Prebiotic and diet/light chocolate dairy dessert: Chemical composition, sensory profiling and relationship with consumer expectation

LWT

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 424-430

  de Morais, Elisa Carvalho ^a   Lima, Glaucia Carielo ^a   de Morais, Augusto Ramalho ^b   André Bolini, Helena Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dairy desserts; Partial least squares regression; Prebiotics; Principal component analysis; Quantitative descriptive analysis

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DAIRIES; DAIRY PRODUCTS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS; DAIRY DESSERTS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PREBIOTICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS (QDA);

SENSORY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84924218980     PISSN: 00236438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. A.O.A.C.- Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official methods of analysis of A.O.A.C. International: Ice Cream and Frozen Desserts 2011, 4. rev. 18th ed.
2. Adhikari K., Dooley L.M., Chambers E., Blumiratana N. Sensory characteristics of commercial lactose-free milks manufactured in the United States. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2010, 43(1):113-118.
3. Arcia P.L., Costell E., Tárrega A. Thickness suitability of prebiotic dairy desserts: relationship with rheological properties. Food Research International 2010, 64:65-73.
4. Ares G., Barreiro C., Deliza R., Gimenez A., Gambaro A. Consumer expectations and perception of chocolate milk desserts enriched with antioxidant. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:243-260.
5. Aryana K.J., McGrew P. Quality attributes of yogurt with Lactobacillus casei and various prebiotics. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2007, 40(10):1808-1814.
6. Bolini-Cardello H.M.A., Silva M.A.A.P., Damásio M.H. Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 1999, 54:119-130.
7. Brasil.Ministério da Saúde Secretaria de Vigilância Sanitária Portaria SVS n° 27 de 13 de janeiro de 1998. Regulamento técnico referente à informação nutricional complementar 16 jan. 1998, Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF.
8. Brito C.A.K., Bolini H.M.A. Sensory profile of sweeteners in guava nectar. Alimentos e Nutrição (UNESP. Marília) 2010, 20:561-572.
9. Cadena R.S., Bolini H.M.A. Time-intensity analysis and acceptance test for traditional and light vanilla ice cream. Food Research International 2011, 44:677-683.
10. Cadena R.S., Cruz A.G., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. Reduced fat and sugar vanilla ice creams: sensory profiling and external preference mapping. Journal of Dairy Science 2012, 5:4842-4850.
11. Cadena R.S., Cruz A.G., Netto R.R., Castro W.F., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. Sensory profile and physicochemical characteristics of mango nectar sweetened with high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time. Food Research International 2013, 54:1670-1679.
12. Carakostas M., Prakash A., Kinghorn D., Wu C.D., Soerjato D.D. Steviol glycosides. Alternative sweeteners 2012, 159-180. CRC Press, London, UK. 4th ed. L.O.B. Nabors (Ed.).
13. Cardarelli H.R., Aragon-Alegro L.C., Alegro J.H.A., Castro I.A., Saad S.M.I. Effect of inulin and Lactobacillus paracasei on sensory and instrumental texture properties of functional chocolate mousse. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2008, 88:1318-1324.
14. Castro F.P., Cunha T.M., Ogliari P.J., Teófilo R.F., Ferreira M.M.C., Prudêncio E.S. Influence of different content of cheese whey and oligofructose on the properties of fermented lactic beverages: study using response surface methodology. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2008, 42(5):993-997.
15. Chollet M., Gille D., Schmid A., Walther B., Piccinali P. Acceptance of sugar reduction in flavored yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 2013, 96(9):5501-5511.
16. Choque-Delgado G.T., Tamashiro W.M.S.C., Maróstica-Júnior M.R., Moreno Y.M.F., Pastore G.M. The putative effects of prebiotics as immunomodulatory agents. Food Research International 2011, 43:1231-1236.
17. Cruz A.G., Cadena R.S., Alvaro M.B.V.B., Sant'Ana A.S., Oliveira C.A.F., Faria J.A.F., et al. Assessing the use of different chemometric techniques to discriminate low-fat and full-fat yogurts. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2013, 50(1):210-214.
18. Damásio M.H., Costell E. Análisis sensorial descriptivo: generación de descriptors y selección de catadores. Revista Agroquímica de Tecnologia de Alimentos 1991, 31:165-178.
