The psychology of environmental decisions

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 39, Issue , 2014, Pages 443-467

  Newell, Ben R ^a   McDonald, Rachel I ^a,b   Brewer, Marilynn ^a   Hayes, Brett K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Environment; Framing; Mental model; Psychological distance; Social dilemma; Social norms; Worldview

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

ENVIRONMENT; FRAMING; MENTAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL DILEMMAS; SOCIAL NORM; WORLDVIEW;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84908037947     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-010713-094623     Document Type: Review

References (149)

1. Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF. 2000. The "Anthropocene." Global Change Newsletter, May 2000, 41:17-18. http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/NL41.pdf
2. De Groot JIM, Steg L. 2010. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. J. Environ. Psychol. 30:368-78
3. Kinzig AP, Ehrlich PR, Alston LJ, Arrow K, Barrett S, et al. 2013. Social norms and global environmental challenges: the complex interaction of behaviors, values, and policy. Bioscience 63:164-75
4. Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I. 2005. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 1:95-108
5. Axsen J, Kurani KS. 2012. Social influence, consumer behavior, and low-carbon energy transitions. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37:311-40
6. Dinner I, Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG, Liu K. 2011. Partitioning default effects: why people choose not to choose. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 17:332-41
7. Wilson C, Dowlatabadi H. 2007. Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32:169-203
8. De Groot JIM, Steg L. 2008. Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environ. Behav. 40:330-54
9. Stern PC. 2000. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56:407-24
10. Newell BR, Lagnado DA, Shanks DR. 2010. Straight Choices: The Psychology of Decision Making. Hove, UK: Psychology
11. Polasky S, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Keeler B. 2011. Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:398-404
12. Newell BR, Pitman AJ. 2010. The psychology of global warming: improving the fit between the science and the message. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91:1003-14
13. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W. 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62:451-82
14. Newell B. 2013. Judgment under uncertainty. In Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, ed. D Reisberg, pp. 603-17. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
15. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124-31
16. Gifford R. 2011. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 66:290-302
17. Price J, Walker I, Boschetti F. 2014. Measuring cultural values and beliefs about environment to identify their role in climate change responses. J. Environ. Psychol. 37:8-20
18. Guy S, Kashima Y, Walker I, O'Neill S. 2013. Comparing the atmosphere to a bathtub: effectiveness of analogy for reasoning about accumulation. Clim. Change 121:579-94
19. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N. 2012. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal. 32:957-72
20. Fischhoff B. 2011. Applying the science of communication to the communication of science. Clim. Change 108:701-5
21. Steg L, Vlek C. 2009. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 29:309-17
22. Schwartz SH. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 25:1-65
23. Villacorta M, Koestner R, Lekes N. 2003. Further validation of the motivation toward the environment scale. Environ. Behav. 35:486-505
24. Steg L, De Groot JIM, Dreijerink L, Abrahamse W, Siero F. 2011. General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: the role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Soc. Nat. Resour. 24:349-67
25. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE. 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J. Soc. Issues 56:425-42
26. Dunlap RE. 2008. The new environmental paradigm scale: from marginality to worldwide use. J. Environ. Educ. 40:3-18
27. Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D. 2011. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J. Risk Res. 14:147-74
28. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, et al. 2012. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Change 2:732-35
