BRCA2 diffuses as oligomeric clusters with RAD51 and changes mobility after DNA damage in live cells

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 207, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 599-613

  Reuter, Marcel ^a   Zelensky, Alex ^a   Smal, Ihor ^a   Meijering, Erik ^a   van Cappellen, Wiggert A ^a   de Gruiter, H Martijn ^a   van Belle, Gijsbert J ^a   van Royen, Martin E ^a   Houtsmuller, Adriaan B ^a   Essers, Jeroen ^a   Kanaar, Roland ^a   Wyman, Claire ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRCA2 PROTEIN; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD54 PROTEIN; YELLOW FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; HYBRID PROTEIN; PROTEIN AGGREGATE; PROTEIN BINDING; RAD51 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL TRACKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DNA DAMAGE; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FLUORESCENCE CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY; GENE CLUSTER; GENE LOCUS; GENE TARGETING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; 129 MOUSE; ANIMAL; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HELA CELL LINE; METABOLISM; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; VIDEO MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; BRCA2 PROTEIN; DNA DAMAGE; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, 129 STRAIN; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MICROSCOPY, VIDEO; PROTEIN AGGREGATES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84919968901     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201405014     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abraham, J., B. Lemmers, M.P. Hande, M.E. Moynahan, C. Chahwan, A. Ciccia, J. Essers, K. Hanada, R. Chahwan, A.K. Khaw, et al. 2003. Eme1 is involved in DNA damage processing and maintenance of genomic stability in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 22:6137-6147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg580
2. Abràmoff, M.D., P.J. Magalhães, and S.J. Ram. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 11:36-42.
3. Adams, D.J., M.A. Quail, T. Cox, L. van der Weyden, B.D. Gorick, Q. Su, W.I. Chan, R. Davies, J.K. Bonfield, F. Law, et al. 2005. A genome-wide, end-sequenced 129Sv BAC library resource for targeting vector construction. Genomics. 86:753-758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.08.003
4. Agarwal, S., W.A. van Cappellen, A. Guénolé, B. Eppink, S.E. Linsen, E. Meijering, A. Houtsmuller, R. Kanaar, and J. Essers. 2011. ATP-dependent and independent functions of Rad54 in genome maintenance. J. Cell Biol. 192:735-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201011025
5. Anastassiadis, K., J. Fu, C. Patsch, S. Hu, S. Weidlich, K. Duerschke, F. Buchholz, F. Edenhofer, and A.F. Stewart. 2009. Dre recombinase, like Cre, is a highly efficient site-specific recombinase in E. coli, mammalian cells and mice. Dis. Model. Mech. 2:508-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.003087
6. Brugmans, L., N.S. Verkaik, M. Kunen, E. van Drunen, B.R. Williams, J.H. Petrini, R. Kanaar, J. Essers, and D.C. van Gent. 2009. NBS1 cooperates with homologous recombination to counteract chromosome breakage during replication. DNA Repair (Amst.). 8:1363-1370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.09.002
7. Cadiñanos, J., and A. Bradley. 2007. Generation of an inducible and optimized piggyBac transposon system. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:e87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm446
8. Carreira, A., and S.C. Kowalczykowski. 2011. Two classes of BRC repeats in BRCA2 promote RAD51 nucleoprotein filament function by distinct mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:10448-10453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106971108
9. Chen, P.L., C.F. Chen, Y. Chen, J. Xiao, Z.D. Sharp, and W.H. Lee. 1998. The BRC repeats in BRCA2 are critical for RAD51 binding and resistance to methyl methanesulfonate treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:5287-5292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.9.5287
10. Chen, C.F., P.L. Chen, Q. Zhong, Z.D. Sharp, and W.H. Lee. 1999. Expression of BRC repeats in breast cancer cells disrupts the BRCA2-Rad51 complex and leads to radiation hypersensitivity and loss of G2/M checkpoint control. J. Biol. Chem. 274:32931-32935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.46.32931
