. Arthroplasty 2012; doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.058.
26. Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2005; 87: 1480-1482.
27. Kalairajah Y, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Ludbrook G, Spriggins AJ. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery?: a prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2006; 88: 198-202.
28. Kim Y-H, Kim J-S, Hong K-S, Kim Y-J, Kim J-H. Prevalence of fat embolism after total knee arthroplasty performed with or without computer navigation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2008; 90: 123-128.
29. Lee D-H, Park J-H, Song D-I, Padhy D, Jeong W-K, Han S-B. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 381-387.
30. Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Gunther KP, Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2008; 90: 1039-1044.
31. Lutzner J, Gunther K-P, Kirschner S. Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 1339-1344.
32. Macule-Beneyto F, Hernandez-Vaquero D, Segur-Vilalta JM etal. Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study. Int. Orthop. 2006; 30: 536-540.
33. Martin A, Sheinkop MB, Langhenry MM, Widemschek M, Benesch T, von Strempel A. Comparison of two minimally invasive implantation instrument-sets for total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 359-366.
34. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007; 89: 236-243.
35. Mombert M, Van Den Daelen L, Gunst P, Missinne L. Navigated total knee arthroplasty: a radiological analysis of 42 randomised cases. Acta Orthop. Belg. 2007; 73: 49-54.
36. O'Connor MI, Brodersen MP, Feinglass NG, Leone BJ, Crook JE, Switzer BE. Fat emboli in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study of computer-assisted navigation vs standard surgical technique. J. Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 1034-1040.
37. Ooi LH, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Ong BC, Ding ZP, Lefi A. Does computer-assisted surgical navigation total knee arthroplasty reduce venous thromboembolism compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty? Singapore Med. J. 2008; 49: 610-614.
38. Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Li G, Kozanek M, Song EK. Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. Int. Orthop. 2009; 33: 987-990.
39. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2007; 89: 477-480.
40. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 2004; 426: 180-186.
41. Weinrauch P, Myers N, Wilkinson M, Dodsworth J, Fitzpatrick P, Whitehouse S. Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. J. Orthop. Surg. 2006; 14: 47-52.
42. Zhang GQ, Chen JY, Chai W, Liu M, Wang Y. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011; 93: 1190-1196.
43. Zhang XL, Zhang W, Shao JJ. Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: nonimage-based navigation system versus conventional technique. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.) 2012; 125: 236-243.
44. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin. Orthop. 1989; 248: 13-14.