Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies

Human Communication Research

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 184-207

  Banas, John A ^a   Miller, Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874696395     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hcre.12000     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77, 281-311. doi: 10.1080/03637751003758193.
2. Becker, S. W., Bevelas, A., & Braden, M. (1961). An index to measure contingency of English sentences. Language and Speech, 4, 138-154.
3. Brock, T. C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinant of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 269-309.
4. Burgoon, M., Cohen, M., Miller, M. D., & Montgomery, C. L. (1978). An empirical test of model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5, 27-39.
5. Chazan, R. (1996). European Jewry and the first crusade. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2005). Inoculation theory of resistance to influence at maturity: Recent progress in theory development and application and suggestions for future research. Communication Yearbook, 29, 97-145.
7. Dillard, J. P., & Meijnders, A. (2002). Persuasion and the structure of affect. In J. P. Dillard, & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 210-221.
9. Ghandour, R. (2006, October 3). No budget 9/11 doco breaks new ground online. The West Australian. Retrieved June 26, 2009, from Lexis-Nexis Academic database.
10. Goldzwig, S. (2002). Conspiracy rhetoric at the dawn of the new millennium: A response. Western Journal of Communication, 66, 492-506.
11. Grossman, L. (2006, September 3). Why the 9/11 conspiracy theories won't go away. Time. Retrieved June 26, 2009, from http://www.time.com/time/printout/0, 8816, 1531304, 00.html.
12. Hargrove, T. (2006, August 1). Third of Americans suspect 9-11 government conspiracy. Scripps Howard News Service. Retrieved April 7, 2008, from http://www.scrippsnews.com/911poll.
13. Hayes, C. (2006). 9/11: The roots of paranoia: Conspiracy theories and public mistrust. The Nation, 283, 11-13.
14. Hellinger, D. (2003). Paranoia, conspiracy, and hegemony in American politics. In H. G. West, & T. Sanders (Eds.), Transparency and conspiracy: Ethnographies of suspicion in the new world order (pp. 204-232). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15. Hofstadter, R. (1964, November). The paranoid style in American politics. Harper's Magazine, 77-86.
16. Howell, D. C. (2010). Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
17. Insko, C. A. (1967). Theories of attitude change. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
18. Jr Wyer, R. S. (1974). Cognitive organization and change: An information processing approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
19. Keeley, B. (1999). Of conspiracy theories author(s). The Journal of Philosophy, 96, 109-126.
20. Levine, T. R. (2011). Quantitative social science methods of inquiry. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Lindemann, K., & Renegar, V. (2006). Play, pleasure, and hypertext resistance: Internet conspiracy theory and "the real story" of United Airlines Flight 93. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Convention, San Antonio, TX.
22. Mason, F. (2002). A poor person's cognitive mapping. In P. Knight (Ed.), Conspiracy nation: The politics of paranoia in postwar America (pp. 40-56). New York, NY: New York University Press.
23. McCauley, C., & Jacques, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 637-644.
24. McGuire, W. J. (1961a). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24, 184-197.
25. McGuire, W. J. (1961b). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 326-332.
26. Melley, T. (2002). Agency, panic and the culture of conspiracy. In P. Knight (Ed.), Conspiracy nation: The politics of paranoia in postwar America (pp. 57-81). New York, NY: New York University Press.
27. Miller, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories: Public arguments as coded social critiques: A rhetorical analysis of the TWA fight 800 conspiracy theories. Argumentation and Advocacy, 39, 40-56. doi: 10.1177/0267323111433566.
28. Miller, C. H., Ivanov, B., Sims, J. D., Compton, J., Harrison, K. J., Parker, K. A., et al. (2013). Boosting the potency of resistance: Combining the motivational forces of inoculation and psychological reactance. Human Communication Research, 39, 127-155.
29. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external validity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.
30. Papageorgis, D., & McGuire, W. J. (1961). The generality of immunity to persuasion produced by pre-exposure to weakened counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 475-481. doi: 10.1037/h0048430.
31. Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., Kingsley Westerman, C. Y., Orfgen, T., & Foregger, S. (2007). The effects of argument quality and involvement type on attitude formation and attitude change: A test of dual-process and social judgment predictions. Human Communication Research, 33, 81-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00290.x.
32. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
33. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
34. Pfau, M. W. (2005). Evaluating conspiracy: Narrative, argument, and ideology in Lincoln's "House Divided" speech. Argumentation and Advocacy, 42, 57-73.
35. Pfau, M., Compton, J., Parker, K. A., Wittenberg, E. M., An, C., Ferguson, M., et al. (2004). The traditional explanation for resistance versus attitude accessibility: Do they trigger distinct or overlapping processes of resistance? Human Communication Research, 30, 329-360.
36. Pfau, M., Ivanov, B., Houston, B., Haigh, M., Sims, J., Gilchrist, E., et al. (2005). Inoculation and mental processing: The instrumental role of associative networks in the process of resistance to counterattitudinal influence. Communication Monographs, 72, 414-441. doi: 10.1080/03637750500322578.
37. Pfau, M., Semmler, S. M., Deatrick, L., Lane, L., Mason, A., Nisbett, G., et al. (2009). Nuances about the role and impact of affect and enhanced threat in inoculation. Communication Monographs, 76, 73-98.
38. Pfau, M., Szabo, E. A., Anderson, J., Morrill, J., Zubric, J., & Wan, H.-H. (2001). The role and impact of affect in the process of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 27, 216-252.
39. Pfau, M., Tusing, K. J., Lee, W., Godbold, L. C., Koerner, A., Penaloza, L. J., et al. (1997). Nuances in inoculation: The role of inoculation approach, ego-involvement, and message processing disposition in resistance. Communication Quarterly, 45, 461-481.
40. Sales, N. (2006, August). Click here for conspiracy. Vanity Fair. Retrieved June 26, 2009, from http://www.vanityfair.com/ontheweb/features/2006/08/loosechange200608.
41. Shermer, M. (1997). Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstitions, and other confusions of our time. New York, NY: Friedman.
42. Stempel, C., Hargrove, T., & Stempel, G. H., III (2007). Media use, social structure, and believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 353-372.
43. Szabo, E. A., & Pfau, M. (2002). Nuances in inoculation: Theory and applications. In J. P. Dillard, & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. Willman, S. (2002). Spinning paranoia: The ideology of conspiracy and contingency in post modern culture. In P. Knight (Ed.), Conspiracy nation: The politics of paranoia in postwar America (pp. 21-39). New York, NY: New York University Press.
46. Zogby International. (2004, August 30). Half of New Yorkers believe US leaders had foreknowledge of impending 9-11 attacks and "consciously failed" to act. Retrieved June 26, 2009, from http://www.zogby.com/search/readnews.cfm.