Dilemmas of difference inclusion and disability: International perspectives and future directions

Dilemmas of Difference Inclusion and Disability: International Perspectives and Future Directions

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-228

  Norwich, Brahm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911207018     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203938867     Document Type: Book

References (114)

1. Arnove, R.F. (2001) Facing the 21st century: challenges and contribution. Presidential Address. Comparative Education Review, 45 (4), 477-503.
2. Artiles, A.J. (1998) The dilemma of difference: enriching the disproportionality discourse with theory and context. Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 322-36.
3. Artiles, A.J. (2000) The inclusive education movement and minority representation in special education: trends, paradoxes and dilemmas. Paper to ISEC International Conference, University of Manchester, UK.
4. Asprey, A. and Nash, T. (2005) Including young people with degenerative neuromuscular disease in mainstream education. Barnstaple: Children's Hospice Southwest.
5. Audit Commission (2002a) Statutory assessment and statements of SEN: in need of review? London, Audit Commission.
6. Audit Commission (2002b) Special educational needs: a mainstream issue. London: Audit Commission.
7. Berlak, A. and Berlak, H. (1981) Dilemmas of schooling: teaching and social change. London, Methuen.
8. Berlin, I. (1990) The crooked timber of humanity. London: Fontana Press.
9. Bernstein, B. (1970) Theoretical studies: towards a sociology of language, vol. 1. London: Routledge, Kegan, Paul.
10. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. and Radley, A. (1988) Ideological dilemmas: a social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
11. Booth, T., Ainscow, M., Black-Hawkins, K., Vaughn, M. and Shaw, L. (2000) Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol: CSIE.
12. Burbules, N.C. (1997) A grammar of difference: some ways of rethinking difference and diversity as educational topics. Australian Education Researcher. http://faculty.ed.uiuc.edu/burbules/papers/difference.html (accessed 19 October 2006).
13. Campbell, C. (2002) Conceptualisations and definitions of inclusive schooling, in Campbell, C. et al. (eds) Developing inclusive schooling: perspectives, policies and practices. London: Institute of Education, Bedford Way Papers.
14. Campbell, C, Gillborn, D., Lunt, I., Sammons, P., Vincent, C., Warren, S. and Whitty, G. (2002) Strategies and issues for inclusive schooling, in Campbell, C. et al. (eds) Developing inclusive schooling: perspectives, policies and practices. London: Institute of Education, Bedford Way Papers.
15. Clough, P. (2006) Review of 'Moderate learning difficulties and the future of inclusion', European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(2), 227-29.
16. Clough, P. and Corbett, J. (2000) Theories of inclusive education: a student's guide. London: Paul Chapman.
17. Cole, B. (2005) Good faith and effort? Perspectives on educational inclusion. Disability and Society, 20(3), 287-307.
18. Croll, P. and Moses, D. (2000) Ideologies and utopias: education professionals' views of inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 15(1), 1-12.
19. Dahl, R.A. (1982) Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: autonomy and control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. DES (1978) Warnock Committee Report. London: HMSO.
21. DfE (1994) Code of Practice on the identification and assessment of special educational needs. London: DfE.
22. DfEE (1997) Excellence for all children: meeting special educational needs. London:HMSO.
23. DfES (2002) SEN Code of Practice. London: DfES.
24. DfES (2003a) Data collection by type of special educational needs. London: DfES.
25. DfES (2003b) Targeting support: choosing and implementing interventions for children with significant literacy difficulties. Management guidance DfES 0201/2003.
26. DfES (2004) Children's Trusts: Developing Integrated Services for Children in England, National Evaluation of Children's Trusts, Phase 1 Interim Report. London: DfES.
27. DfES (2005) SEN in England 2005. National Statistics, First release. London: DfES.
28. Disability Rights Commission (2003) Code of Practice for Schools. London: DRC.
29. Drasgow, E., Yell, M.L. and Robinson, T.R (2001) Developing legally correct and educationally appropriate IEPs. Remedial and Special Education, 22(6), 359-73.
30. Drisko, J.W. (2000) Qualitative data analysis: it's not just anything goes! Charleston, SC: Society from Social Work and Research Conference, 30 January, 458.
31. Dyson, A. (2000) Inclusion and inclusions: theories and discourse in inclusion, in Daniels, H. and Garner, P. (eds) Supporting inclusive in education systems. London: Kogan Page.
32. Dyson, A. (2001) Special needs in the twenty-first century: where we've been and where we're going. British Journal of Special Education, 28(1), 24-29.
33. Dyson, A. and Millward, A. (2000) Schools and special needs: issues in innovation and inclusion. London: Sage.
34. Edwards, D. and Mercer, N.M. (1987) Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.
35. European Agency for Development of Special Needs Education (2004) Netherlands overview. www.european-agency.org/nat_ovs/netherlands/index.html (accessed 24 July 2006).
36. Eurydice (2004) Summary sheet on education systems in Europe: the Netherlands. www.eurydice.org (accessed July 2006).
37. Florian, L. and Rouse, M. (2001) International perspectives on school reform and SEN (editorial). Cambridge Journal of Education, 31(3), 285-89.