11. Chenouard, N., I. Smal, F. de Chaumont, M. Maška, I.F. Sbalzarini, Y. Gong, J. Cardinale, C. Carthel, S. Coraluppi, M. Winter, et al. 2014. Objective comparison of particle tracking methods. Nat. Methods. 11:281-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2808
12. Cox, J., and M. Mann. 2008. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26:1367-1372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1511
13. Cox, J., N. Neuhauser, A. Michalski, R.A. Scheltema, J.V. Olsen, and M. Mann. 2011. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 10:1794-1805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr101065j
14. Davies, A.A., J.-Y. Masson, M.J. McIlwraith, A.Z. Stasiak, A. Stasiak, A.R. Venkitaraman, and S.C. West. 2001. Role of BRCA2 in control of the RAD51 recombination and DNA repair protein. Mol. Cell. 7:273-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00175-7
15. Dickson, R.M., A.B. Cubitt, R.Y. Tsien, and W.E. Moerner. 1997. On/offblinking and switching behaviour of single molecules of green fluorescent protein. Nature. 388:355-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/41048
16. Duong, T., B. Goud, and K. Schauer. 2012. Closed-form density-based framework for automatic detection of cellular morphology changes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:8382-8387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117796109
17. Erdel, F., K. Müller-Ott, M. Baum, M. Wachsmuth, and K. Rippe. 2011. Dissecting chromatin interactions in living cells from protein mobility maps. Chromosome Res. 19:99-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-010-9155-6
18. Essers, J., R.W. Hendriks, S.M. Swagemakers, C. Troelstra, J. de Wit, D. Bootsma, J.H. Hoeijmakers, and R. Kanaar. 1997. Disruption of mouse RAD54 reduces ionizing radiation resistance and homologous recombination. Cell. 89:195-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80199-3
19. Essers, J., R.W. Hendriks, J. Wesoly, C.E. Beerens, B. Smit, J.H. Hoeijmakers, C. Wyman, M.L. Dronkert, and R. Kanaar. 2002a. Analysis of mouse Rad54 expression and its implications for homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst.). 1:779-793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1568-7864(02)00110-6
20. Essers, J., A.B. Houtsmuller, L. van Veelen, C. Paulusma, A.L. Nigg, A. Pastink, W. Vermeulen, J.H. Hoeijmakers, and R. Kanaar. 2002b. Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 21:2030-2037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.8.2030
21. Essers, J., A.B. Houtsmuller, and R. Kanaar. 2006. Analysis of DNA recombination and repair proteins in living cells by photobleaching microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 408:463-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(06)08029-3
22. Gibson, D.G., L. Young, R.-Y. Chuang, J.C. Venter, C.A. Hutchison III, and H.O. Smith. 2009. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods. 6:343-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1318
23. Grünwald, D., R.M. Martin, V. Buschmann, D.P. Bazett-Jones, H. Leonhardt, U. Kubitscheck, and M.C. Cardoso. 2008. Probing intranuclear environments at the single-molecule level. Biophys. J. 94:2847-2858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.115014
24. Haaf, T., E.I. Golub, G. Reddy, C.M. Radding, and D.C. Ward. 1995. Nuclear foci of mammalian Rad51 recombination protein in somatic cells after DNA damage and its localization in synaptonemal complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:2298-2302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.6.2298
25. Haupts, U., S. Maiti, P. Schwille, and W.W. Webb. 1998. Dynamics of fluorescence fluctuations in green fluorescent protein observed by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:13573-13578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.23.13573
26. Haustein, E., and P. Schwille. 2007. Trends in fluorescence imaging and related techniques to unravel biological information. HFSP J. 1:169-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.2976/1.2778852
27. He, Y., S. Burov, R. Metzler, and E. Barkai. 2008. Random time-scale invariant diffusion and transport coefficients. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101:058101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.058101