19. De Marchi R., McDaniel M., Bolini H.M.A. Formulating a new passion fruit juice beverage with different sweetener systems. Journal of Sensory Studies 2009, 24:698-711.
20. De Melo L.L.M.M., Bolini H.M.A., Efraim P. Sensory profile, acceptability, and their relationship for diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:138-143.
21. Gonzalez N.J., Adhikari K., Sancho-Madriz M.F. Sensory characteristics of peach-flavored yogurt drinks containing prebiotics and synbiotics. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2011, 44(1):158-163.
22. Granato D., Ribeiro J.C.B., Castro I.A., Masson M.L. Sensory evaluation and physicochemical optimisation of soy-based desserts using response surface methodology. Food Chemistry 2010, 121(3):899-906.
23. Grotz V.L., Molinary S., Peterson R.C., Quinlan M.E., Reo R. Sucralose. Alternative sweeteners 2012, 133-150. CRC Press, London, UK. 4th ed. L.O.B. Nabors (Ed.).
24. Harwood M.L., Ziegler G.R., Hayes J.E. Tolerance for high flavanol cocoa powder in semisweet chocolate. Nutrients 2013, 5(6):2258-2267.
25. IAL - Instituto Adolfo Lutz Normas analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz: Métodos químicos e físicos para análise de alimentos 1985, São Paulo.
26. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices 2010, Springer, London. 2nd ed.
27. MacFie H.J., Bratchell N., Greenhoff K., Vallis L.V. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effect in halls tests. Journal of Sensory Studies 1989, 4:129-148.
28. Mayhew D.A., Meyers B.I., Stargel W.W., Comer C.P., Andress S.E., Butchko H.H. Neotame. Alternative sweeteners 2012, 133-150. CRC Press, London, UK. 4th ed. L.O.B. Nabors (Ed.).
29. Mendoza E., García M.L., Casas C., Selgas M.D. Inulin as fat substitute in low fat, dry fermented sausages. Meat Science 2001, 57(4):387-393.
30. Morais E.C., Cruz A.G., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. Prebiotic gluten-free bread: sensory profiling and drivers of liking. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2014, 55:248-254.
31. Morais E.C., Morais A.R., Cruz A.G., Bolini H.M.A. Development of chocolate dairy dessert with addition of prebiotics and replacement of sucrose with different high-intensity sweeteners. Journal of Dairy Science 2014, 97:2600-2609.
32. Morais E.C., Pinheiro A.C.M., Nunes C.A., Bolini H.M.A. Multiple time-intensity analysis and temporal dominance of sensations of chocolate dairy dessert using prebiotic and different high-intensity sweeteners. Journal of Sensory Studies 2014, 29:339-350.
33. Moskowitz H.R. Product testing and sensory evaluation of foods: Marketing and R&D approaches 1983, Food and Nutrition Press, Westport.
34. Palazzo A.B., Bolini H.M.A. Multiple time-intensity analysis: sweetness, bitterness, chocolate flavor and melting rate of chocolate with sucralose, rebaudioside and neotame. Journal of Sensory Studies 2014, 29:21-32.
35. Pimentel T.C., Cruz A.G., Prudencio S.H. Short communication: Influence of long-chain inulin and Lactobacillus paracasei subspecies paracasei on the sensory profile and acceptance of a traditional yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 2013, 96(10):6233-6241.
36. Pinheiro A.C.M., Nunes C.A., Vietoris V. SensoMaker: a tool for sensorial characterization of food products. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2013, 37:199-201.
37. Roberfroid M.B., Gibson G.R., Hoyles L., McCartney A.L., Rastall R., Rowland I., et al. Prebiotics effects: metabolic and health benefits. British Journal of Nutrition 2010, 104(2):1-63.
38. Santos B.A., Pollonio M.A.R., Cruz A.G., Messias V.C., Monteiro R.A., Oliveira T.L.C., et al. Ultra-flash profile and projective mapping for describing sensory attributes of prebiotic mortadellas. Food Research International 2013, 54(2):1705-1711.
39. SAS Institute SAS user's guide: Statistics version 9.1.2 2008, Sas Institute Inc, Cary (NC).
40. Scheid M.M.A., Moreno Y.M.F., Maróstica-Júnior M.R., Pastore G.M. Effect of prebiotics on the health of the elderly. Food Research International 2013, 53:426-432.
41. Stone H., Bleibaum R.N., Thomas H.A. Sensory evaluation practices 2012, 438. Academic Press, New York. 4th ed.
42. Volpini-Rapina L.F., Sokei F.R., Conti-Silva A.C. Sensory profile and preference mapping of orange cakes with addition of prebiotics inulin and oligofructose. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2012, 48(1):37-42.
43. Walkeling I.N., MacFie J.H. Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of κ samples from τ may be tested. Food Quality and Preference 1995, 6:299-308.
44. Wang Y. Prebiotics: present and future in food science and technology. Food Research International 2009, 42(1):8-12.