Consumer expectations and perception of chocolate milk desserts enriched with antioxidants

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 25, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages 243-260

  Ares, Gastón ^a   Barreiro, Cecilia ^a   Deliza, Rosires ^b,c   Giménez, Ana ^a   Gámbaro, Adriana ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c CENTRE DES SCIENCES DU GOÛT ET DE L ALIMENTATION   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS; CONSUMER SEGMENTS; PRODUCT PERCEPTION; WORD ASSOCIATION;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

MOTIVATION;

THEOBROMA CACAO;

EID: 78149246270     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00293.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. AARON, J.I., MELA, D.J. and EVANS, R.E. 1994. The influence of attitudes, beliefs and label information on perceptions of reduced-fat spread. Appetite 22, 25-37.
2. ARES, G., GIMÉNEZ, A. and GÁMBARO, A. 2008a. Understanding consumers' perception of conventional and functional yogurts using word association and hard laddering. Food Qual. Pref. 19, 636-646.
3. ARES, G., GIMÉNEZ, A. and GÁMBARO, A. 2008b. Does information about the source of functional ingredients influence consumer perception of functional milk desserts? J. Sci. Food Agric. 88, 2061-2068.
4. ARES, G., GIMÉNEZ, A. and GÁMBARO, A. 2008c. Uruguayan consumers' perception of functional foods. J. Sensory Studies 23, 614-630.
5. ARES, G., BAIXAULI, R., SANZ, T., VARELA, P. and SALVADOR, A. 2009a. New functional fibre in milk puddings: Effect on sensory properties and consumers' acceptability. Food Sci. Technol. 42, 710-716.
6. ARES, G., BARREIRO, C., DELIZA, R., GIMÉNEZ, A. and GÁMBARO, A. 2009b. Alternatives to reduce the bitterness, astringency and characteristic flavour of antioxidant extracts. Food Res. Int. 42, 871-878.
7. ARES, G., GIMÉNEZ, A. and DELIZA, R. 2010. Influence of three nonsensory factors on consumer choice of functional yogurts over regular ones. Food Qual. Pref. 21, 361-367.
8. BRAVO, L., GOYA, L. and LECUMBERRI, E. 2007. LC/MS characterization of phenolic constituents of mate (Ilex paraguariensis, St. Hill) and its antioxidant activity compared to commonly consumed beverages. Food Res. Int. 40, 393-405.
9. CARDELLO, A.V. 1994. Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance. In Measurement of Food Preferences (H.J.H. MacFie and D.M.H. Thomson eds.) pp. 253-297, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK.
10. CARDELLO, A.V. and SAWYER, F.M. 1992. Effects of disconfirmed consumer expectations on food acceptability. J. Sensory Studies 7, 253-277.
11. CHILDS, N.M. and PORYZEES, G.H. 1998. Foods that help prevent disease: Consumer attitudes and public policy implications. Br Food J 9, 419, 426.
12. DE OLIVEIRA, S.Q., DAL-PIZZOL, F., GOSMANN, G., GUILLAUME, D., MOREIRA, J.C.F. and SCHENKEL, E.P. 2003. Antioxidant activity of Baccharis articulata extracts: Isolation of a new compound with antioxidant activity. Free Radic. Res. 37, 555-559.
13. DELIZA, R. and MACFIE, H.J.H. 1996. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. J. Sensory Studies 11, 103-128.
14. DESMARCHELIER, C., COUSSIO, J. and CICCIA, G. 1998. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging effects in extracts of the medicinal herb Achyrocline satureioides (Lam.) DC ("Marcela"). Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 31, 1163-1170.
15. GILBERT, L. 2000. The functional food trend: What's next and what Americans think about eggs. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 19, 507S-512S.
16. HUSSON, F., JOSSE, J., LÊ, S. and MAZET, J. 2007. FactoMineR: Factor Analysis and Data Mining with R. R package version 1.04. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FactoMineR/index.html (accessed November 13, 2009).
17. ISO 1988. Sensory Analysis: General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms, ISO 8589, International Organization for Standardization, Geneve, Switzerland.
18. KÄHKÖNEN, P. and TUORILA, H. 1998. Effect of reduced-fat information on expected and actual hedonic and sensory ratings of sausage. Appetite 30, 13-23.
19. KRYSTALLIS, A., MAGLARAS, G. and MAMALIS, S. 2008. Motivations and cognitive structures of consumers in their purchasing of functional foods. Food Qual. Pref. 19, 525-538.
20. LÄHTEENMÄKI, L. 2003. Consumers and functional foods. In Functional Dairy Products (T. Mattila-Sandholm and M. Saarela, eds.) Woodhead Publication Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
21. LÊ, S., JOSSE, J. and HUSSON, F. 2008. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Software 25(1).
22. LESSCHAEVE, I. and NOBLE, A.C. 2005. Polyphenols: Factors influencing their sensory properties and their effects on food and beverages preferences. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 81, 330S-335S.
23. MACFIE, H.J.H., BRATCHELL, N., GREENHOFF, K. and VALLIS, L.V. 1989. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sensory Studies 4, 129-148.
24. MENRAD, K. 2003. Market and marketing of functional food in Europe. J. Food Eng. 56, 181-188.
25. OLSON, J.C. and DOVER, P.A. 1979. Disconfirmation of consumer expectations through product trial. J Appl. Psychol. 64(2), 179-189.
26. POULSEN, J.B. 1999. Danish consumers' attitudes towards functional foods. Working Paper No. 62, MAPP, Århus, Denmark.
27. R Development Core Team. 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
28. SINGLETON, V.L., JOSEPH, A. and ROSSI, J. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolibdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16, 144.
29. SIRÓ, I., KÁPOLNA, E., KÁPOLNA, B. and LUGASI, S. 2008. Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance - A review. Appetite 51, 456-467.
30. TUORILA, H. and CARDELLO, A.V. 2002. Consumer responses to an off-flavor in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Qual. Pref. 13, 561-569.
31. TUORILA, H., CARDELLO, A.V. and LESHER, L.L. 1994. Antecedents and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods. Appetite 23, 247-263.
32. URALA, N. and LÄHTEENMÄKI, L. 2003. Reasons behind consumers' functional food choices. Nutr. Food Sci. 33, 148-158.
33. URALA, N. and LÄHTEENMÄKI, L. 2004. Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods. Food Qual. Pref. 15, 793-803.
34. VAN KLEEF, E., VAN TRIJP, H.C.M. and LUNING, P. 2005. Functional foods: Health claim-food product compatibility and the impact of health claim framing on consumer evaluation. Appetite 44, 299-308.
35. VÁZQUEZ, M.B., CURIA, A. and HOUGH, G. 2009. Sensory descriptive analysis, sensory acceptability and expectation studies on biscuits with reduced added salt and increased fiber. J. Sensory Studies 24, 498-511.
36. VERBEKE, W. 2006. Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health? Food Qual. Pref. 17, 126-131.
37. VICKERS, Z.M. 1993. Incorporating tasting into a conjoint analysis of taste, health claim, price and brand for purchasing strawberry yogurt. J. Sensory Studies 8, 341-352.