28. Heyer, W.D., K.T. Ehmsen, and J. Liu. 2010. Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 44:113-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955
29. Hockemeyer, D., F. Soldner, C. Beard, Q. Gao, M. Mitalipova, R.C. DeKelver, G.E. Katibah, R. Amora, E.A. Boydston, B. Zeitler, et al. 2009. Efficient targeting of expressed and silent genes in human ESCs and iPSCs using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 27:851-857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1562
30. Hoogstraten, D., A.L. Nigg, H. Heath, L.H. Mullenders, R. van Driel, J.H. Hoeijmakers, W. Vermeulen, and A.B. Houtsmuller. 2002. Rapid switching of TFIIH between RNA polymerase I and II transcription and DNA repair in vivo. Mol. Cell. 10:1163-1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00709-8
31. Jaqaman, K., D. Loerke, M. Mettlen, H. Kuwata, S. Grinstein, S.L. Schmid, and G. Danuser. 2008. Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell timelapse sequences. Nat. Methods. 5:695-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1237
32. Jensen, R.B., A. Carreira, and S.C. Kowalczykowski. 2010. Purified human BRCA2 stimulates RAD51-mediated recombination. Nature. 467:678-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09399
33. Jeyasekharan, A.D., N. Ayoub, R. Mahen, J. Ries, A. Esposito, E. Rajendra, H. Hattori, R.P. Kulkarni, and A.R. Venkitaraman. 2010. DNA damage regulates the mobility of Brca2 within the nucleoplasm of living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:21937-21942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009577107
34. Jeyasekharan, A.D., Y. Liu, H. Hattori, V. Pisupati, A.B. Jonsdottir, E. Rajendra, M. Lee, E. Sundaramoorthy, S. Schlachter, C.F. Kaminski, et al. 2013. A cancer-associated BRCA2 mutation reveals masked nuclear export signals controlling localization. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20:1191-1198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2666
35. Katagiri, T., H. Saito, A. Shinohara, H. Ogawa, N. Kamada, Y. Nakamura, and Y. Miki. 1998. Multiple possible sites of BRCA2 interacting with DNA repair protein RAD51. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 21:217-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199803)21:3<217:: AID-GCC5>3.0.CO;2-2
36. Kerssemakers, J.W., E.L. Munteanu, L. Laan, T.L. Noetzel, M.E. Janson, and M. Dogterom. 2006. Assembly dynamics of microtubules at molecular resolution. Nature. 442:709-712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04928
37. Krawczyk, P.M., B. Eppink, J. Essers, J. Stap, H. Rodermond, H. Odijk, A. Zelensky, C. van Bree, L.J. Stalpers, M.R. Buist, et al. 2011. Mild hyperthermia inhibits homologous recombination, induces BRCA2 degradation, and sensitizes cancer cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:9851-9856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101053108
38. Liu, J., T. Doty, B. Gibson, and W.D. Heyer. 2010. Human BRCA2 protein promotes RAD51 filament formation on RPA-covered single-stranded DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:1260-1262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1904
39. Löbrich, M., A. Shibata, A. Beucher, A. Fisher, M. Ensminger, A.A. Goodarzi, O. Barton, and P.A. Jeggo. 2010. ?H2AX foci analysis for monitoring DNA double-strand break repair: strengths, limitations and optimization. Cell Cycle. 9:662-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.4.10764
40. Magwood, A.C., M.J. Malysewich, I. Cealic, M.M. Mundia, J. Knapp, and M.D. Baker. 2013. Endogenous levels of Rad51 and Brca2 are required for homologous recombination and regulated by homeostatic rebalancing. DNA Repair (Amst.). 12:1122-1133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.10.006
41. Mazza, D., A. Abernathy, N. Golob, T. Morisaki, and J.G. McNally. 2012. A benchmark for chromatin binding measurements in live cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:e119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks701
42. Meijering, E., O. Dzyubachyk, and I. Smal. 2012. Methods for cell and particle tracking. Methods Enzymol. 504:183-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-391857-4.00009-4
