Beliefs, Practices, and Reflection: Exploring a Science Teacher's Classroom Assessment Through the Assessment Triangle Model

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 417-435

  Lyon, Edward G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment practices; Classroom assessment; Qualitative methods; Teacher beliefs

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961014853     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-011-9241-4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers' opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory into Practice, 42, 18-29.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 9-21.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-148.
5. Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M., & Rachor, R. A. (1995). Teachers' assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159-179.
6. Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 247-266.
7. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 120-138.
8. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
9. Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4, 37-73.
10. Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38, 47-65.
11. Gearhart, M., Nagashima, S., Pfotenhauer, J., Clark, S., Schwab, C., & Vendlinski, T. et al. (2006). Developing expertise with classroom assessment in K-12 Science: Learning to interpret student work. Interim findings from a 2-year study. Educational Assessment, 11(3-4), 237-263.
12. Gitomer, D. H., & Duschl, R. A. (1998). Emerging issues and practices in science assessment. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 791-810). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
13. Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 47-63.
14. Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067-1104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Klassen, S. (2006). Contextual assessment in science education: Background, issues, and policy. Science & Education, 90, 820-851.
16. Lee, O. (2004). Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 65-93.
17. Luykx, A., & Lee, O. (2007). Measuring instructional congruence in elementary science classrooms: Pedagogical and methodological components of a theoretical framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 424-447.
18. Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 333-368.
19. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London, England: King's College London.
20. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. Orpwood, G. (2001). The role of assessment in science curriculum reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 8, 135-151.
24. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
25. Pedulla, J. J., Abrams, L. M., Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., Ramos, M. A., et al. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.
26. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). The nature of assessment and reasoning from evidence. In J. W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment (pp. 37-54). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Remesal, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers' conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study. Teaching and teacher education, 27, 472-482.
28. Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 37-75). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Rhetoric and reality in science performance assessments: An update. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1045-1063.
30. Shaver, A., Cuevas, P., Lee, O., & Avalos, M. (2007). Teachers' perceptions of policy influences on science instruction with culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 725-746.
31. Shaw, J. M. (1997). Threats to the validity of science performance assessments for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 721-743.
32. Shaw, J. M. (2005). Getting things right at the classroom level. In J. L. Herman & E. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The 104th yearbook of the national academy society for the study of education, part 2 (pp. 340-357). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
33. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
34. Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553-573.
35. Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664-687.
36. Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45-93). New York, NY: Macmillan.
37. Treagust, D. F., Jacobowitz, R., Gallagher, J. L., & Parker, J. (2001). Using assessment as a guide in teaching for understanding: A case study of a middle school science class learning about sound. Science & Education, 85, 137-157.
38. Webb, N. M. (1995). Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 239-261.
39. Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Council of chief state school officers and National institute for science education research monograph no. 6. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
40. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118.
41. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
42. Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 181-208.
43. Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., et al. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 335-359.
44. Yung, B. H. W. (2006). Assessment reform in science: Fairness and fear. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.