Factors influencing therapists' adoption of virtual reality for brain injury rehabilitation

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 385-401

  Glegg, Stephanie M N ^a,b   Holsti, Liisa ^b   Velikonja, Diana ^c   Ansley, Barbara ^d   Brum, Christine ^d   Sartor, Denise ^d  

^a BC CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BRAIN INJURIES; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; VALIDATION STUDY; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BRAIN INJURIES; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84878504240     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2013.1506     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Weiss PL, Rand D, Katz N, et al. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. Journal of NeuroEngineering & Rehabilitation 2004; 1:12-23.
2. Sveistrup, H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. Journal of NeuroEngineering & Rehabilitation 2004; 1:10-17.
3. Galvin J, Levac D. Facilitating clinical decision-making about the use of virtual reality within paediatric motor rehabilitation: describing and classifying virtual reality systems. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2011; 14:112-22.
4. Sveistrup H, Thornton M, Bryanton C, et al. (2004) Outcomes of intervention programs using flatscreen virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. San Francisco, CA: IEEE.
5. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2005; 8:187-211.
6. Thornton M, Marshall S, McComas J, et al. Benefits of activity and virtual reality based balance exercise programmes for adults with traumatic brain injury: perceptions of participants and their caregivers. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 989-1000.
7. Johnson DA, Rose FD, Rushton S, et al. Virtual reality: a new prosthesis for brain injury rehabilitation. Scotland Medical Journal 1998; 43:81-3.
8. Kim JH, Jang SH, Kim CS, et al. Use of virtual reality to enhance balance and ambulation in chronic stroke: a doubleblind, randomized controlled study. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2009; 88:693-701.
9. Weiss PL, Sveistrup H, Rand D, et al. Video capture virtual reality: a decade of rehabilitation assessment and intervention. Physical Therapy Reviews 2009; 14:307-21.
10. Bayley M, Teasell R, Marshall S, et al. (2007) ABIKUS evidence based recommendations for rehabilitation of moderate to severe acquired brain injury. ABIKUS Guideline Development Group, Toronto, ON.
11. Bart O, Agam T, Weiss PL, et al. Using video-capture virtual reality for children with acquired brain injury. Disability & Rehabilitation 2011; 33:1579-86.
12. Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, et al. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2005; 86:2218-23.
13. Kim YM, Chun MH, Yun GJ, et al. The effect of virtual reality training on unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2011; 35:309-15.
14. Rand D, Katz N, Weiss PL. Evaluation of virtual shopping in the VMall: comparison of post-stroke participants to healthy control groups. Disability & Rehabilitation 2007; 29:1710-19.
15. You SH, Jang SH, Kim YH, et al. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke 2005; 36:1166-71.
16. Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Dean SG. Theory development and a science of rehabilitation. Disability & Rehabilitation 2005; 27:1493-501.
17. Whyte J. A grand unified theory of rehabilitation (we wish!). The 57th John Stanley Coulter memorial lecture. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2007; 89:203-9.
18. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995; 6:144-76.
19. Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 1991; 50:179-211.
20. Chau PYK, Hu PJ. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decision Sciences 2001; 32:699-719.
21. Jackson C, Smith RA, Conner M. Applying an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to physical activity. Journal of Sports Sciences 2003; 21:119-33.
22. Hsu M, Chiu C. Predicting electronic service continuance with a Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology 2004; 23:359-73.
23. Lin H. Understanding behavioral intention to participate in virtual communities. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2006; 9:540-7.
24. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1989; 13:319-40.
25. Shiue Y. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers' instructional technology use through the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2007; 36:425-53.
26. Rogers EM. (1983) Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
27. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 1977; 84:191-215.
28. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research 1991; 2:173-91.
29. Choudrie J, Dwivedi YK. Investigating factors influencing adoption of broadband in the household. Journal of Computer Information Systems 2006; 46:25-34.
30. Zhang W, Gutierrez O. Information technology acceptance in the social services sector context: an exploration. Social Work 2007; 52:221-31.
31. Annema J, Verstraete M, Abeele V, et al. Videogames in therapy: a therapist's perspective. Fun and Games 2010; 94-8.
32. Bertrand M, Bouchard S. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. Journal of CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation 2008; 1:200-10.
33. Di Loreto I, Van Dokkum L, Gouaich A. et al. (2011) Mixed reality as a means to strengthen post-stroke rehabilitation. In Proceedings from the 4th International Conference on Virtual and Mixed Reality. Orlando, FL: Springer Verlag.
34. Hanif M, Niaz H, Khan MA. (2011) Investigating the possible role and usefulness of video capture virtual reality in motor impairment rehabilitation. Proceedings from the 2nd International Conference on Next Generation Information Technology (ICNIT). Gyeongju City, Korea: IEEE.
35. Kramer TL, Pyne JM, Kimbrell TA, et al. Clinician perceptions of virtual reality to assess and treat returning veterans. Psychiatric Services 2010; 61:1153-6.
36. Lotan M, Yalon-Chamovitz S, Weiss PL. Training caregivers to provide virtual reality intervention for adults with severe intellectual and developmental disability. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 2011; 25:15-19.
37. Markus LA, Willems KE, Maruna CC, et al. Virtual reality: feasibility of implementation in a regional burn center. Burns 2009; 35:967-9.
38. Portney LG, Watkins MP. (2000) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
39. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. Preston CC, Colman AM. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica 2000; 104:1-15.
41. Wildt AR, Mazis MB. Determinants of scale response: label versus position. Journal of Marketing Research 1978; 15: 261-7.
42. Moore GC, Bensabat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 1991; 2:192-222.
43. Shoham S, Gonen A. Intentions of hospital nurses to work with computers based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2008; 26:106-16.
44. Cervone D, Scott WD. (1995) Self-efficacy theory of behavioral change: foundations, conceptual issues, and therapeutic implications. In O'Donohue WT, Krasner L, eds. Theories of behavior therapy: exploring behavior change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 349-83.
45. Taylor S, Todd PA. Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1995; 19:561-70.
46. Borgatti SP, Carboni I. On measuring individual knowledge in organizations. Organizational Research Methods 2007; 10:449-62.
47. Casper ES. The Theory of Planned Behavior applied to continuing education for mental health professionals. Psychiatric Services 2007; 58:1324-9.
48. Jimmieson NL, Peach M, White KM. Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to inform change management. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2008;44:237-62. doi:10. 1177/0021886307312773
49. Ajzen I, Madden TJ. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intention and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1986; 22:453-74. doi:10. 1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4