Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA : BBenefits and drawbacks

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 466, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2756-2762

  Bonutti, Peter M ^a   Dethmers, Daniel ^a   Ulrich, Slif D ^b   Seyler, Thorsten M ^b   Mont, Michael A ^b  

^a Bonutti Clinic   (United States)

^b SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BLEEDING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR SHAFT FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 54449089457     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0429-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. PM Bonutti MA Mont M McMahon PS Ragland M Kester 2004 Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 Suppl 2 26 32
2. CW Chang CY Yang 2006 Kinematic navigation in total knee replacement-experience from the first 50 cases J Formos Med Assoc 105 468 474
3. SK Chauhan RG Scott W Breidahl RJ Beaver 2004 Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 372 377
4. PL Chin KY Yang SJ Yeo NN Lo 2005 Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique J Arthroplasty 20 618 626
5. DF Dalury DA Dennis 2005 Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment Clin Orthop Relat Res 440 77 81
6. R Decking Y Markmann J Fuchs W Puhl HP Scharf 2005 Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation J Arthroplasty 20 282 288
7. AQ Dutton SJ Yeo KY Yang NN Lo KU Chia HC Chong 2008 Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 2 9
8. A Ensini F Catani A Leardini M Romagnoli S Giannini 2007 Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 457 156 162
9. FC Ewald 1989 The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 9 12
10. RG Haaker M Stockheim M Kamp G Proff J Breitenfelder A Ottersbach 2005 Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 433 152 159
11. SB Haas MA Manitta P Burdick 2006 Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the mini midvastus approach Clin Orthop Relat Res 452 112 116
12. HT Huang JY Su JK Chang CH Chen GJ Wang 2007 The early clinical outcome of minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty: report of a 2-year follow-up J Arthroplasty 22 1007 1012
13. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott WN Scott 1989 Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 13 14
14. J King DL Stamper DC Schaad SS Leopold 2007 Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 1497 1503
15. FR Kolisek PM Bonutti WJ Hozack J Purtill PF Sharkey SB Zelicof PS Ragland M Kester MA Mont RH Rothman 2007 Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach J Arthroplasty 22 8 13
16. AV Lombardi Jr AJ Viacava KR Berend 2006 Rapid recovery protocols and minimally invasive surgery help achieve high knee flexion Clin Orthop Relat Res 452 117 122
17. A Martin A von Strempel 2006 Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties Clin Orthop Relat Res 449 275 282
18. G Matziolis D Krocker U Weiss S Tohtz C Perka 2007 A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 236 243
19. JK Seon EK Song 2006 Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial J Arthroplasty 21 777 782
20. M Sparmann B Wolke H Czupalla D Banzer A Zink 2003 Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 830 835
21. B Stockl M Nogler R Rosiek M Fischer M Krismer O Kessler 2004 Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 180 186
22. SD Stulberg MA Yaffe SS Koo 2006 Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 Suppl 4 47 54
23. Y Tashiro H Miura S Matsuda K Okazaki Y Iwamoto 2007 Minimally invasive versus standard approach in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 463 144 150
24. AJ Tria Jr TM Coon 2003 Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience Clin Orthop Relat Res 416 185 190