‘Kinect-ing’ with clinicians: A knowledge translation resource to support decision making about video game use in rehabilitation

Physical Therapy

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 426-440

  Levac, Danielle ^a   Espy, Deborah ^b   Fox, Emily ^c,d   Pradhan, Sujata ^e   Deutsch, Judith E ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d Brooks Rehabilitation   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^f RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; VIDEO GAME;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 84924274320     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130618     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Wilson PN, Foreman N, Stanton D. Virtual reality, disability and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19:213-220.
2. Laver K, George S, Thomas S, et al. Cochrane review: virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48:523-530.
3. Saposnik G, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke. 2011;42:1380-1386.
4. Mumford N, Wilson PH. Virtual reality in acquired brain injury upper limb rehabilitation: evidence-based evaluation of clinical research. Brain Inj. 2009;23:179-191.
5. Galvin J, McDonald R, Catroppa C, Anderson V. Does intervention using virtual reality improve upper limb function in children with neurological impairment: a systematic review of the evidence. Brain Inj. 2011;25:435-442.
6. Parsons TD, Rizzo AA, Rogers S, York P. Virtual reality in paediatric rehabilitation: a review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12: 224-238.
7. Sandlund M, McDonough S, Hager-Ross C. Interactive computer play in rehabilitation of children with sensorimotor disorders: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:173-179.
8. Biddiss E. Should we integrate video games into home-based rehabilitation therapies for cerebral palsy? Future Neurol. 2012;7:515-518.
9. Glegg SM, Holsti L, Velikonja D, et al. Factors influencing therapists’ adoption of virtual reality for brain injury rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16: 385-401.
10. Levac DE, Miller PA. Integrating virtual reality video games into practice: clinicians’ experiences. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013;29:504-512.
11. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research longrange plan for fiscal years 2013-2017. Fed Regist. 2013;78:20299-20311.
12. National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research. Knowledge translation. Available at: http://www.ncddr.org?knowledge_trans_over.html. Accessed December 10, 2013.
13. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. About knowledge translation and commercialization. Available at: http://www. cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html. Accessed October 9, 2013.
14. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50.
15. Zidarov D, Thomas A, Poissant L. Knowledge translation in physical therapy: from theory to practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1571-1577.
16. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Walker AE, Thomas RE. Changing physicians’ behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22:237-243.
17. Curran VR, Fleet L. A review of evaluation outcomes of Web-based continuing medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39: 561-567.
18. David I, Poissant L, Rochette A. Clinicians’ expectations of Web 2.0 as a mechanism for knowledge transfer of stroke best practices. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14:e121-e121.
19. National Stroke Foundation. National stroke audit: rehabilitation services report 2012. Melbourne, Australia. Available at: http://www.strokefoundation.com.au. Accessed October 9, 2013.
20. Fung V, Ho A, Shaffer J, et al. Use of Nintendo Wii Fit™ in the rehabilitation of outpatients following total knee replacement: a preliminary randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2012;98:183-188.
21. Demain S, Burridge J, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Assistive technologies after stroke: selfmanagement or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:334.
22. Deutsch JE, Borbely M, Filler J, et al. Use of a low-cost, commercially available gaming console (Wii) for rehabilitation of an adolescent with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2008;88:1-12.
23. Deutsch JE, Brettler A, Smith C, et al. Nintendo Wii Sports and Wii Fit game analysis, validation, and application to stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:701-719.
24. Herz NB, Mehta SH, Sethi KD, et al. Nintendo Wii rehabilitation (“Wii-hab”) provides benefits in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19: 1039-1042.
25. Mombarg R, Jelsma D, Harman E. Effect of Wii-intervention on balance of children with poor motor performance. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:2996-3003.
26. Mhatre PV, Vilares I, Stibb SM, et al. Wii Fit balance board playing improves balance and gait in Parkinson disease. PM&R. 2013;5:769-777.
27. Prosperini L, Fortuna D, Giannì C, et al. Home-based balance training using the Wii balance board: a randomized, crossover pilot study in multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:516-525.
28. Rajaratnam BS, Gui Kaien J, Lee Jilin K, et al. Does the inclusion of virtual reality games within conventional rehabilitation enhance balance retraining after a recent episode of stroke? Rehabil Res Pract. 2013;2013:649561.
29. Conyers JK, Malkin MJ, Yang H. An exploratory study on the effects of Nintendo Wii® Fit balance board on balance retraining and body mass index of adolescents with a traumatic brain injury. Am J Recreation Ther. 2011;10:38-48.
30. Heick JD, Flewelling S, Blau R, et al. Wii Fit and balance: does the Wii Fit improve balance in community-dwelling older adults? Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2012;28:217-222.
31. Jorgensen MG, Laessoe U, Hendriksen C, et al. Efficacy of Nintendo Wii training on mechanical leg muscle function and postural balance in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68:845-852.
32. Sparker-Griffin C. Wii-habilitation: using Wii as an effective intervention tool for seniors. OT Practice. 2013;18:18-19.
33. Baltaci G, Harput G, Haksever B, et al. Comparison between Nintendo Wii Fit and conventional rehabilitation on functional performance outcomes after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;21:880-887.
34. Sims J, Cosby N, Saliba EN, et al. Exergaming and static postural control in individuals with a history of lower limb injury. J Athl Train. 2013;48:314-325.
35. Sin H, Lee G. Additional virtual reality training using Xbox Kinect in stroke survivors with hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:871-880.
36. Gutiérrez RO, Gálan Del Rio F, Cano de la Cuerda R, et al. A telerehabilitation program by virtual reality video games improves balance and postural control in multiple sclerosis patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33:545-554.
