Clinicians′ expectations of web 2.0 as a mechanism for knowledge transfer of stroke best practices

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  David, Isabelle ^a   Poissant, Lise ^a,b   Rochette, Annie ^b,c  

^a Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c Centre de Readaptation Lucie Bruneau   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evidence based practice; Health personnel; Information dissemination; Internet; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL MEDIA;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE BASES; MIDDLE AGED; QUEBEC; SOCIAL MEDIA; STROKE;

EID: 84872454038     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2016     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health 2007;28:413-433. [doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145] [Medline: 17150029].
2. Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire W, Blidner I. Building interorganizational knowledge for evidence-based health system change. Health Care Manage Rev 2002;27(3):48-59. [Medline: 12146783].
3. Salbach NM, Jaglal SB, Korner-Bitensky N, Rappolt S, Davis D. Practitioner and organizational barriers to evidence-based practice of physical therapists for people with stroke. Phys Ther 2007 Oct;87(10):1284-1303 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070040] [Medline: 17684088].
4. Salbach NM, Guilcher SJ, Jaglal SB, Davis DA. Determinants of research use in clinical decision making among physical therapists providing services post-stroke: a cross-sectional study. Implement Sci 2010;5:77 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-77] [Medline: 20946678].
5. Dumoulin C, Korner-Bitensky N, Tannenbaum C. Urinary incontinence after stroke: identification, assessment, and intervention by rehabilitation professionals in Canada. Stroke 2007 Oct;38(10):2745-2751 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.486035] [Medline: 17823380].
6. Korner-Bitensky N, Desrosiers J, Rochette A. A national survey of occupational therapists' practices related to participation post-stroke. J Rehabil Med 2008 Apr;40(4):291-297 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2340/16501977-0167] [Medline: 18382825].
7. Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Desrosiers J. Actual vs best practice for families post-stroke according to three rehabilitation disciplines. J Rehabil Med 2007 Sep;39(7):513-519 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2340/16501977-0082] [Medline: 17724549].
8. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004 Feb;8(6):iii-iv, 1 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 14960256].
9. World Stroke Organization Stroke Guideline Sub-Committee. Stroke Society of Australasia. 2009 Jun. Clinical Practice Guideline Development Handbook for Stroke Care URL: http://www.strokesociety.com.au/index.php?option=com- docman&task=doc-download&gid=185&Itemid=196 [accessed 2011-11-07] [WebCite Cache].
10. Canadian Stroke Strategy. Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care (update 2010). 2010. URL: http://www.hsf.sk.ca/siss/documents/2010- BP-ENG.pdf [accessed 2011-11-07] [WebCite Cache ID 6ASpUqQxI].
11. Poissant L, Ahmed S, Riopelle RJ, Rochette A, Lefebvre H, Radcliffe-Branch D. Synergizing expectation and execution for stroke communities of practice innovations. Implement Sci 2010;5:44 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-44] [Medline: 20529305].
12. Canadian Stroke Network. 2010. Stroke Engine URL: http://strokengine.ca/ [accessed 2011-11-20] [WebCite Cache ID 63LFYyt8Q].
13. Teasell R. EBRSR: Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation. 2011. URL: http://www.ebrsr.com/[accessed 2011-11-07] [WebCite Cache ID 6ASpbO7DW].
14. Doney L, Barlow H, West J. Use of libraries and electronic information resources by primary care staff: outcomes from a survey. Health Info Libr J 2005 Sep;22(3):182-188. [doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2005.00561.x] [Medline: 16109146].
15. Glasgow RE, Goldstein MG, Ockene JK, Pronk NP. Translating what we have learned into practice. Principles and hypotheses for interventions addressing multiple behaviors in primary care. Am J Prev Med 2004 Aug;27(2 Suppl):88-101. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.019] [Medline: 15275677].
16. Van De Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Berben SA, Schoonhoven L. Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(2):e18 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1350] [Medline: 20542857].
17. Mathieu J. Blogs, podcasts, and wikis: the new names in information dissemination. J Am Diet Assoc 2007 Apr;107(4):553-555. [doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.02.027] [Medline: 17383254].
18. Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:41 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-41] [Medline: 16911779].
19. McLean R, Richards BH, Wardman JI. The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: Darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution? Med J Aust 2007 Aug 6;187(3):174-177. [Medline: 17680746].
20. Rethlefsen ML, Rothman DL, Mojon DS. Internet Cool Tools for Physicians. Berlin: Springer; 2009.
21. Nagy P, Kahn CE, Boonn W, Siddiqui K, Meenan C, Knight N, et al. Building virtual communities of practice. J Am Coll Radiol 2006 Sep;3(9):716-720. [doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.06.005] [Medline: 17412156].
22. Curran JA, Murphy AL, Abidi SS, Sinclair D, McGrath PJ. Bridging the gap: knowledge seeking and sharing in a virtual community of emergency practice. Eval Health Prof 2009 Sep;32(3):312-325. [doi: 10.1177/0163278709338570] [Medline: 19696084].
23. Giorgi A. De la méthode phénoménologique utilisée comme mode de recherche qualitative en sciences humaines: théorie, pratique et évaluation. In: Poupart J, Deslauriers JP, Groulx LH, Laperrière A, Mayer R, Pires AP, editors. La recherche qualitative. Montréal: Gaëtan Morin; 1997:113-169.
