Metacognition in self-regulated multimedia learning: integrating behavioural, psychophysiological and introspective measures

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 187-209

  Antonietti, Alessandro ^a   Colombo, Barbara ^a   Di Nuzzo, Chiara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biofeedback; Eye movements; Metacognition; Multimedia learning; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926410528     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2014.933112     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andreassi, J. L. 2006. Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Antonietti, A., and B. Colombo. 2008. “Computer-supported Learning Tools: A Bi-circular Bi-directional Framework.” New Ideas In Psychology 26 (1): 120–142. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.08.001
3. Antonietti, A., and B. Colombo. 2014. “Learning from Multimedia Artifacts: The Role of Metacognition.” In Reflective Thinking in Educational Settings: A Cultural Framework, edited by A. Antonietti, E. Confalonieri, and A. Marchetti, 55–101. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Antonietti, A., B. Colombo, P. Iannello, and Y. Inal. 2011. “Students' Metacognitive Knowledge about Distance Education in Virtual Communities and Multimedia Environments: A Cross-cultural Study.” In Distance Education, edited by C. F. MacTeer, 199–211. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
5. Antonietti, A., B. Colombo, and Y. Lozotsev. 2008. “Undergraduates' Metacognitive Knowledge about the Psychological Effects of Different Kinds of Computer-supported Instructional Tools.” Computers in Human Behavior 24 (5): 2172–2198. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.004
6. Antonietti, A., and M. Giorgetti. 2004. “Students’ Conceptions about Learning from Multimedia.” In Instructional Design for Multimedia Learning, edited by H. Niegemann, R. Brünken, and D. Leutner, 249–265. Münster: Waxmann.
7. Antonietti, A., and M. Giorgetti. 2006. “Teachers’ Beliefs about Psychological Aspects of Learning Through Multimedia.” Computers in Human Behavior 22 (2): 267–282. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.002
8. Azevedo, R., D. C. Moos, A. M. Johnson, and A. D. Chauncey. 2010. “Measuring Cognitive and Metacognitive Regulatory Processes During Hypermedia Learning: Issues and Challenges.” Educational Psychologist 45 (4): 210–223. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.515934
9. Azevedo, R., and A. C. Strein. 2011. “Integrating Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Affective Regulatory Processes with MetaTutor.” In New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies, edited by R. A. Calvo and S. K. D'Mello, 141–154. New York: Springer.
10. Bagui, S. 1998. “Reasons for Increased Learning Using Multimedia.” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 7 (1): 3–18.
11. Bendixen, L. D., and K. Hartley. 2003. “Successful Learning with Hypermedia: The Role of Epistemological Beliefs and Metacognitive Awareness.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 28 (1): 15–30. doi: 10.2190/2Y7C-KRDV-5U01-UJGA
12. Brown, A. 1987. “Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-regulation, and Other More Mysterious Mechanisms.” In Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, edited by F. E. Weinert and R. H. Kluwe, 65–116. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Chandler, P., and J. Sweller. 1991. “Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction.” Cognition and Instruction 8 (4): 293–332. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
14. Chuang, H.-H., and H.-C. Liu. 2012. “Effects of Different Multimedia Presentations on Viewers'Information-Processing Activities Measured by Eye-tracking Technology.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (2): 276–286. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9316-1
15. Clark, K. B., and D. L. Hassert. 2013. “Undecidability and Opacity of Metacognition in Animals and Humans.” Frontiers in Psychology 4, article 171. doi:103389/fpsyg.2013.00171
16. Clark, R. C., and R. E. Mayer. 2011. E-learning and the Science of Instruction. Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
17. Colombo, B., and A. Antonietti. 2006. “Are the Cognitive Principles Underlying Multimedia Learning Counterintuitive? A Study of Undergraduates' Folk Conceptions.” In Avoiding Simplicity, Confronting Complexity. Advances in Studying and Designing Powerful (Computer-based) Learning Environments, edited by G. Clarebout and J. Elen, 67–76. Rotterdam: Sense.