43. Mizuta, R., J.M. LaSalle, H.L. Cheng, A. Shinohara, H. Ogawa, N. Copeland, N.A. Jenkins, M. Lalande, and F.W. Alt. 1997. RAB22 and RAB163/mouse BRCA2: proteins that specifically interact with the RAD51 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:6927-6932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.13.6927
44. Montenegro Gouveia, S., K. Leslie, L.C. Kapitein, R.M. Buey, I. Grigoriev, M. Wagenbach, I. Smal, E. Meijering, C.C. Hoogenraad, L. Wordeman, et al. 2010. In vitro reconstitution of the functional interplay between MCAK and EB3 at microtubule plus ends. Curr. Biol. 20:1717-1722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.020
45. Nagai, T., K. Ibata, E.S. Park, M. Kubota, K. Mikoshiba, and A. Miyawaki. 2002. A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:87-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0102-87
46. Rajendra, E., and A.R. Venkitaraman. 2010. Two modules in the BRC repeats of BRCA2 mediate structural and functional interactions with the RAD51 recombinase. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:82-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp873
47. Roy, R., J. Chun, and S.N. Powell. 2012. BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 12:68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc3181
48. Saeki, H., N. Siaud, N. Christ, W.W. Wiegant, P.P.W. van Buul, M. Han, M.Z. Zdzienicka, J.M. Stark, and M. Jasin. 2006. Suppression of the DNA repair defects of BRCA2-deficient cells with heterologous protein fusions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:8768-8773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600298103
49. Sanchez, H., M. Reuter, M. Yokokawa, K. Takeyasu, and C. Wyman. 2014. Taking it one step at a time in homologous recombination repair. DNA Repair (Amst.). 20:110-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.02.012
50. Schlacher, K., N. Christ, N. Siaud, A. Egashira, H. Wu, and M. Jasin. 2011. Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell. 145:529-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.041
51. Schütz, G.J., H. Schindler, and T. Schmidt. 1997. Single-molecule microscopy on model membranes reveals anomalous diffusion. Biophys. J. 73:1073-1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78139-6
52. Schwille, P., S. Kummer, A.A. Heikal, W.E. Moerner, and W.W. Webb. 2000. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy reveals fast optical excitationdriven intramolecular dynamics of yellow fluorescent proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:151-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.1.151
53. Shahid, T., J. Soroka, E.H. Kong, L. Malivert, M.J. McIlwraith, T. Pape, S.C. West, and X. Zhang. 2014. Structure and mechanism of action of the BRCA2 breast cancer tumor suppressor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21:962-968. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2899
54. Sharan, S.K., M. Morimatsu, U. Albrecht, D.S. Lim, E. Regel, C. Dinh, A. Sands, G. Eichele, P. Hasty, and A. Bradley. 1997. Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2. Nature. 386:804-810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/386804a0
55. Siaud, N., M.A. Barbera, A. Egashira, I. Lam, N. Christ, K. Schlacher, B. Xia, and M. Jasin. 2011. Plasticity of BRCA2 function in homologous recombination: genetic interactions of the PALB2 and DNA binding domains. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002409
56. Speil, J., and U. Kubitscheck. 2010. Single ovalbumin molecules exploring nucleoplasm and nucleoli of living cell nuclei. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1803:396-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.10.010
57. Stark, J.M., P. Hu, A.J. Pierce, M.E. Moynahan, N. Ellis, and M. Jasin. 2002. ATP hydrolysis by mammalian RAD51 has a key role during homologydirected DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 277:20185-20194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M112132200
58. Tan, T.L., J. Essers, E. Citterio, S.M. Swagemakers, J. de Wit, F.E. Benson, J.H. Hoeijmakers, and R. Kanaar. 1999. Mouse Rad54 affects DNA conformation and DNA-damage-induced Rad51 foci formation. Curr. Biol. 9:325-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80142-0
59. Testa, G., K. Vintersten, Y. Zhang, V. Benes, J.P. Muyrers, and A.F. Stewart. 2004. BAC engineering for the generation of ES cell-targeting constructs and mouse transgenes. Methods Mol. Biol. 256:123-139.