29. Douglas M. 1978. Cultural Bias. London: R. Anthropol. Inst.
30. Slovic P. 2000. The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan
31. McCaffrey M, Rosenau J. 2012. Science literacy still matters. Nat. Clim. Change 2:636
32. Feinberg M, Willer R. 2013. The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol. Sci. 24:56-62
33. Markowitz EM, Shariff AF. 2012. Climate change and moral judgement. Nat. Clim. Change 2:243-47
34. Oreskes N, Conway EM. 2010. Defeating the merchants of doubt. Nature 465:686-87
35. Dunlap RE. 2013. Climate change skepticism and denial: an introduction. Am. Behav. Sci. 57:691-98
36. Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, Gignac G. 2013. NASA faked the moon landing - therefore (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychol. Sci. 24:622-33
37. Bain PG, Hornsey MJ, Bongiorno R, Jeffries C. 2012. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat. Clim. Change 2:600-3
38. Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ. 2001. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Boston, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press
39. Sloman SA, Fernbach PM. 2011. Human representation and reasoning about complex causal systems. Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag. 10:85-99
40. Johnson-Laird PN. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
41. Chowdhury PD, Haque CE, Driedger SM. 2012. Public versus expert knowledge and perception of climate change-induced heat wave risk: a modified mental model approach. J. Risk Res. 15:149-68
42. Bord RJ, O'Connor RE, Fisher A. 2000. In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Underst. Sci. 9:205-18
43. Bostrom A, O'Connor RE, Böhm G, Hanss D, Bodi O, et al. 2012. Causal thinking and support for climate change policies: international survey findings. Glob. Environ. Change 22:210-22
44. Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF. 2011. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat. Clim. Change 1:46-49
45. Pidgeon N, Fischhoff B. 2011. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat. Clim. Change 1:35-41
46. Brechin SR. 2010. Public opinion: a cross-national view. In Routledge Handbook of Climate Change and Society, ed. C Lever-Tracy, pp. 179-209. New York: Routledge
47. Reynolds TW, Bostrom A, Read D, Morgan MG. 2010. Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal. 30:1520-38
48. Truelove HB, Parks C. 2012. Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors. J. Environ. Psychol. 32:246-59
49. Otto-Banaszak I, Matczak P, Wesseler J, Wechsung F. 2011. Different perceptions of adaptation to climate change: a mental model approach applied to the evidence from expert interviews. Reg. Environ. Change 11:217-28
50. Hatfield-Dodds S, Morrison M. 2010. Confusing opportunity costs, losses and forgone gains: assessing the effect of communication bias on support for climate change policy in the United States and Australia. Work. Pap. 9.10. CCEP, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian Natl. Univ., Canberra
51. Akerlof K, Maibach EW, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY, Neuman A. 2013. Do people "personally experience" global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob. Environ. Change 23:81-91
52. Blennow K, Persson J, Tomé M, Hanewinkel M. 2012. Climate change: Believing and seeing implies adapting. PLOS ONE 7:e50182
53. Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Akerlof K, Leiserowitz AA. 2013. The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat. Clim. Change 3:343-47
54. Reser JP, Bradley GL, Glendon AI, Ellul MC, Callaghan R. 2012. Public risk perceptions, understandings, and responses to climate change and natural disasters in Australia, 2010 and 2011. Final report. Natl. Clim. Change Adapt. Res. Facil., Gold Coast, Aust.
55. Weber EU, Stern PC. 2011. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am. Psychol. 66:315-28
56. Li Y, Johnson EJ, Zaval L. 2011. Local warming: Daily temperature change influences belief in global warming. Psychol. Sci. 22:454-59
57. Sterman JD. 2011. Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Clim. Change 108:811-26
58. Sterman JD, Sweeney LB. 2007. Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults' mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Clim. Change 80:213-38
59. Cronin MA, Gonzalez C, Sterman JD. 2009. Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 108:116-30
60. Moxnes E, Saysel AK. 2009. Misperceptions of global climate change: information policies. Clim. Change 93:15-37
61. Gentner D, Smith L. 2012. Analogical reasoning. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, ed. VS Ramachandran, pp. 130-36. Oxford, UK: Elsevier
