Examining conspiracist beliefs about the disappearance of amelia earhart

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 139, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 244-259

  Swami, Viren ^a   Furnham, Adrian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amelia Earhart; conspiracy theories; individual differences; monological belief system; personality

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FEMALE; HISTORY; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; POLITICS; SELF CONCEPT; UNITED KINGDOM; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; CULTURE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; POLITICS; SELF CONCEPT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866645904     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2012.697932     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637-647.
2. Bale, J. F. (2007). Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns in Prejudice, 41, 45-60.
3. Bass, R., Swank, H.,Waitt, T., Hyman K., Pilcher, L. D. (Producers), & Nair, M. (Director). Amelia [Motion picture]. United States: Fox Searchlight and Avalon Pictures.
4. Berg, S. (1988). Snowball sampling. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences vol. 8 (pp. 529-532). New York: Wiley.
5. Brink, R. (1994). Lost star: The search for Amelia Earhart. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
6. Butler, L. D., Koopman, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1995). The psychological impact of the film JFK. Political Psychology, 16, 237-257.
7. Butler, S. (1997). East to the dawn: The life of Amelia Earhart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Campbell, M., & Devine, T. E. (2002). With our own eyes: Eyewitnesses to the final days of Amelia Earhart. Lancaster, OH: Lucky Press.
9. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2006). Self-assessed intelligence and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 26, 769-779.
10. Citrin, J., & Elkins, D. J. (1975). Political disaffection among university students: Contents, measurements and causes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11. Clarke, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32, 131-150.
12. Coady, D. (Ed.) (2006). Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
13. Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories: The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation, and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1289-1293.
14. Davis, D. B. (1969). The slave power conspiracy and the paranoid style. Baton Rouge, FL: Louisiana State University Press.
15. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 210-222.
16. Edelman, M. (1985). The symbolic use of politics (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
17. Fleiss, J. K. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
18. Furnham, A., & Gasson, L. (1998). Sex differences in parental estimates of their children's intelligence. Sex Roles, 38, 151-162.
19. Gillespie, R. (2007). Finding Amelia: The true story of the Earhart disappearance. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
20. Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731-742.
21. Goldstein, D. M., & Dillon, K. V. (1997). Amelia: The centennial biography of an aviation pioneer. Washington, DC: Brassey.
22. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr.,W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
23. Hardin, R. (2002). The crippled epistemology of extremism. In A. Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salmon, & R. Wintrobe (Eds.), Political extremism and rationality (pp. 3-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Hofstadter, R. (1966). The paranoid style in American politics. In R. Hofstader (Ed.), The paranoid style in American politics and other essays (pp. 3-40). New York, NY:Knopf.
25. Inglehart, R. (1987). Extremist political positions and perceptions of conspiracy. In C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy (pp. 231-244). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
26. Kaase, M. (1971). Demokratische Einstellung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschlandd [Democratic opinions in Germany]. In R.Wildenman (Ed.), Sozialwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch fur Politik (Vol. 2). Munich, Germany: Gunter Olzog Verlag.
27. Keeley, B. L. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. Journal of Philosophy, 96, 109-126.
28. Keeley, B. L. (2006).Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! More thoughts on conspiracy theory. In D. Coady (Ed.), Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate (pp. 116-122). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
29. Kramer, R.M. (1994). The sinister attribution error. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 199-230.
30. Kramer, R. M. (1998). Paranoid cognition in social systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 251-275.
31. Lange, R., & Houran, J. (1998). Delusions of the paranormal: A haunting question of perception. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186, 637-645.
32. Lange, R., & Houran, J. (1999). The role of fear in delusions of the paranormal. Journal of Nernous and Mental Disease, 187, 158-166.
33. Leman, P. J. (2007, July). The born conspiracy. New Scientist, 35-37.
34. Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2007). A major event has a major cause: Evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychological Review, 9, 18-28.
35. Long, E. M., & Long, M. K. (1999). Amelia Earhart: The mystery solved. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
36. McHoskey, J. W. (1995). Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 395-409.
37. Melley, T. (2000). Empire of conspiracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38. Miller, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories: Public arguments as coded social critiques. Argumentation and Advocacy, 39, 40-56.
39. Morey, E. (1995). The importance of Amelia Earhart. San Diego, CA: Lucent Books.
40. Pearce, C. A. (1988). Amelia Earhart. New York, NY: Facts on File.
41. Pellegrino, A. H. (1971). World flight: The Amelia trail. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
42. Rich, D. L. (1989). Amelia Earhart: A biography.Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
43. Robins, R. S., & Post, J. M. (1997). Political paranoia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44. Robinson, J. P., & Shaver, P. R. (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
45. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Strippel, R. G. (1972). Amelia Earhart: The myth and the reality.NewYork, NY: Exposition Press.
47. Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202-227.
48. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 749-761.
49. Swami, V., & Coles, R. (2010). The truth is out there: Belief in conspiracy theories. The Psychologist, 23, 560-563.
50. Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443-463.
51. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). The method of paired comparisons for social values. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 21, 384-400.
52. Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529-554.
53. Ungerleider, J. T., & Wellisch,D.K. (1979). Coercive persuasion (brain-washing), religious cults, and deprogramming. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 279-282.
54. Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115-117.
55. Young, T. J. (1990). Cult violence and the identity movement. Cultic Studies Journal, 7, 150-159.
56. Zarefsky, D. (1984). Conspiracy arguments in the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 21, 63-75.