37. Luna-Oliva L, Ortiz-Gutiérrez RM, Cano-de la Cuerda R, et al. Kinect Xbox 360 as a therapeutic modality for children with cerebral palsy in a school environment: a preliminary study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33:513-521.
38. Ilg W, Schatton C, Schicks J, et al. Video game-based coordinative training improves ataxia in children with degenerative ataxia. Neurology. 2012;79:2056-2060.
39. Vernadakis N, Derri V, Tsitskari E, Antoniou P. The effect of Xbox Kinect intervention on balance ability for previous injured young competitive male athletes: a preliminary study. Phys Ther Sports. 2014;15:148-155.
40. Laver K, George S, Ratcliffe J, Crotty M. Virtual reality stroke rehabilitation: hype or hope? Aust Occup Ther J. 2011; 58:215-219.
41. Levac DE, Galvin J. When is virtual reality “therapy”? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94:795-798.
42. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Introduction: knowledge translation—what it is and what it isn’t. In: Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID, eds. Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving From Evidence to Practice. 2nd ed. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013.
43. Sudsawad P. Knowledge Translation: Introduction to Models, Strategies, and Measures. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research; 2007.
44. Rubin J, Chasnell D. Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing Inc; 2008.
45. Levac DE, Galvin J. Facilitating clinical decision-making about the use of virtual reality within paediatric motor rehabilitation: application of a classification framework. Dev NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;14:177-184.
46. Galvin J, Levac DE. Facilitating clinical decision-making about the use of virtual reality within paediatric motor rehabilitation: describing and classifying virtual reality systems. Dev NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;14:112-122.
47. Rademaker M, Fox EJ, Lange B, et al. Made for rehab: feasibility and effect of a clinician-adapted video game using the Kinect™ on balance and falls in a woman with parkinsonism. Poster presented at: Combined Sections Meeting of the American Physical Therapy Association; January 21-24, 2013; San Diego, California.
48. Pradhan SD, Mortiz C. The use of a gaming device for a multimodal exercise intervention in individuals with Parkinson disease. Poster presented at: Combined Sections Meeting of the American Physical Therapy Association; January 21-24, 2013; San Diego, California.
49. Espy D, Reinthal A, Dal Bello-Haas V. A systematic framework to guide clinical decision-making in gaming choices for therapeutic use. Poster presented at: Combined Sections Meeting of the American Physical Therapy Association; January 21-24, 2013: San Diego, California.
50. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2011.
51. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8:187-211.
52. Imam B, Jarus T. Virtual reality rehabilitation from social cognitive and motor learning theoretical perspectives in stroke population. Rehabil Res Pract. 2014;2014: 594540.
53. Pollock A, Baer G, Langhorne P, Pomeroy V. Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:395-410.
54. Zelaznik H. The past and future of motor learning and control: what is the proper level of description and analysis? Kin Rev. 2014;3:38-43.
55. Snodgrass SJ, Heneghan NR, Tsao H, et al. Recognising neuroplasticity in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a basis for greater collaboration between musculoskeletal and neurological physiotherapists. Man Ther. 2014;19:614-617.
56. Sullivan KJ, Kantak SS, Burtner PA. Motor learning in children: feedback effects on skill acquisition. Phys Ther. 2008;88: 720-732.
57. Cai L, Chan JSY, Yan JH, Peng K. Brain plasticity and motor practice in cognitive aging. Frontiers Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:1-12.
58. Carr JH, Shepard R, eds. Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation. Gaithersberg, MD: Aspen Pubishers Inc; 2000.
59. Gentile AM. Skill acquisition: action, movement, and neuromotor processes. In: Carr JH, Shepard R, eds. Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation. Gaithersberg, MD: Aspen Publishers Inc; 2000.
60. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
61. Winstein CJ. Knowledge of results and motor learning: implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1991;71:140-149.
62. Levin MF. Can virtual reality offer enriched environments for rehabilitation? Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11:153-155.
63. Lohse K, Shirzad N, Verster A, et al. Video games and rehabilitation: using design principles to enhance engagement in physical therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013;37:166-175.
64. dos Santos Mendes FA, Pompeu JE, Modenesi Lobo A, et al. Motor learning, retention and transfer after virtual-reality-based training in Parkinson’s disease—effect of motor and cognitive demands of games: a longitudinal, controlled clinical study. Physiotherapy. 2012;98:217-223.
65. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor Learning and Performance. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2000.
66. Jurado MB, Rosselli M. The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of our current understanding. Neuropsychol Rev. 2007;17:213-233.
67. Hix D, Gabbard JL. Usability engineering of virtual environments. In: Stanney K, ed. Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002:681-699.
68. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2002.
69. Sullivan P. Multiple methods and the usability of interface prototypes: the complementarity of laboratory and focus groups. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Systems Documentation; New York, NY; 1991. 1991:106-118.
70. Levac D, Glegg S, Camden C, et al. Best practice guidelines for the development, implementation, and evaluation of online knowledge translation resources in rehabilitation. Phys Ther. doi: 10.2522/ptj. 20130500.
71. Mathur S, Stanton S, Reid WD. Canadian physical therapists’ interest in Web-based and computer-assisted continuing education. Phys Ther. 2005;85:226-237.
72. Stockley D, Beyer W, Hutchinson N, et al. Using interactive technology to disseminate research findings to a diverse population. Can J Learning Technol. 2009; 35:1.
73. MacDonald CJ, Stodel EJ, Farres LJ, et al. The demand-driven learning model: a framework for Web-based learning. Internet Higher Ed. 2001;4:9-30.
74. Dieleman C, Duncan EAS. Investigating the purpose of an online discussion group for health professionals: a case example from forensic occupational therapy. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:253.
75. Hoffmann T, Desha L, Verrall K. Evaluating an online occupational therapy community of practice and its role in supporting occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58:337-345.
76. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277-1288.