24. Davis FD. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1986.
25. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989;35(8):982-1003. [doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982].
26. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010 Feb;43(1):159-172. [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002] [Medline: 19615467].
27. Rawstorne P, Jayasuriya R, Caputi P. Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior when usage is mandatory. 2000 Presented at: Proceedings of the twenty first international conference on Information systems; 2000; Brisbane p. 35-44.
28. Tung FC, Chang SC, Chou CM. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. Int J Med Inform 2008 May;77(5):324-335. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.06.006] [Medline: 17644029].
29. Van Schaik P, Bettany-Saltikov JA, Warren JG. Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment. In: Behaviour & Information Technology. Abingdon, Oxford: Taylor and Francis; 2002:47-57.
30. Schaper LK, Pervan GP. ICT and OTs: a model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. Int J Med Inform 2007 Jun;76 Suppl 1:S212-S221. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006. 05.028] [Medline: 16828335].
31. Oborn E, Barrett M, Racko G. Cambridge Judge Business School. 2010 May. Knowledge Translation in Healthcare: A Review of the Literature (Working Paper Series) URL: http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/research/working-papers/2010/wp1005.pdf [accessed 2011-11-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6ASsfF2Mi].
32. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26(1):13-24. [doi: 10.1002/chp.47] [Medline: 16557505].
33. Tetroe J. Knowledge Translation at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research: A Primer. Focus: Technical brief 2007;18:1-8 [FREE Full text] [WebCite Cache].
34. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(3):e22 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1030] [Medline: 18725354].
35. Nonaka I, Reinmoeller P, Senoo D. Integrated IT systems to capitalize on market knowledge. In: von Krogh G, editor. Knowledge Creation: A Source of Value. New York: Palgrave; 2000:36-60.
36. Spallek H, Butler BS, Schleyer TK, Weiss PM, Wang X, Thyvalikakath TP, et al. Supporting emerging disciplines with e-communities: needs and benefits. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(2):e19 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.971] [Medline: 18653443].
37. Younger P. Internet-based information-seeking behaviour amongst doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature. Health Info Libr J 2010 Mar;27(1):2-10. [doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00883.x] [Medline: 20402799].
38. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev 2007 Dec;64(6):650-672. [doi: 10.1177/ 1077558707305942] [Medline: 17717378].
39. Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2002.
40. Kloda LA, Bartlett JC. Clinical information behavior of rehabilitation therapists: a review of the research on occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists. J Med Libr Assoc 2009 Jul;97(3):194-202. [doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.008] [Medline: 19626145].
41. Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon 2001;9(5):1-6.
42. Chiang I, Huang C. Characterizing Web users' degree of Web 2.0-ness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009;60(7):1349-1357. [doi: 10.1002/asi.21058].
43. Paré G, Sicotte C, Poba-Nzaou P, Balouzakis G. Clinicians' perceptions of organizational readiness for change in the context of clinical information system projects: insights from two cross-sectional surveys. Implement Sci 2011;6:15 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-15] [Medline: 21356080].
44. Statistics Canada. Census of Population. 2006 URL: http://www12.statcan. gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/index-eng.cfm [accessed 2011-11-20] [WebCite Cache ID 1321813382531795].
45. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. L'architecture des services de santé et des services sociaux: Les programmes-services et les programmes-soutien. 2004 Jan. URL: http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/2004/04-710-01.pdf [accessed 2012-09-05] [WebCite Cache ID 6AStilCjf].
46. Karsh BT, Escoto KH, Beasley JW, Holden RJ. Toward a theoretical approach to medical error reporting system research and design. Appl Ergon 2006 May;37(3):283-295. [doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.003] [Medline: 16182233].
47. Lau AS. Hospital-based nurses' perceptions of the adoption of Web 2.0 tools for knowledge sharing, learning, social interaction and the production of collective intelligence. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e92 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1398] [Medline: 22079851].
48. Paré G, Sicotte C, Jacques H. The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians' acceptance of clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13(2):197-205 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1930] [Medline: 16357351].
49. Alquraini H, Alhashem AM, Shah MA, Chowdhury RI. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals. J Adv Nurs 2007 Feb;57(4):375-381. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648. 2007.04113.x] [Medline: 17291201].
50. Nordqvist C, Hanberger L, Timpka T, Nordfeldt S. Health professionals' attitudes towards using a Web 2.0 portal for child and adolescent diabetes care: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(2):e12 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1152] [Medline: 19403464].