In silico risk assessment for skin sensitization using artificial neural network analysis

Journal of Toxicological Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 193-209

  Tsujita Lnoue, Kyoko ^a   Atobe, Tomomi ^a   Hirota, Morihiko ^a   Ashikaga, Takao ^a   Kouzuki, Hirokazu ^a  

^a SHISEIDO RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; In silico; LLNA; Risk assessment; Skin sensitization

Indexed keywords

COBALT CHLORIDE; DICHROMATE POTASSIUM; NICKEL SULFATE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; COMPUTER MODEL; DIPOLE; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN SENSITIZATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; ANIMAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MOUSE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALIA; MURINAE;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; MICE; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN IRRITANCY TESTS;

EID: 84924766389     PISSN: 03881350     EISSN: 18803989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2131/jts.40.193     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adler, S., Basketter, D., Creton, S., Pelkonen, O., van Benthem, J., Zuang, V., Andersen, K.E., Angers-Loustau, A., Aptula, A., Bal-Price, A., Benfenati, E., Bernauer, U., Bessems, J., Bois, F.Y., Boobis, A., Brandon, E., Bremer, S., Broschard, T., Casati, S., Coecke, S., Corvi, R., Cronin, M., Daston, G., Dekant, W., Felter, S., Gngnard, E., Gundert-Remy, U., Heinonen, T., Kimber, I., Kleinjans, J., Komulainen, H., Kreiling, R., Kreysa, J., Leite, S.B., Loizou, G., Maxwell, G., Mazzatorta, P., Munn, S., Pfuhler, S., Phrakonkham, P., Piersma, A., Poth, A., Prieto, P., Repetto, G., Rogiers, V., Schoeters, G., Schwarz, M., Serafimova, R., Tahti, H., Testa, E., van Delft, J., van Loveren, H., Vmken, M., Worth, A. and Zaldivar, J.M. (2011): Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010. Arch. Toxicol., 85, 367-485.
2. Aeby, P., Ashikaga, T., Bessou-Touya, S., Schepky, A., Gerberick, F., Kern, P., Marrec-Fairley, M., Maxwell, G., Ovigne, J.M., Sakaguchi, H., Reisinger, K., Tailhardat, M., Martinozzi-Teissier, S. and Winkler, P. (2010): Identifying and characteriz-ing chemical skin sensitizers without animal testing: Colipa’s research and method development program. Toxicol. In Vitro, 24, 1465-1473.
3. Api, A.M., Basketter, D.A., Cadby, PA., Cano, M.F., Ellis, G., Gerberick, G.F., Griem, P., McNamee, P.M., Ryan, C.A. and Safford, R. (2008): Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 52, 3-23.
4. Ashikaga, T., Yoshida, Y., Hirota, M., Yoneyama, K., Itagaki, H., Sakaguchi, H., Miyazawa, M., Ito, Y, Suzuki, H. and Toyoda, H. (2006): Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines: the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT). I. Optimization of the h-CLAT protocol. Toxicol. In Vitro, 20, 767-773.
5. Azam, P., Peiffer, J.L., Chamousset, D., Tissier, M.H., Bonnet, P.A., Vian, L., Fabre, I. and Ourlin, J.C. (2006): The cytokine-depend-ent MUTZ-3 cell line as an in vitro model for the screening of contact sensitizers. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 212, 14-23.
6. Basketter, D.A., Clapp, C, Jefferies, D., Safford, B., Ryan, C.A., Gerberick, F., Dearman, R.J. and Kimber, I. (2005): Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds. Contact Dermatitis, 53, 260-267.
7. Basketter, D.A., Evans, P., Fielder, R.J., Gerberick, G.F., Dearman, R.J. and Kimber, I. (2002): Local lymph node assay - validation, conduct and use in practice. Food Chem. Toxicol., 40, 593-598.
8. Basketter, D.A. and Kimber, I. (2011): Predictive tests for irritants and allergens and their use in quantitative risk assessment. In “Contact Dermatitis”, 5th edition, chapter 13. Springer, Berlin, Eds Johansen, J.D., Frosch, PF. and Lepoittevin, J-P, pp.229-240.
9. Basketter, D.A., Sanders, D. and Jowsey, I.R. (2007): The skin sensitization potential of resorcinol: Experience with the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis, 56, 196-200.
10. Bauch, C, Kolle, S.N., Ramirez, T., Eltze, T., Fabian, E., Mehling, A., Teubner, W, van Ravenzwaay, B., and Landsiedel, R. (2012) 1 Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 63, 489-504.
11. Emter, R., Ellis, G. and Natsch, A. (2010): Performance of a novel keratinocyte-based reporter cell line to screen skin sensitizers in vitro. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 245, 281-290.
12. Fedorowicz, A., Singh, H., Soderholm, S. and Demchuk, E. (2005): Structure-activity models for contact sensitization. Chem. Res. Toxicol, 18, 954-969.
13. Gerberick, G.F., Ryan, C.A., Kern, PS., Schlatter, H., Dearman, R.J., Kimber, I., Patlewicz, G.Y, and Basketter, D.A. (2005): Compilation of historical local lymph node data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods. Dermatitis, 16, 157-202.