62. Newell BR, Kary A, Moore C, Gonzalez C. 2013. Managing our debt: changing context reduces misunderstanding of global warming. Presented at Annu. Meet. Cognitive Sci. Soc., 35th, Berlin
63. Smith LA, Gentner D. 2012. Using spatial analogy to facilitate graph learning. In Spatial Cognition VIII, ed. C Stachniss, K Schill, D Uttal, pp. 196-209. Freiburg, Ger.: Springer
64. Sterman JD, Fiddaman T, Franck T, Jones A, McCauley S, et al. 2012. Climate interactive: theC-ROADS climate policy model. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 28:295-305
65. Dutt V, Gonzalez C. 2012. Human control of climate change. Clim. Change 111:497-518
66. Winz I, Brierley G, Trowsdale S. 2009. The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management. Water Resour. Manag. 23:1301-23
67. Biggs D, Abel N, Knight AT, Leitch A, Langston A, Ban NC. 2011. The implementation crisis in conservation planning: Could "mental models" help? Conserv. Lett. 4:169-83
68. Mohammed S, Ferzandi L, Hamilton K. 2010. Metaphor no more: a 15-year review of the team mental model construct. J. Manag. 36:876-910
69. Mathevet R, Etienne M, Lynam T, Calvet C. 2011. Water management in the Camargue Biosphere Reserve: insights from comparative mental models analysis. Ecol. Soc. 16:43
70. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1981. The framing of decisions. Science 211:453-58
71. Hardisty DJ, Johnson EJ, Weber EU. 2010. A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychol. Sci. 21:86-92
72. Goldstein DG, Johnson EJ, Herrmann A, Heitmann M. 2008. Nudge your customers toward better choices. Harv. Bus. Rev. 86:99-105
73. Pichert D, Katsikopoulos KV. 2008. Green defaults: information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 28:63-73
74. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
75. John P, Cotterill S, Moseley A, Richardson L, Smith G, et al. 2011. Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think: Experimenting with Ways to Change Civic Behaviour. London: Bloomsbury Acad.
76. Johnson EJ, Shu SB, Dellaert BGC, Fox C, Goldstein DG, et al. 2012. Beyond nudges: tools of a choice architecture. Mark. Lett. 23:487-504
77. Cent. Res. Environ. Decis. 2009. The Psychology of Climate Change Communication: A Guide for Scientists, Journalists, Educators, Political Aides, and the Interested Public. New York: Columbia Univ. http://guide.cred.columbia.edu
78. Kirchhoff C, Lemos MC, Dessai S. 2013. Actionable knowledge for environmental decision making: broadening the usability of climate science. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38:393-414
79. Allcott H, Rogers TT. 2012. How long do treatment effects last? Persistence and durability of a descriptive norms intervention's effect on energy conservation. HKS Fac. Res. Work. Pap. Ser. RWP12-045, John F. Kennedy Sch. Gov., Harvard Univ. http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/9804492/RWP12-045-Rogers.pdf?sequence = 1
80. Howe PD, Markowitz EM, Lee TM, Ko C-Y, Leiserowitz A. 2013. Global perceptions of local temperature change. Nat. Clim. Change 3:352-56
81. Donner SD, McDaniels J. 2013. The influence of national temperature fluctuations on opinions about climate change in the U.S. since 1990. Clim. Change 118:537-50
82. Joireman J, Barnes Truelove H, Duell B. 2010. Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming. J. Environ. Psychol. 30:358-67
83. Hamilton LC, Stampone MD. 2013. Blowin' in the wind: short-termweather and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Weather Clim. Soc. 5:112-19
84. Borick CP, Rabe BG. 2012. Weather or not? Examining the impact of meteorological conditions on public opinion regarding climate change. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc. 2012
85. Egan PJ, Mullin M. 2012. Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans' perceptions about global warming. J. Polit. 74:796-809
86. Rudman LA, McLean MC, Bunzl M. 2013. When truth is personally inconvenient, attitudes change: the impact of extreme weather on implicit support for green politicians and explicit climate-change beliefs. Psychol. Sci. 24:2290-96
87. Trope Y, Liberman N. 2003. Temporal construal. Psychol. Rev. 110:403-21
88. Fujita K, Clark SL, Freitas AL. 2014. "Think globally, act locally": construal levels and environmentally relevant decision-making. In Encouraging Sustainable Behavior: Psychology and the Environment, ed. HCM van Trijp, pp. 87-107. New York: Psychology
89. Vallacher RR, Wegner DM. 1989. Levels of personal agency: individual variation in action identification. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 57:660-71
