A five to seven year follow-up comparing computer-assisted vs freehand TKR with regard to clinical parameters

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 553-558

  Luring C ^a   Kauper, M ^b   Bathis H ^c   Perlick, L ^d   Beckmann, J ^b   Grifka, J ^b   Tingart, M ^a   Rath, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^c Merheim Medical Center   (Germany)

^d Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84859158665     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1297-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Glant TT, Jacobs JJ (1994) Response of three murine macrophage populations to particulate debris: bone resorption in organ cultures. J Orthop Res 12:720-731 (Pubitemid 24323695)
2. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS (2001) Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:10-17 (Pubitemid 32595001)
3. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7-13
4. Chen FS, Scher DM, Clancy RM, Vera-Yu A, Di Cesare PE (1999) In vitro and in vivo activation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in response to particulate debris. J Biomed Mater Res 48:904-912
5. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1997) Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:79-86 (Pubitemid 28007489)
6. Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Urban RM (1998) Corrosion of metal orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:268-282 (Pubitemid 28103392)
7. Kubo T, Sawada K, Hirakawa K, Shimizu C, Takamatsu T, Hirasawa Y (1999) Histiocyte reaction in rabbit femurs to UHMWPE, metal, and ceramic particles in different sizes. J Biomed Mater Res 45:363-369 (Pubitemid 29196683)
8. Woolson ST, Northrop GD (2004) Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplasty 19:135-140 (Pubitemid 38228792)
9. Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:67-72
10. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CJH, Allen PW (2001) The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 16:635-640 (Pubitemid 32751451)
11. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:49-56 (Pubitemid 28424045)
12. Laskin RS (2003) Instrumentation pitfalls: you just can't go on autopilot! J Arthroplasty 18:18-22
13. Novotny J, Gonzalez MH, Amirouche FM, Li YC (2001) Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:641-647 (Pubitemid 32751452)
14. Reed SC, Gollish J (1997) The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:677-682 (Pubitemid 27427947)
15. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(5):682-687 (Pubitemid 39077216)
16. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D (2007) Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2):261-269 (Pubitemid 46214342)
17. Bolognesi M, Hofmann A (2005) Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:162-169 (Pubitemid 41579210)
18. Jenny JY, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W, Miehlke RK (2005) Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 20:832-889
19. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE (2009) Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up? Int Orthop 33(6):1567-1570
20. Lüring C, Oczipka F, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J, Bäthis H (2009) Two year follow-up comparing computer assisted versus freehand TKR on joint stability, muscular function and patients satisfaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(3):228-232
21. Martin A, von Strempel A (2006) Two year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 449:275-282 (Pubitemid 44231820)
22. Molfetta L, Caldo D (2008) Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 15(2):75-79
23. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Stevens J, Pilch L, Stewart C, Mahmood Z (1997) Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA 3.0 Osteoarthritis Index. J Rheumatol 24(12):2413-2415 (Pubitemid 28005145)
24. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott R, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13-14 (Pubitemid 20204775)
25. Bachmeier C, March L, Cross M, Lapsley H, Tribe K, Courtenay BG et al (2001) A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9:137-146 (Pubitemid 32229263)