Classroom assessment: Teacher practices, student perceptions, and academic self-efficacy beliefs

Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 835-856

  Alkharusi, Hussain ^a   Aldhafri, Said ^a   Alnabhani, Hilal ^a   Alkalbani, Muna ^b  

^a SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY   (Oman)

^b Ministry of Education Sultanate of Oman   (Oman)

Author keywords

Academic self efficacy; Classroom assessment practices; Educational assessment; Student perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928155709     PISSN: 03012212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.5.835     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alkharusi, H. (2008). Effects of classroom assessment practices on students’ achievement goals. Educational Assessment, 13,243-266. http://doi.org/fsjv3q
2. Alkharusi, H. (2009). Classroom assessment environment, self-efficacy, and mastery goal orientation: A causal model. In S. Heo (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning: Achieving Educational Excellence through a Student Centred Approach (pp. 104-116). INTI University College, Kuching, Malaysia.
3. Alkharusi, H. (2010), A multilevel linear model of teachers’ assessment practices and students’ perceptions of the classroom assessment environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5,5-11. http://doi.org/cfgxcd
4. Alkharusi, H. (2011). Hierarchical linear models: Applications in educational assessment research. Educational Research Journal, 26,41-69.
5. Alkharusi, H. (2013). Canonical correlational models of students’ perceptions of assessment tasks, motivational orientations, and learning strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 6,21-38.
6. Alkharusi, H., Aldhafri, S., Alnabhani, H., & Alkalbani, M. (2012). Educational assessment attitudes, competence, knowledge, and practices: An exploratory study of Muscat teachers in the Sultanate of Oman. Journal of Education and Learning, /,217-232. http://dol.org/r7f
7. Alkharusi, H., Aldhafri, S., Alnabhani, H., & Alkalbani, M. (2014). Modeling the relationship between perceptions of assessment tasks and classroom assessment environment as a function of gender. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23,93-104. http://dol.org/r7g
8. Airasian, P. W. (1996). Assessment in the classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Alsarimi, A. M. (2000). Classroom assessment and grading practices in the Sultanate of Oman. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
10. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9, 30-32. http://dof.org/cq3g83
11. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22,269-298. http://doi.org/hqqw36
12. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5,7-74. http://doi.org/fpnss4
14. Bol, L., Stephenson, P. L., O’Connell, A. A., & Nunnery, J. A. (1998). Influence of experience, grade level, and subject area on teachers’ assessment practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 91,323-330. http://dol.org/c6rxvp
15. Brookhart, S. M. (1994). Teachers’ grading: Practice and theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 7,279-301. http://doi.org/c3pfhz
16. Brookhart, S. M. (1997). A theoretical framework for the role of classroom assessment in motivating student effort and achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 10,161-180. http://doi.org/c9jmtr
17. Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30,3-12. http://doi.org/cwcqj4
18. Brookhart, S. M. (2013a). Classroom assessment in the context of motivation. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 35-54). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
19. Brookhart, S. M. (2013b). Grading. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 257-271). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
20. Brookhart, S. M., Walsh, J. M., & Zientarski, W. A. (2006). The dynamics of motivation and effort for classroom assessment in middle school science and social studies. Applied Measurement in Education, 19,151-184. http://doi.org/ff3gdc
21. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58,438-481. http://doi.org/dvd8nf
22. Dhindsa, H., Omar, K., & Waldrip, B. (2007). Upper secondary Bruneian science students' perceptions of assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 29,1261-1280. http://doi.org/c2k4d6
23. Dorman, J. P., Fisher, D. L., & Waldrip, B. G. (2006). Classroom environment, students’ perceptions of assessment, academic efficacy and attitude to science: A LISREL analysis. In D. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environment: Worldviews (pp. 1-28). Singapore: World Scientific.
24. Dorman, J. P., & Knightley, W. M. (2006). Development and validation of an instrument to assess secondary school students’ perceptions of assessment tasks. Educational Studies, 32, 47-58. http://doi.org/fcp9qc
25. Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A system approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18,27-32. http://doi.org/fjtnvd
26. Gronlund, N. E. (2006). Assessment of student achievement (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
27. Harlen, W., & Crick, R. D. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10,169-207. http://doi.org/cmz75v
28. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2001). Multiple goals, multiple contexts: The dynamic interplay between personal goals and contextual goal stresses. In S. Volet & S. JSrveltt (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts (pp. 251-270). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
29. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31,313-327.
30. Lyon, E. G. (2011). Beliefs, practices and reflection: Exploring a science teacher’s classroom assessment through the assessment triangle model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 417-435. http://doi.org/d3wH9
31. McMillan, J. H., Myran, S., & Workman, D. (2002). Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 95,203-213. http://doi.org/fni9gp
32. McMillan, J. H., & Workman, D. J. (1998). Classroom assessment and grading practices: A review of the literature. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED453263.
33. Meece, J. L., Herman, P., & McCombs, B. L. (2003). Relations of learner-centered teaching practices to adolescents’ achievement goals. International Journal of Educational Research, 39,457-475. http://doi.org/d6vfT8
34. Mertler, C. A. (1998, October). Classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
35. Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22, 155-175. http://doi.org/cgqtqx
36. Natriello, G., & Dombusch, S. M. (1984). Teacher evaluative standards and student effort. New York: Wiley.
37. Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational assessment of students (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38. Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39. Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. http://doi.org/frv26r
40. Randel, B., & Clark, T. (2013). Measuring classroom assessment practices. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 145-163). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
41. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Rodriguez, M. C. (2004). The role of classroom assessment in student performance on TIMSS. Applied Measurement in Education, 17,1-24. http://doi.org/c7pv82
43. Rodriguez, M. C., & Haladyna, T. M. (2013). Writing selected-response items for classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 293-311). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
44. Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory Into Practice, 44,11-18. http://doi.org/dckdhb
45. Stiggins, R. J. (1994). Student-centered classroom assessment. New York: Merrill.
46. Stiggins, R. J., Frisbie, D. A., & Griswold, P. A. (1989). Inside high school grading practices: Building a research agenda. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 5-14. http://doi.org/brbfqq
47. Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: AUyn and Bacon.
48. van de Watering, G., Gijbels, D, Dochy, F., & van der Rijt, J. (2008). Students' assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results. Higher Education, 56,645-658. http://doi.org/d9v5rh
49. Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers' self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16, 323-342. http://doi.org/fs3swc