Computer Navigation vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. Five-Year Functional Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Harvie, Paul ^a   Sloan, Karen ^a   Beaver, Richard J ^a  

^a ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Computer navigation; Perth CT protocol; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER NAVIGATION TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT DURATION;

EID: 84859902094     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Australian National Joint Replacement Registry. Computer assisted surgery in primary total knee replacement between 2006 and 2008 Request ID: 447. 2010.
2. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 6th Annual Report. NJR Centre, Hemel Hempstead; 2009:72.
3. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004, 86-B-3:372.
4. Decking R Markmann Y., Fuchs J., et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised trial comparing computer-navigation and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20-3:282.
5. Seon J.K., Song E.K. Functional impact of navigation-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005, 28-10:1251.
6. Choong P., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24-4:560.
7. Bauwens K., Mattes G., Wich M., et al. Navigated total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007, 89-A-2:261.
8. Mason J.B.F.T., Estok R., Banel D., et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22-8:1097.
9. Chauhan SK Clark G.W., Lloyd S., Scott R.G., et al. Computer-assisted total knee replacement: a controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004, 86-B-6:818.
10. Spencer J.M., Chauhan S.K., Sloan K., et al. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007, 89-B-4:477.
11. American Medical Association Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment 1995, 549. 5th ed.
12. Insall J.N., Dore L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13.
13. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes in antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833.
14. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 26-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care 1992, 30:473.
15. Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Dewey J. How to score version 2 of the SF-36 health survey 2000, Quality Metric Incorporated, Lincoln RI.
16. Stryker Knee navigation: operative technique 2008, 2.
17. Rand J.A., Coventry M.B. Evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 12:677.
18. Ritter M.A., Faris P., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 299:153.
19. Jonsson B., Aström J. Alignment and long term clinical results of a semiconstrained knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 226:124.
20. Ma H.M., Lu Y.C., Ho F.Y., et al. Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:580.
21. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991, 73-B-5:709.
22. Sikorski J.M. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008, 90-B-9:1121.
23. Sikorski J.M. Computer-assisted revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004, 86-B-4:510.
24. Parratte S., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010, 92:2143.
25. Wylde V., Blom A. The failure of survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011, 93:569.