60. Thomann, D., D.R. Rines, P.K. Sorger, and G. Danuser. 2002. Automatic fluorescent tag detection in 3D with super-resolution: application to the analysis of chromosome movement. J. Microsc. 208:49-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01066.x
61. Thompson, R.E., D.R. Larson, and W.W. Webb. 2002. Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. Biophys. J. 82:2775-2783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75618-X
62. Thorslund, T., M.J. McIlwraith, S.A. Compton, S. Lekomtsev, M. Petronczki, J.D. Griffith, and S.C. West. 2010. The breast cancer tumor suppressor BRCA2 promotes the specific targeting of RAD51 to single-stranded DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:1263-1265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1905
63. Tokunaga, M., N. Imamoto, and K. Sakata-Sogawa. 2008. Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells. Nat. Methods. 5:159-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1171
64. Ulbrich, M.H., and E.Y. Isacoff. 2007. Subunit counting in membrane-bound proteins. Nat. Methods. 4:319-321.
65. Uringa, E.J., C. Baldeyron, H. Odijk, and E. Wassenaar, W.A. van Cappellen, A. Maas, A.J. Grootegoed, J.H.J. Hoeijmakers, W.M. Baarends, R. Kanaar, and J. Essers. 2014. A mRad51-GFP antimorphic allele affects homologous recombination and DNA damage sensitivity. DNA Repair (Amst.). In press.
66. van den Wildenberg, S.M., Y.J. Bollen, and E.J. Peterman. 2011. How to quantify protein diffusion in the bacterial membrane. Biopolymers. 95:312-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bip.21585
67. van Royen, M.E., S.M. Cunha, M.C. Brink, K.A. Mattern, A.L. Nigg, H.J. Dubbink, P.J. Verschure, J. Trapman, and A.B. Houtsmuller. 2007. Compartmentalization of androgen receptor protein-protein interactions in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 177:63-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200609178
68. Van Royen, M.E., W.A. van Cappellen, B. Geverts, T. Schmidt, A.B. Houtsmuller, and M.J. Schaaf. 2014. Androgen receptor complexes probe DNA for recognition sequences by short random interactions. J. Cell Sci. 127:1406-1416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.135228
69. van Veelen, L.R., J. Essers, M.W. van de Rakt, H. Odijk, A. Pastink, M.Z. Zdzienicka, C.C. Paulusma, and R. Kanaar. 2005. Ionizing radiationinduced foci formation of mammalian Rad51 and Rad54 depends on the Rad51 paralogs, but not on Rad52. Mutat. Res. 574:34-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.020
70. Vaughn, J.P., F.D. Cirisano, G. Huper, A. Berchuck, P.A. Futreal, J.R. Marks, and J.D. Iglehart. 1996. Cell cycle control of BRCA2. Cancer Res. 56:4590-4594.
71. Weisshart, K., V. Jüngel, and S.J. Briddon. 2004. The LSM 510 META - ConfoCor 2 system: an integrated imaging and spectroscopic platform for single-molecule detection. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 5:135-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389201043376913
72. Wilkinson, D.J. 2011. Stochastic modeling for systems biology. Second edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 363 pp.
73. Williams, B.R., O.K. Mirzoeva, W.F. Morgan, J. Lin, W. Dunnick, and J.H. Petrini. 2002. A murine model of Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Curr. Biol. 12:648-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00763-7
74. Xie, X.S., P.J. Choi, G.W. Li, N.K. Lee, and G. Lia. 2008. Single-molecule approach to molecular biology in living bacterial cells. Annu Rev Biophys. 37:417-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092607.174640
75. Yu, D.S., E. Sonoda, S. Takeda, C.L. Huang, L. Pellegrini, T.L. Blundell, and A.R. Venkitaraman. 2003. Dynamic control of Rad51 recombinase by self-association and interaction with BRCA2. Mol. Cell. 12:1029-1041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00394-0
76. Zhang, B., J. Zerubia, and J.C. Olivo-Marin. 2007. Gaussian approximations of fluorescence microscope point-spread function models. Appl. Opt. 46:1819-1829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.001819