Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports

Climatic Change

Volumn 113, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 181-200

  Budescu, David V ^a   Por, Han Hui ^a   Broomell, Stephen B ^b,c  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRENT MODE; EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGES; POLICY MAKERS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

COMMUNICATION;

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMUNICATION NETWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY MAKING; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84862129809     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0330-3     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bastardi A, Uhlmann EL, Ross L (2011) Wishful thinking: belief, desire, and the motivated evaluation of scientific evidence. Psychol Sci 22: 731-732.
2. Begley S (2007) The truth about denial. Newsweek 150: 20-29.
3. Beyth-Marom R (1982) How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions. J Forecast 1: 257-269.
4. Broomell S, Budescu DV, Por H (2009) Beliefs and actions: an analysis of the public's attitudes toward global climate change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Judgment and Decision Making, Boston.
5. Brun W, Teigen KH (1988) Verbal probabilities: ambiguous, context-dependent, or both? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 41: 390-414.
6. Bryant G, Norman G (1980) Expressions of probability: words and numbers. N Engl J Med 302: 411.
7. Budescu DV, Broomell SB, Por HH (2009) Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Psychol Sci 20: 299-308.
8. Budescu DV, Wallsten TS (1990) Dyadic decisions with numerical and verbal probabilities. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 46: 240-263.
9. Budescu DV, Wallsten TS (1985) Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 36: 391-405.
10. Budescu DV, Wallsten TS (1987) Subjective estimation of precise and vague uncertainties. In: Wright G, Ayton P (eds) Judgmental forecasting. Wiley, New York, pp 63-82.
11. Budescu DV, Weinberg S, Wallsten TS (1988) Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14: 281-294.
12. Budescu DV, Karelitz TM, Wallsten TS (2003) Predicting the directionality of probability words from their membership functions. J Behav Decis Mak 16: 159-180.
13. Chesley GR (1985) Interpretation of uncertainty expressions. Contemp Account Res 2: 179-199.
14. Clarke VA, Ruffin CL, Hill DJ, Beamen AL (1992) Ratings of orally presented verbal expressions of probability by a heterogeneous sample. J Appl Soc Psychol 22: 638-656.
15. Dhami MK, Wallsten TS (2005) Interpersonal comparison of subjective probabilities: toward translating linguistic probabilities. Mem Cognit 33: 1057-1068.
16. Erev I, Cohen BL (1990) Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 45: 1-18.
17. Erev I, Wallsten TS, Neal M (1991) Vagueness, ambiguity, and the cost of mutual understanding. Psychol Sci 2: 231-324.
18. illenbaum S, Wallsten TS, Cohen BL, Cox JA (1991) Some effects of vocabulary and communication task on the understanding and use of vague probability expressions. Am J Psychol 104: 35-60.
19. Fischer K, Jungermann H (1996) Rarely occurring headaches and rarely occurring blindness: is rarely = rarely? The meaning of verbal frequentistic labels in specific medical contexts. J Behav Decis Mak 9: 153-172.
20. Fischhoff B (1994) What forecasts (seem to) mean. Int J Forecast 10: 387-403.
21. Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J Econ Perspect 19(4): 25-42.
22. Fox CR, Irwin JR (1998) The role of context in the communication of uncertain beliefs. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 20: 57-70.
23. Hamm RM (1991) Selection of verbal probabilities: a solution for some problems of verbal probability expression. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 48: 193-223.
24. Heath Y, Gifford R (2006) Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: the case of belief in global climate change. Environ Behav 38: 48-71.
25. Ha-Duong M, Swart R, Bernstein L, Petersen R (2007) Uncertainty management in the IPCC: agreeing to disagree. Glob Environ Chang 17: 8-11.
26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001) Summary for policymakers: Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Retrieved July 2009 from http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/pdf/WG1_TAR-FRONT. pdf.
27. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005) Guidance notes for lead authors of the IPCC fourth assessment report on addressing uncertainties. Retrieved February 2011 from http://www. ipcc. ch/meetings/ar4-workshops-express-meetings/uncertainty-guidance-note. pdf.
28. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Summary for policymakers: contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Retrieved February 2007 from http://www. ipcc. ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm. pdf.
29. Johnson EM (1973) Numerical encoding of qualitative expressions of uncertainty (Technical paper No. 250). US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral & Social Sciences.
30. Karelitz TM, Budescu DV (2004) You say "Probable" and I say "Likely": improving interpersonal communication with verbal probability phrases. J Exp Psychol Appl 10: 25-41.
31. Klayman J, Ha Y (1987) Confirmation, disconfirmation and information in hypothesis testing. Psychol Rev 94: 211-228.
32. Kong A, Barnett GO, Mosteller F, Youtz C (1986) How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. N Engl J Med 315: 740-744.
33. Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull 180: 480-498.
34. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Hmielowski JD (2011) Politics global warming: Democrats, republicans, independents, and the tea party. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://environment. yale. edu/climate/files/PoliticsGlobalWarming2011. pdf.
35. Leiserowitz A, Smith N (2010) Knowledge of climate change across global warming's six Americas. Yale University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
36. Leiserowitz A, Smith N, Marlon JR (2010) Americans' knowledge of climate change. Yale University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://environment. yale. edu/climate/files/ClimateChangeKnowledge2010. pdf.
37. Lipkus IM (2007) Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions. Med Decis Making 27: 681-695.
38. Mapes REA (1979) Verbal and numerical estimates of probability terms. J Gen Intern Med 6: 237.
39. Mastrandea MD, Field CB, Stocker TF, Edenhofer O, Rbi KL, Frame DJ, Held H, Kreogler E, Mach KJ, Matschoss PR, Plattner GK, Yohee GW, Zwiers FW (2010) Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC fifth assessment report on consistent treatment of uncertainties. Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (Available at http://www. ipcc. ch).
40. Merz JF, Druzdzel MJ, Mazur DJ (1991) Verbal expressions of probability in informed consent litigation. J Med Decis Making 11: 273-281.
41. Mosteller F, Youtz C (1990) Quantifying probabilistic expressions. Stat Sci 5: 2-16.
42. Mullet E, Rivet I (1991) Comprehension of verbal probability expressions in children and adolescents. Lang Comm 11: 217-225.
43. Nakao M, Axelrod S (1983) Numbers are better than words: verbal specifications of frequency have no place in medicine. Am J Med 74: 1061.
44. Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2: 175-220.
45. Nobelprize. org (2008) The Nobel peace prize 2007. Retrieved November 2007 from http://nobelprize. org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2007/press. html.
46. Olson MJ, Budescu DV (1997) Patterns of preference for numerical and verbal probabilities. J Behav Decis Mak 10: 117-131.
47. Patt AG, Schrag DP (2003) Using specific language to describe risk and probability. Clim Chang 61: 17-30. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1026314523443.
48. Pepper S, Prytulak LS (1974) Sometimes frequently means seldom: context effects in the interpretation of quantitative expressions. J Res Personal 8: 95-101.
49. Peters E, Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Mazzocco K, Dickert S (2006) Numeracy and decision making. Psychol Sci 17: 407-413.
50. Pew Research Center for for the People and the Press (2009) Scientific achievements less prominent than a decade ago: public praise science; Scientists fault public, media. Retrieved Novermber 2009 from http://people-press. org/reports/pdf/528. pdf.
51. Piercey MD (2009) Motivated reasoning and verbal vs. numerical probability assessment: evidence from an accounting context. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 108: 330-341.
52. Pyszcynski T, Greenberg J (1987) Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inferences: a biased hypothesis testing model. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp 297-340.
53. Reagan R, Mosteller F, Youtz C (1989) Quantitative meanings of verbal probability expressions. J Appl Psychol 74: 433-442.
54. Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ (2007) The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learn Individ Differ 17: 147-159.
55. Smithson M, Budescu DV, Broomell SB, Por H (2011) Never say "Not:" impact of negative wording in probability phrases on imprecise probability judgments. Presented at 7th International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, Innsbruck, Austria.
56. Sterman JD (2011) Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Climatic Change. In press.
57. Sutherland HJ, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Sem F (1991) Communicating probabilistic information to cancer patients: is there "noise" on the line? Soc Sci Med 32: 725-731.
58. Teigen KH, Brun W (1999) The directionality of verbal probability expressions: effects on decisions, predictions and probabilistic reasoning. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 80: 155-190.
59. Wallsten TS, Budescu DV (1995) A review of human linguistic probability processing: general principles and empirical evidence. Knowl Eng Rev 10: 43-62.
60. Wallsten TS, Budescu DV, Zwick R, Kemp SM (1993) Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in numerical or verbal terms. Bull Psychon Soc 31: 135-138.
61. Wallsten TS, Fillenbaum S, Cox JA (1986) Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions. J Mem Lang 25: 571-587.
62. Weber EU, Hilton DJ (1990) Contextual effects in the interpretations of probability words: perceived base rate and severity of events. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16: 781-789.
63. Witteman C, Renooij S (2003) Evaluation of a verbal-numerical probability scale. Int J Approx Reason 33: 117-131.
64. Witteman C, Renooij S, Koele PM (2007) Medicine in words and numbers: a cross-sectional survey comparing probability assessment scales. BMC Med Informat Decis Making 7.
65. Zwick R, Wallsten TS (1989) Combining stochastic uncertainty and linguistic inexactness: theory and experimental evaluation of four fuzzy probability models. Int J Man Mach Stud 30: 69-111.