38. Ford, A., Davern, L. and Schnorr, R. (2001) Learners with significant disabilities:curricular relevance in an era of standards based reform. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 214-22.
39. Fulcher, G. (1989) Disabling policies? A comparative approach to educational policy and disability. Lewes: Falmer.
40. Gewirtz, S. (2002) The managerial school: post-welfarism and social justice in education. London: Routledge.
41. Giddens, A. (1994) Beyond left and right: the future of radical politics. Cambridge:Polity Press.
42. Goodhart, D. (2004) Too diverse? Prospect, February, 30-37.
43. Gray, J. (1989) Liberalisms: essays in political philosophies. London: Routledge.
44. Hamstra, G (2000) 'Just different': special education in an experimental setting in Almere. Paper to ISEC International Conference, University of Manchester, UK.
45. Ho, A. (2004) To be labelled or not to be labelled: that is the question. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 86-92.
46. House of Commons Select Committee on Education and Skills (2006) Special educational needs, Volume 1. London: TSO.
47. Howe, K.P. and Welner, K.G. (2002) School choice and the pressure to perform:déjà vu for children with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 212-21.
48. Huefner, D.S. (2000) The risks and opportunities of the requirements under IDEA 1997. Exceptional Children, 33, 195-204.
49. Hursh, D. (2005) The growth of high-stakes testing in the USA: accountability, markets and the decline in educational equality. British Educational Research Journal, 31(5), 605-22.
50. Ignatieff, M. (1998) Isaiah Berlin, a life. London: Chatto and Windus.
51. Judge, H. (1981) Dilemmas in education, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22, 111-16.
52. Katsiyannis, A., Yell, M.L. and Bradley, R. (2001) Reflecting on the 25th anniversary of the Individuals with Disability Education Act, Remedial and Special Education, 22(6), 324-33.
53. Kaufman, J.M. (1989) The regular education initiative as Reagan-Bush education policy: a trickle down theories of education of the hard-to-teach. Journal of Special Education, 23(3), 256-78.
54. Kaufman, J.M. and Hallahan, D.P. (1995) The illusion of full inclusion: a comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
55. Kaufman, J.M., McGee, K. and Brigham M. (2004) Enabling or disabling? Observations on changes in special education. Phi Delta Kappan, April, 613-20.
56. Kennedy, R. (1999) Facing the dilemmas of difference, in Lowe, E.Y. (ed.) Promise and dilemma: perspectives on racial diversity and higher education. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
57. Kohlberg, L. (1984) Essays on moral development. Vol. 2, The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
58. Layder, D. (1998) Sociological practice: linking theory and social research. London:Sage.
59. Levitas, R. (1990) The concept of utopia. London: Philip Allen.
60. Linn, R.L. (2005) Fixing the NCLB accountability system. CRESST Policy Brief, UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.
61. Lipsky, D.K. and Gartner, A. (1996) Equity requires inclusion; the future for all students with disabilities, in Christensen, C. and Ritzi, F. (eds) Disability and the dilemmas of education and justice. London: Open University Press.
62. Lunt, I. and Norwich, B. (1999) Can effective schools be inclusive? London: Institute of Education, Bedford Way Series.
63. MacBeath, J., Galton, M., Steward, S., MacBeath, A. and Page, C. (2006) The costs of inclusion. Report for the NUT. University of Cambridge.
64. McDonnell, L.M., McLaughlin, M.J. and Morrison, P. (1997) Educating one and all:students with disabilities and standards based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
65. McLaughlin, M. and Henderson, K. (2000) Defining US special education into the twenty-first century, in Winzer, M.A. and Mazurek, K. (eds) Special education in the 21st century: issues of inclusion and reform. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
66. McLaughlin, M.J., Dyson, A., Nagle, K., Thurlow, M., Rouse, M., Hardman, M. et al. (2006) Cross-cultural perspectives on the classification of children with disabilities. Part II. Implementing classification systems in schools. Journal of Special Education, 40(1), 46-58.
67. Marshak, D. (2003) No Child Left Behind: a foolish race to the past. Phi Delta Kappan, November, 229-31.
68. Mead, G.H. (1934) The works of George Herbert Mead. Vol. 1, Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
69. Meijer, C.J.W. (2000) Funding and inclusion, in SEN Policy Options Steering Group (eds) Developments in additional resource allocation to promote greater inclusion. Tamworth: NASEN.
70. Minow, M. (1985) Learning to live with the dilemma of difference: bilingual and special education, in Bartlett, K.T. and Wegner, J.W. (eds) Children with special needs. Boulder, CO: Transaction Books.
71. Minow, M. (1990) Making all the difference: inclusion, exclusion and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
72. Minow, M. (2005) The dilemma of difference, in Adams, D.M. (ed.) Philosophical problems in the law, 4th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
73. National Disability Council (1989) The education of students with disabilities: where we stand? Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
74. Neill, M. (2003) Leaving children behind: how No Child Left Behind will fail our children. Phi Delta Kappan, November, 225-28.
75. Netherlands Ministry of Education (2006) Special needs education statistics for the Netherlands (personal communication).
76. Nilholm, C. (2006) Special education, inclusion and democracy. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(4), 431-45.
