Joint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 348-352

  De Steiger, Richard N ^a,b   Miller, Lisa N ^a   Davidson, David C ^b   Ryan, Philip ^a   Graves, Stephen E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; REGISTER; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84883467083     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2013.831320     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report Adelaide: AOA; 2004 Annual Report-Australian Registry.
2. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report Adelaide: AOA; 2006 Annual Report-Australian Registry.
3. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report Adelaide: AOA; 2007 Annual Report-Australian Registry.
4. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report Adelaide: AOA; 2008 Annual Report-Australian Registry Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report Adelaide: AOA; 2011 Annual Report-Australian Registry.
5. De Steiger R N, Hang J R, Miller L N, Graves S E, Davidson D C. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: An analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2011; 93 (24): 2287- 93
6. Dobbs H S. Survivorship of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1980; 62: 168-73
7. Espenhaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I. 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norweigian Arthroplasty Register: Concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (4): 402-12
8. Fevang B T S, Lie S A, Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Furnes O. Improved results of primary total hip replacement: Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1987-2007. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (6): 649-59
9. Graves S E. The value of arthroplasty registry data. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(1): 8-9
10. Graves S E, Davidson D, Ingerson L, Ryan P, GriffiThe C, McDermott B F J, McElroy J and Pratt N L. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Med J Aust (5 Suppl) 2004; 180: S31-4
11. Hallan G, Lie S A, Furnes O, Engesaeter L B, Vollset S E, Havelin L I. Medium and long-term performance of 11 516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89 (12): 1574-80
12. Hardoon S L, Lewsey J D, Gregg P J, Reeves B C, Van der Meulen J H P. Continuous monitoring of the performance of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88 (6): 716-20
13. Hauser R G. Here we go again-Another failure of postmarketing device surveillance. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (10) : 873-5
14. Heard G C, Sanderson P M, Thomas RD. Barriers to adverse event and error reporting in anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2012; 114 (3): 604-14
15. Herberts P M H. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop 1997; (344): 44-60
16. Herberts P M H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 72 (2): 111-21
17. Kolling C, Simmen B R, Labek G, Goldhahn J. Key factors for a successful National Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2007; 89 (12): 1567-73
18. McGee R G, Webster A C, Rogerson T E, Craid J C. Medical device regulation in Australia: Safe and effective? Med J Aust 2012; 196 (4): 256-60
19. National Joint Registry for England and Wales; Annual Report 2011
20. Prosser G H, Yates P J, Wood D J, Graves S E, de Steiger R N, Miller L N. Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: Evaluation of risk factors for early revision: 12,093 replacements from the Australian Joint Registry. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (1): 66-71
21. Ranstam J, Robertsson O. Statistical analysis of arthroplasty register data. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(1): 10-4
22. Ranstam J K J, Pulkkinen P, Mäkelä K, Espenhaug B, Pedersen A B, Mhnert F, Furnes O. NARA study group. Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data 1 Introduction and background. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (3): 253-7
23. Robertsson O. Knee arthroplasty registers. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89 (1): 1-4
24. Robertsson O, Lidgren L. The short term results of 3 common UKA implants during different time periods in Sweden. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (6): 801- 7
25. Rothman K J G S. Modern epidemiology, Chapter 3. Measures of disease frequency. Incidence rates. Person-time. 2nd ed. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia 1998; 31-2
26. Söderman P M H, Herberts P. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part 1 General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (4): 354-9
27. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register - Annual Report 2010
28. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register - Annual Report 2010
29. TGA Reforms: A blueprint for TGA's future. (Ed Aging CDoHa). Woden ACT; 2011 TGA Reforms.
30. TGA Regulation impact statement for reclassification of hip, knee and shoulder joint implants. Version 1.0, May 2012. http://www.tga.gov.au/pdf/ devices-ris-reclassification-implants-120514.pdf.
31. The New Zealand Joint Registry-Twelve Year Report-January 1999 to December 2010. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association; 2011 Annual Report-New Zealand. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Registry - Annual Report 2010
32. Zuckerman D M, Brown P, Nissen S E. Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171 (11): 1006-11
33. Willis C D, McNeil J J, Cameron P A, Phillips L E. Monitoring drug safety with registries: Useful components of postmarketing pharmacovigilance systems. J Clin Epidemiol 2012; 65 (2): 121-5