18. Colombo, B., and A. Antonietti. 2013. “Naïve Conceptions about Multimedia Learning: A Study Onprimary School Textbooks.” Frontiers in Psychology 4 (1): article 450. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00450
19. Dienes, Z., and J. Perner. 2002. “The Metacognitive Implications of the Implicit-explicit Distinction.” In Metacognition: Process, Function and Use, edited by P. Chambres, M. Izaute, P. Marescaux, P. Chambres, M. Izaute, and P. Marescaux, 171–189. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
20. Efklides, A. 2008. “Metacognition: Defining Its Facets and Levels of Functioning in Relation to Self-regulation and Co-regulation.” European Psychologist 13 (4): 277–287. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
21. Eitel, A., K. Scheiter, and A. Schüler. 2013. “How Inspecting a Picture Affects Processing of Text in Multimedia Learning.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 27 (4): 451–461. doi: 10.1002/acp.2922
22. Fioravanti, M, C. M. Polzonetti, D. Nocca, G. Spera, S. Falcone, R. Lazzari, and A. Colosimo. 2004. “Emotional Activation of Obese and Normal Women Due to Imagery and Food Content of Verbal Stimuli in a Memory Task.” Eating Behaviors 5 (1): 47–54. doi: 10.1016/S1471-0153(03)00063-1
23. Fleming, S. M., and R. J. Dolan. 2012. “The Neural Basis of Metacognitive Ability.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 367 (1594): 1338–1349. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0417
24. Frith, C. D. 2012. “The Role of Metacognition in Human Social Interactions.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 367 (1599): 2213–2223. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0123
25. Howard-Jones, P. A., and R. J. Martin. 2002. “The Effect of Questioning Concept Learning Within a Hypertext System.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18 (1): 10–20. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00203.x
26. Jacob, R. J. K., and K. S. Karn. 2003. “Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Ready to Deliver the Promises.” In The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, edited by J. Hyönä, R. Radach, and H. Deubel, 573–605. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Jereb, E., and B. Šmitek. 2006. “Applying Multimedia Instruction in e-Learning.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 (1): 15–27. doi: 10.1080/14703290500467335
28. Just, M. A., and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. “A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixation to Comprehension.” Psychological Review 87 (4): 329–354. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
29. Kim, Sonya, Vance Zemon, Marie M. Cavallo, Joseph F. Rath, Rollin McCraty, and Frederick W. Foley. 2013. “Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback, Executive Functioning and Chronic Brain Injury.” Brain Injury 27 (2): 209–222. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.729292
30. Koriat, A. 2012. “The Relationships Between Monitoring, Regulation and Performance.” Learning and Instruction 22 (4): 296–298. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.01.002
31. Koriat, A., H. Ma'ayan, and R. Nussinson. 2006. “The Intricate Relationships Between Monitoring and Control in Metacognition: Lessons for the Cause-and-effect Relation Between Subjective Experience and Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (1): 36–69. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36
32. Kramarski, B., and R. Ritkof. 2002. “The Effects of Metacognition and Email Interactions on Learning Graphing.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18 (1): 33–43. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00205.x
33. Lai, Hui-Ling, Yin-Ming Li, and Li-Hua Lee. 2012. “Effects of Music Intervention with Nursing Presence and Recorded Music on Psycho Physiological Indices of Cancer Patient Caregivers.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 21 (5–6): 745–756. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03916.x
34. Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 2006. “New Directions in Goal-setting Theory.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (5): 265–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
35. Manzey, D. 1998. “Psychophysiologie mentaler Beanspruchung.” In Ergebnisse und Anwendungen der Psychopysiologie: Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, C/I/5, edited by F. Rösler, 799–864. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
36. Mason, L., P. Pluchino, M. C. Tornatora, and N. Ariasi. 2013. “An Eye-tracking Study of Learning from Science Text with Concrete and Abstract Illustrations.” Journal of Experimental Education 81 (3): 356–384. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2012.727885
37. Mayer, R. E. 2001. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Mayer, R. E. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Mayer, R. E. 2008. Learning and Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
40. McCrudden, M. T., J. P. Magliano, and G. Schraw. 2011. “The Effect of Diagrams on Online Reading Processes and Memory.” Discourse Processes 48 (2): 69–92. doi: 10.1080/01638531003694561