14. Gerberick, G.F., Vassallo, J.D., Foertsch, L.M., Price, B.B., Chaney J.G. and Lepoittevin, J.P. (2007): Quantification of chemical peptide reactivity for screening contact allergens: a classification tree model approach. Toxicol. Sci., 97, 417-427.
15. Hirota, M., Kouzuki, H., Ashikaga, T., Sono, S., Tsujita, K, Sasa, H. and Alba, S. (2013): Artificial neural network analysis of data from multiple in vitro assays for prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals. Toxicol. In Vitro, 27, 1233-1246.
16. Jaworska, J., Harol, A., Kern, PS. and Gerberick, G.F (2011): Integrating non-animal test information into an adaptive testing strategy - skin sensitization proof of concept case. ALTEX, 28, 211-225.
17. Jaworska, J., Dancik, Y, Kern, P., Gerberick, F. and Natsch, A. (2013): Bayesian integrated testing strategy to assess skin sensitization potency: from theory to practice. J. Appl. Toxicol., 33, 1353-1364.
18. Johansson, H., Albrekt, A.S., Borrebaeck, C.A. and Lindstedt, M. (2013): The GARD assay for assessment of chemical skin sensitizers. Toxicol. In Vitro, 27, 1163-1169.
19. Jowsey, I.R., Basketter, D.A., Westmoreland, C. and Kimber, I. (2006): A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency: a proposal. J. Appl. Toxicol., 26, 341-350.
20. Kimber, I., Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, F. and Dearman, R.J. (2002): Allergic contact dermatitis. Int. Immunopharmacol., 2, 201-211.
21. Lambrechts, N., Vanheel, H., Nelissen, I., Witters, H., Van Den Heuvel, R., Van Tendeloo, V, Schoeters, G. and Hooyberghs, J. (2010): Assessment of chemical skin-sensitizing potency by an in vitro assay based on human dendritic cells. Toxicol. Sci., 116, 112-129.
22. Magnusson, B. and Kligman, A.M. (1969): The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J. Invest. Dermatol., 52, 268-276.
23. Natsch, A. and Emter, R. (2008): Skin sensitizers induce antioxidant response element dependent genes: Application to the in vitro testing of the sensitization potential of chemicals. Toxicol. Sci., 102, 110-119.
24. Natsch, A., Emter, R. and Ellis, G. (2009): Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing. Toxicol. Sci., 107, 106-121.
25. Natsch, A., Ryan, C.A., Foertsch, L., Emter, R., Jaworska, J., Gerberick, F. and Kern, P. (2013): A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation. J. Appl. Toxicol., 33, 1337-1352.
26. Nukada, Y, Miyazawa, M., Saitou, K., Sakaguchi, H. and Nishiyama, N. (2013): Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals. Toxicol. In Vitro, 27, 609-618.
27. OECD (2012): The adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization initiated by covalent binding to proteins. Part 1: Scientific evi-dence. OECD environment, health and safety publications series on testing and assessment. 168, 1-46.
28. Patlewicz, G, Aptula, A.O., Roberts, DW. and Unarte, E. (2008): A minireview of available skin sensitisation (Q)SARs/Expert sys-tems. QSAR Comb. Sci., 27, 60-76.
29. Patlewicz, G. and Worth, A. (2008): Review of data sources, QSARs and integrated testing strategies for skin sensitization. JRC Scientific and technical reports. EUR 23225 EN -2008. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/998.
30. Python, F., Goebel, C. and Aeby, P. (2007): Assessment of the U937 cell line for the detection of contact allergens. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 220, 113-124.
31. Sakaguchi, H., Ashikaga, T., Miyazawa, M., Yoshida, Y., Ito, Y, Yoneyama, K., Hirota, M., Itagaki, H., Toyoda, H. and Suzuki, H. (2006): Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines; human cell line activation test (h-CLAT). II. An inter-laboratory study of the h-CLAT. Toxicol. In Vitro, 20, 774-784.
32. Suzuki, M., Hirota, M., Hagino, S., Itagaki, H. and Aiba, S. (2009): Evaluation of changes of cell-surface thiols as a new biomark-er for in vitro sensitization test. Toxicol. In Vitro, 23, 687-696.
33. Takahashi, T., Kimura, Y, Saito, R., Nakajima, Y, Ohmiya, Y, Yamasaki, K. and Aiba, S. (2011): An in vitro test to screen skin sensitizers using a stable THP-1-derived IL-8 reporter cell line, THP-G8. Toxicol. Sci., 124, 359-369.
34. Teubner, W., Mehlmg, A., Schuster, P.X., Guth, K., Worth, A., Burton, J., van Ravenzwaay, B. and Landsiedel, R. (2013): Computer models versus reality: How well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 67, 468-485.
35. Tsujita-Inoue, K., Hirota, M., Ashikaga, T., Atobe, T., Kouzuki, H. and Aiba, S. (2014): Skin sensitization risk assessment model using artificial neural network analysis of data from multiple in vitro assays. Toxicol. In Vitro, 28, 626-639.
36. Vacanson, M., Achachi, A., Mutez, V, Cluzel-Tailhardat, M., Varlet, B.L., Rozières, A., Fournier, P. and Nicolas, J.F. (2014): Human T cell priming assay: depletion of peripheral blood lymphocytes in CD25(+) cells improves the in vitro detection of weak allergen-specific T cells. Experientia Suppl., 104, 89-100.