Influence of computer navigation on TKA revision rates

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2255-2260

  Schnurr, Christoph ^a   Güdden, Isabell ^a   Eysel, Peer ^b   König, Dietmar Pierre ^a  

^a LVR Clinic of Orthopedic Surgery   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GERMANY; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84876531524     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1606-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Mont MA (2008) Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(11):2730-2735
2. Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Warth LC (2006) Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 21(4 Suppl 1):27-28
3. Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA (2008) Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(11):2756-2762
4. Hoke D, Jafari SM, Orozco F, Ong A (2011) Tibial shaft stress fractures resulting from placement of navigation tracker pins. J Arthroplasty 26(3):504-508
5. Berend ME (2009) Computer-assisted TKA: greater precision, doubtful clinical efficacy: affirms. Orthopedics 32 (9):orthosupersite-24
6. Gothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, Petursson G, Furnes O (2011) Short-term outcome of 1,465 computer-navigated primary total knee replacements 2005-2008. Acta Orthop 82(3):293-300
7. Bathis H, Shafizadeh S, Paffrath T, Simanski C, Grifka J, Luring C (2006) Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthopade 35(10):1056-1065
8. Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J (2011) Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop 35(3):331-339
9. Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Fu Q (2011) Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. [epub ahead of print; doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1695-6 ]
10. Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 24(6 Suppl):39-43
11. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153-156
12. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26-34
13. Mullaji A, Shetty GM (2009) Computer-assisted TKA: greater precision, doubtful clinical efficacy: opposes. Orthopedics 32 (9):orthosupersite-25
14. No authors listed (2011) The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register - Annual Report 2011 Part II
15. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the 15-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(12):2143-2149
16. Khan MM, Khan MW, Al-Harbi HH, Weening BS, Zalzal PK (2012) Assessing short-term functional outcomes and knee alignment of computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(2):271-277
17. Lutzner J, Gunther KP, Kirschner S (2010) Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(10):1339-1344
18. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S (2011) Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(12):3436-3442
19. Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ (2011) Computer Navigation vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty 5-year Functional Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. [epub ahead of print; doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.009 ]
20. Pang HN, Yeo SJ, Chong HC, Chin PL, Ong J, Lo NN (2011) Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [epub ahead of print; doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1483-3 ]
21. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kubo S, Kitagawa A, Chin T, Iguchi T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2011) Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(7):1107-1112
22. Luring C, Kauper M, Bathis H, Perlick L, Beckmann J, Grifka J, Tingart M, Rath B (2012) A 5 to 7 year follow-up comparing computer-assisted vs freehand TKR with regard to clinical parameters. Int Orthop 36(3):553-558
23. Hoffart HE, Langenstein E, Vasak N (2012) A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(2):194-199
24. Cheng T, Pan XY, Mao X, Zhang GY, Zhang XL (2011) Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. Knee. [epub ahead of print; doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.10.001 ]
25. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry D, Parvizi J (2010) Prosthetic joint infection risk after TKA in the Medicare population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):52-56