41. Meyer, D. E., and D. E. Kieras. 1997. “An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance with Application to Human-computer Interaction.” Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 12 (4): 391–438. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1204_4
42. Moreno, R. 2005. “Instructional Technology: Promise and Pitfalls.” In Technology-based Education: Bringing Researchers and Practitioners Together, edited by L. Pytlik Zillig, M. Bodvarsson, and R. Bruning, 1–19. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
43. Mulder, G., L. J. M. Mulder, T. F. Meijman, J. P. B. Veldman, and A. M. van Roon. 2000. “A Psychophysiological Approach to Working Condition.” In Engineering Psychophysiology. Issue and Application, edited by R. W. Backs and W. Boucsein, 139–159. Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
44. Paivio, A. 1986. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45. Palomäki, J., I. Kosunen, K. Kuikkaniemi, T. Yamabe, and N. Ravaja. 2013. “Anticipatory Electrodermal Activity and Decision Making in a Computer Poker-game.” Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics 6 (1): 55–70. doi: 10.1037/npe0000002
46. Petty, R. E., and P. Briñol. 2009. “Understanding Discrepancies Between Automatic and Deliberative Measures of Attitudes: A Meta-cognitive Approach.” In Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures, edited by R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, and P. Briñol, 119–161. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Petty, R. E., S. C. Wheeler, and Z. L. Tormala. 2003. “Persuasion and Attitude Change.” In Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and Social Psychology, edited by T. Millon and M. J. Lerner, 353–382. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
48. Pieschl, S., E. Stahl, T. Murray, and R. Bromme. 2012. “Is Adaptation to Task Complexity Really Beneficial for Performance?” Learning and Instruction 22 (4): 281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.005
49. Prins, F. J., M. V. J. Veenman, and J. J. Elshout. 2006. “The Impact of Intellectual Ability and Metacognition on Learning: New Support for the Threshold of Problematicity Theory.” Learning and Instruction 16 (4): 374–387. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.008
50. Rozenblit, L., M. J. Spivey, and J. Wojslawowicz. 2002. “Mechanical Reasoning about Gear-and-belt Diagrams: Do Eye-movements Predict Performance?” In Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning, edited by M. Anderson, B. Meyer, and P. Olivier, 223–240. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
51. Schnotz, W., and M. Bannert. 2003. “Construction and Interference in Learning from Multiple Representations.” Learning and Instruction 13 (2): 141–156. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
52. Schraw, G., and D. Moshman. 1995. “Metacognitive Theories.” Educational Psychology Review 7 (4): 351–371. doi: 10.1007/BF02212307
53. Schwonke, R., A. Ertelt, C. Otieno, A. Renkl, V. Aleven, and R. J. C. M. Salden. 2013. “Metacognitive Support Promotes an Effective Use of Instructional Resources in Intelligent Tutoring.” Learning and Instruction 23 (1): 136–150. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.003
54. Stajkovic, A. D., E. A. Locke, and E. S. Blair. 2006. “A First Examination of the Relationships Between Primed Subconscious Goals, Assigned Conscious Goals, and Task Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (5): 1172–1180. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1172
55. Sutarto, A. P., M. N. A. Wahab, and N. M. Zin. 2013. “Effect of Biofeedback Training on Operator's Cognitive Performance.” Medicine and Health 44 (2): 231–243.
56. Tsianos, N., P. Germanakos, Z. Lekkas, A. Saliarou, C. Mourlas, and G. Samaras. 2010. “A Preliminary Study on Learners’ Physiological Measurements in Educational Hypermedia.” IEEE 10th international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT), Sousse, Tunisia, 61–63.
57. Underwood, G., and R. Radach. 1998. “Eye Guidance and Visual Information Processing: Reading, Visual Search, Picture Perception and Driving.” In Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception, edited by G. Underwood, 1–27. Oxford: Elsevier.
58. Valot, C. 2002. “An Ecological Approach to Metacognitive Regulation in the Adult.” In Metacognition: Process, Function and Use, edited by P. Chambres, M. Izaute, and P. Marescaux, 135–151. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
59. Van Gog, T., and H. Jarodzka. 2013. “Eye Tracking as a Tool to Study and Enhance Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes in Computer-based Learning Environments.” In International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, edited by R. Azevedo and V. Aleven, 143–156. New York: Springer Science.
60. VanLehn, K. 2011. “The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems.” Educational Psychologist 46 (4): 197–221. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
61. Zimmerman, B. J. 1994. “Dimensions of Academic Self-regulation: A Conceptual Framework for Education.” In Self-regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman, 3–21. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.