Boomerang Effects in Science Communication: How Motivated Reasoning and Identity Cues Amplify Opinion Polarization About Climate Mitigation Policies

Communication Research

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 701-723

  Hart, P Sol ^a   Nisbet, Erik C ^b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

boomerang effects; climate change; science communication; social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868114295     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650211416646     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bauer M. W.,Allum N.,Miller S.What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16 (1): 79-95.
2. Bennett W. L.,Iyengar S.A new era of minimal effects?.Journal of Communication. 2008;58:707-731.
3. Boykoff M. T.,Boykoff J. M.Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press.Global Environmental Change. 2004;14 (2): 125-136.
4. Boykoff M. T.,Boykoff J. M.Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage.Geoforum. 2007;38:1190-1204.
5. Brewer P. R.The shifting foundations of public opinion about gay rights.Journal of Politics. 2003;65:1208-1220.
6. BroderJ.(2009, June16). Government study warns of climate change effects. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/science/earth/16climate.html.
7. Byrne S.,Hart P. S.Communication Yearbook 33. Beck C., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2009:3-38.
8. ChhibberA.SchildA. (2009, October30). Melting mountains. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/31/opinion/31iht-edchhibber.html.
9. Converse P. E.Ideology and discontent. Apter D. E., ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 1964:206-261.
10. Cuddy A. J.,Rock M. S.,Norton M. I.Aid in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2007;10:107-118.
11. Dahlstrom M. F.The role of causality in information acceptance in narratives: An example from science communication.Communication Research. 2010;37:857-875.
12. Downs A.An economic theory of political action in a democracy.The Journal of Political Economy. 1957;65 (2): 135-150.
13. Dunlap R. E.,McCright A. M.A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change.Environment. 2008;50 (5): 26-35.
14. Druckman J. N.,Bolsen T.Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies.Journal of Communication.:.
15. Fiorina M. P.,Abrams S. J.Political polarization in the American public.Annual Review of Political Science. 2008;11:563-588.
16. Frumkin H.,Hess J.,Luber G.,Malilay J.,McGeehin M.Climate change: The public health response.American Journal of Public Health. 2008;98:435-445.
17. Goidel R. K.,Shields T.,Peffley M.Priming theory and RAS models: Toward an integrated perspective of media influence.American Politics Quarterly. 1997;25:287-318.
18. Gollust S. E.,Lantz P. M.,Ubel P.The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health.American Journal of Public Health. 2009;99:2160-2167.
19. Hamilton L. C.Education, politics, and opinions about climate change: Evidence for interaction effects.Climatic Change. 2011;104:231-242.
20. Hamilton L. C.,Keim B. D.Regional variation in perceptions about climate change.International Journal of Climatology. 2009;29:2348-2352.
21. Hamilton L. C.,Colocousis C. R.,Duncan C. M.Place effects on environmental views.Rural Sociology. 2010;75:326-347.
22. Hayes A. F.Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:.
23. Hutchings V. L.,Valentino N. A.The centrality of race in American politics.Annual Review of Political Science. 2004;7:383-408.
24. Hwang Y.,Southwell B. G.Science TV news exposure predicts science beliefs: Real world effects among a national sample.Communication Research. 2009;36:724-742.
25. Kiely R.,Bechhofer F.,Stewart R.,McCrone D.The markers and rules of Scottish national identity.Sociological Review. 2001;49 (1): 33-55.
26. Kinder D. R.,Sanders L. M.Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996:.
27. Kinder D. R.,Winter N.Exploring the racial divide: Blacks, Whites, and opinion on national policy.American Journal of Political Science. 2001;45:439-453.
28. Kogut T.,Ritov I.The "identified victim" effect: An identified group, or just a single individual?.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2005a;18:157-167.
29. Kogut T.,Ritov I.The singularity of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2005b;97:106-116.
30. Kunda Z.The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin. 1990;108:480-498.
31. Layman G. C.,Carsey T. M.,Horowitz J. M.Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences.Annual Review of Political Science. 2006;9:83-110.
32. Maibach E.,Roser-Renouf C.,Leiserowitz A.Communication and marketing as climate change intervention assets: A public health perspective.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;35:488-500.
33. Maibach E.,Nisbet M. C.,Baldwin P.,Akerlof K.,Diao G.Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions.BMC Public Health. 2010 299;10:.
34. Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Moser S. C.Dilling L., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
35. Mutz D.Red and blue nation?. Nivola P.Brady D., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2008:.
36. MydansS. (2009, September23). Vietnam finds itself vulnerable if sea rises. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/world/asia/24delta.html.
37. Nelson T. E.,Kinder D. R.Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion.Journal of Politics. 1996;58:1055-1078.
38. Nisbet M. C.The competition for worldviews: values, information, and public support for stem cell research.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2005;17 (1): 90-112.
39. Nisbet M. C.,Goidel R. K.Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: Bridging the ethnographic-survey research divide.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16:421-440.
40. Nisbet M. C.Communicating climate change: Why frames matter to public engagement.Environment. 2009a;51:514-518.
41. Nisbet M. C.Communicating science: New agendas in communication. Kahlor L.Stout P., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009b:40-67.
42. Nisbet M. C.,Scheufele D. A.What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions.American Journal of Botany. 2009;96:1767-1778.
43. Nisbet M. C.,Scheufele D. A.,Shanahan J.,Moy P.,Brossard D.,Lewenstein B. V.Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology.Communication Research. 2002;29:584-608.
44. Nyhan B.,Reifler J.When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions.Political Behavior. 2010;32:303-330.
45. O'Brien R. M.A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors.Quality and Quantity. 2007;41:673-690.
46. Parry M. L,Canziani O. F,Palutikof J. PTechnical summary. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Parry M. LCanziani O. FPalutikof J. Pvan der Linden P. JHanson C. E, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007:23-78.
47. Popkin S. L.The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991:.
48. Preacher K. J.,Rucker D. D.,Hayes A. F.Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2007;42:185-227.
49. Redlawsk D. P.Cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making.Journal of Politics. 2002;64:1021-1044.
50. Reich J. W.,Robertson J. L.Reactance and norm appeals in antilittering messages.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1979;9:91-101.
51. Schuldt J. P.,Konrath S. H.,Schwarz N."Global warming" or "climate change"? Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2011;75 (1): 115-124.
52. Schultz P. W.,Nolan J. M.,Cialdini R. B.,Goldstein N. J.,Grisevicius V.The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms.Psychological Science. 2007;18:429-434.
53. Slovic P."If I look at the mass I will never act": Psychic numbing and genocide.Judgment and Decision Making. 2007;2:1-17.
54. Small D. A.,Loewenstein G.,Slovic P.Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2007;102:143-153.
55. Sniderman P. M.,Brody R. A.,Tetlock P. E.Reasoning and choice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1991:.
56. Sullivan J. L.,Piereson J. E.,Marcus G. E.Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1982:.
57. Taber C. S.,Lodge M.Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50:755-769.
58. Weingart P.,Engels A.,Pansegrau P.Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media.Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9:261-283.
59. Wolburg J. M.College student's responses to antismoking messages: Denial, defiance, and other boomerang effects.Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2006;40:294-323.
60. Yaros R. A.Is it the medium or the message? Structuring complex news to enhance engagement and situational understanding by nonexperts.Communication Research. 2006;33:285-309.