77. Norwich, B. (1990) Reappraising special needs education. London: Cassell.
78. Norwich, B. (1993a) Has 'special educational needs' outlived its usefulness? in Visser, J. and Upton, G. (eds) Special education in Britain after Warnock. London: David Fulton Publishers.
79. Norwich, B. (1993b) Ideological dilemmas in special needs education: practitioners' views. Oxford Review of Education, 19(4), 527-45.
80. Norwich, B. (1994) Differentiation: from the perspective of resolving tensions between basic social values and assumptions about individual differences. Curriculum Studies, 2(3), 289-308.
81. Norwich, B. (2002) LEA inclusion trends in England 1997-2001. Bristol: CSIE.
82. Norwich, B. and Kelly, N. (2004) Moderate learning difficulties and the future of inclusive education, London: Routledge.
83. OECD (2000) Special needs education: statistics and indicators. Paris: OECD.
84. Office of National Statistics (2001) National census data 2001. London: ONS.
85. Ofsted (2004) Special educational needs and disability: towards inclusive schools. London: Office for Standards in Education.
86. Pijl, S.J. and Meijer, C.J.W. (1991) Does integration count for much? An analysis of the practices of integration in eight countries. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 6(2), 100-11.
87. Pijl, Y.L and Pijl, S.J. (1995) Ontwikkelingen in de deelname aan het speciaal onderwijs [Developments in participation in special education]. Pedagogische Studien [Educational Studies], 72, 102-13.
88. Pijl S.P. and Van den Bos, K. (2001) Redesigning regular education support in the Netherlands. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 16(2), 111-19.
89. Pijl, S.P. and Veneman, H. (2005) Evaluating new criteria and procedures for funding special needs education in the Netherlands. Educational Management and Administration and Leadership, 33(1), 93-108.
90. Pugach, M.C. and Warger, C.L. (2000) Curriculum matters: raising expectations for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 194-96.
91. Qualifications and Curriculum Agency (2003) Planning, teaching and assessing the curriculum for pupils with learning difficulties. London: QCA.
92. Raveaud, M. (2005) Hares, tortoises and the social construction of the pupil: differentiated learning in French and English primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 459-79.
93. Reezigt, G.J. and Pijl, S.J. (1998) The Netherlands: a springboard for other initiatives, in Booth, T. and Ainscow, M. (eds) From them to us: an international study of inclusive education. London: Routledge.
94. Rodbard, G. (1990) Going Dutch! A perspective on the Dutch system of special education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 5(3), 221-29.
95. Sailor, W. and Roger, B. (2005) Rethinking inclusion: schoolwide applications. Phi Delta Kappan, March, 503-9.
96. Scheepstra, A., Nakken, H. and Pijl, S.P. (1999) Contacts with classmates: the social position of pupils with Down Syndrome in Dutch primary schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 14(3), 212-20.
97. Sen, A. (1992) Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
98. Smith, T.E.C. (2000) Section 504, the ADA and the public schools. Remedial and Special Education, 22(6), 335-43.
99. Stocker, M. (1990) Plural and conflicting values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100. Terzi, L (2007) Beyond the dilemma of difference: the capability approach to disability and special educational needs, in Florian, L. and McClaughlin, M. (eds) Categories in special education. London: Sage.
101. Thomas, G. and Feiler, A. (1988) Planning for special needs: a whole school approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
102. Thomas, G. and Loxley, A (2001) Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
103. Thurlow, M. (2002) Positive educational results for all students. Remedial and Special Education, 23(4), 195-202.
104. Triano, S. (2000) Categorical eligibility for special education: the enshrinement of the medical model. Disability Studies Quarterly, 20(4), 399-412.
105. UNESCO (1994) The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris: UNESCO.
106. US Department of Education (1997) Nineteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the IDEA. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.
107. US Department of Education (2002) Twenty fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the IDEA. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.
108. US Department of Education (2003) Twenty fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the IDEA. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.
109. Van Houten, D. and Bellemakers, C. (2002) Equal citizenship for all. Disability policies in the Netherlands: empowerment of marginals. Disability and Society, 17(2), 171-85.
110. Vislie, L (2003) From integration to inclusion: focusing global trends and changes in the western European societies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18(1), 17-35.
111. Warnock, M. (2005) Special educational needs: a new look. Impact.
112. Weber, C. (1997) 'De Rugzak' komende veranderingen in het speciaal onderwijs ['The backpack': Impending changes in special education]. Bilthoven: NVA (Dutch Autistic Society).
113. Will, M.C. (1986) Educating children with learning problems: a shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411-16.
114. Ysseldyke, J.E., Olsen, K. and Thurlow, M. (1997) Issues and considerations in alternative assessments. Minneapolis University, National Center for Educational Outcomes. ERIC Document Service, No. ED 415-616.