90. Trope Y, Liberman N. 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117:440-63
91. Weber EU. 2006. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Clim. Change 77:103-20
92. Weber EU. 2010. What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 1:332-42
93. Swim J, Clayton S, Doherty T, Gifford R, Howard G, et al. 2009. Psychology and global climate change: addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association's task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change. Am. Psychol. Assoc.,Washington, DC. http://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change.aspx
94. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF. 2006. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim. Change 77:73-95
95. Rayner S, Malone EL. 1997. Zen and the art of climate maintenance. Nature 390:332-34
96. Milfont TL. 2010. Global warming, climate change and human psychology. In Psychological Approaches to Sustainability: Current Trends in Theory, Research and Practice, ed. V Corral-Verdugo, CH Garcia-Cadena, M Frias-Armenta, pp. 19-42. New York: Nova Science
97. Nicolaij S, Hendrickx L. 2003. The influence of temporal distance of negative consequences on the evaluation of environmental risks. In Human Decision Making and Environmental Perception: Understanding and Assisting Human Decision Making in Real-Life Situations, ed. L Hendrickx, W Jager, L Steg, pp. 47-67. Groningen, Neth.: Univ. Groningen Press
98. Hardisty DJ, Weber EU. 2009. Discounting future green:money versus the environment. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 138:329-40
99. Ding D, Maibach EW, Zhao X, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A. 2011. Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nat. Clim. Change 1:462-66
100. Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Vaughan S. 2013. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nat. Clim. Change 3:399-404
101. Budescu DV, Por HH, Broomell SB. 2012. Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports. Clim. Change 113:181-200
102. Spence A, Pidgeon N. 2010. Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Glob. Environ. Change 20:656-67
103. Hart PS, Nisbet EC. 2012. Boomerang effects in science communication: how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun. Res. 39:701-23
104. White K, MacDonnell R, Dahl DW. 2011. It's the mind-set that matters: the role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. J. Mark. Res. 48:472-85
105. Rabinovich A, Morton TA, Postmes T, Verplanken B. 2009. Think global, act local: the effect of goal and mindset specificity on willingness to donate to an environmental organization. J. Environ. Psychol. 29:391-99
106. Fujita K, Eyal T, Chaiken S, Trope Y, Liberman N. 2008. Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44:562-72
107. Sherif M. 1965. The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Octagon
108. Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 58:1015-26
109. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18:429-34
110. Nolan JM, Schultz PW, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. 2008. Normative social influence is underdetected. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34:913-23
111. Schultz PW. 1999. Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: a field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 21:25-36
112. Krupka E, Weber RA. 2009. The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior. J. Econ. Psychol. 30:307-20
113. Cordano M, Welcomer S, Scherer RF, Pradenas L, Parada V. 2011. A cross-cultural assessment of three theories of pro-environmental behavior: a comparison between business students of Chile and the United States. Environ. Behav. 43:634-57
114. Smith JR, Louis WR, Terry DJ, Greenaway KH, Clarke MR, Cheng X. 2012. Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. J. Environ. Psychol. 32:353-61
115. Göckeritz S, Schultz PW, Rendon T, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. 2010. Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: themoderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40:514-23
116. Thøgersen J. 2008. Social norms and cooperation in real-life social dilemmas. J. Econ. Psychol. 29:458-72
117. McDonald RI, Fielding KS, Louis WR. 2013. Energizing and de-motivating effects of norm-conflict. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39:57-72
118. McDonald RI, Fielding KS, Louis WR. 2014. Conflicting norms highlight the need for action. Environ. Behav. 46:139-62
119. McDonald RI, Fielding KS, Louis WR. 2014. Conflicting social norms and community conservation compliance. J. Nat. Conserv. 22:212-16
120. Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Van den Bergh B. 2010. Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 98:392-404
121. Fritsche I, Jonas E, Kayser DN, Koranyi N. 2010. Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms. J. Environ. Psychol. 30:67-79
122. Robertson JL, Barling J. 2012. Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro-environmental behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 34:176-94
123. Grønhøj A, Thøgersen J. 2012. Action speaks louder than words: the effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents' pro-environmental behaviour. J. Econ. Psychol. 33:292-302
124. Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-48
125. Parks CD, Joireman J, Van Lange PAM. 2013. Cooperation, trust, and antagonism: how public goods are promoted. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 14:119-65
126. Van Lange PAM, Joireman J, Parks CD, Van Dijk E. 2013. The psychology of social dilemmas: a review. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 120:125-41
127. Balliet D, Parks C, Joireman J. 2009. Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analysis. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 12:533-47
128. Bogaert S, Boone C, Declerck C. 2008. Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 47:453-80
129. Fischbacher U, Gächter S. 2010. Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:541-56
130. Balliet D, Van Lange PAM. 2013. Trust, punishment, and cooperation across 18 societies: a meta-analysis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8:363-79
131. Balliet D. 2010. Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analytic review. J. Confl. Resolut. 54:39-57
132. Balliet D, Mulder LB, Van Lange PAM. 2011. Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 137:594-615
133. Bowles S. 2008. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine "the moral sentiments": evidence from economic experiments. Science 320:1605-9
134. Fuster A, Meier S. 2010. Another hidden cost of incentives: the detrimental effect on norm enforcement. Manag. Sci. 56:57-70
135. Chen X-P, Pillutla MM, Yao X. 2009. Unintended consequences of cooperation inducing and maintaining mechanisms in public goods dilemmas: sanctions and moral appeals. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 12:241-55
136. Carpenter J, Matthews PH. 2009. What norms trigger punishment? Exp. Econ. 12:272-88
137. Herrmann B, Thöni C, Gächter S. 2008. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319:1362-67
138. van Dijk E, de Kwaadsteniet EW, De Cremer D. 2009. Tacit coordination in social dilemmas: the importance of having a common understanding. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 96:665-78
139. Brucks WM, Van Lange PAM. 2008. No control, no drive: how noise may undermine conservation behavior in a commons dilemma. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 38:810-22
140. Joireman J, Posey DC, Truelove HB, Parks CD. 2009. The environmentalist who cried drought: reactions to repeated warnings about depleting resources under conditions of uncertainty. J. Environ. Psychol. 29:181-92
141. Milinski M, Sommerfeld RD, Krambeck H-J, Reed FA, Marotzke J. 2008. The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:2291-94
142. Barrett S, Dannenberg A. 2012. Climate negotiations under scientific uncertainty. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:17372-76
143. Jacquet J, Hagel K, Hauert C, Marotzke J, Röhl T, Milinski M. 2013. Intra- and intergenerational discounting in the climate game. Nat. Clim. Change 3:1025-28
144. Weber JM, Murnighan JK. 2008. Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 95:1340-53
145. Kerr NL, Rumble AC, Park ES, Ouwerkerk JW, Parks CD, et al. 2009. "How many bad apples does it take to spoil the whole barrel?": social exclusion and toleration for bad apples. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:603-13
146. De Cremer D, Van Knippenberg D, Van Dijk E, Van Leeuwen E. 2008. Cooperating if one's goals are collective-based: social identification effects in social dilemmas as a function of goal transformation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 38:1562-79
147. Jackson JW. 2008. Reactions to social dilemmas as a function of group identity, rational calculations, and social context. Small Group Res. 39:673-705
148. Jackson JW. 2011. Intragroup cooperation as a function of group performance and group identity. Group Dyn. Theory, Res. Pract. 15:343-56
149. Buchan NR, Brewer MB, Grimalda G,Wilson RK, Fatas E, Foddy M. 2011. Global social identity and global cooperation. Psychol. Sci. 22:821-28