Functional and genomic context in pathway analysis of GWAS data

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 390-400

  Mooney, Michael A ^a   Nigg, Joel T ^b   McWeeney, Shannon K ^a,c   Wilmot, Beth ^a,c  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Oregon Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex traits; Gene set analysis; GWAS; Polygenic effects

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOMICS; HUMANS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84906821549     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 13624555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Hirschhorn J.N. Genomewide association studies - illuminating biologic pathways. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360:1699-1701.
2. Holmans P. Statistical methods for pathway analysis of genome-wide data for association with complex genetic traits. Adv. Genet. 2010, 72:141-179.
3. Wang K., et al. Analysing biological pathways in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:843-854.
4. Ramanan V.K., et al. Pathway analysis of genomic data: concepts, methods, and prospects for future development. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:323-332.
5. Fridley B.L., Biernacka J.M. Gene set analysis of SNP data: benefits, challenges, and future directions. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 19:837-843.
6. Cerami E.G., et al. Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D685-D690.
7. Kanehisa M., Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28:27-30.
8. Kanehisa M., et al. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:D199-D205.
9. Croft D., et al. The Reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:D472-D477.
10. Ashburner M., et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25:25-29.
11. Subramanian A., et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:15545-15550.
12. Schaefer C.F., et al. PID: the Pathway Interaction Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D674-D679.
13. Kamburov A., et al. ConsensusPathDB: toward a more complete picture of cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D712-D717.
14. Khatri P., et al. Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8:e1002375.
15. Jarvik J., Botstein D. A genetic method for determining the order of events in a biological pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1973, 70:2046-2050.
16. Mitrea C., et al. Methods and approaches in the topology-based analysis of biological pathways. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4:278.
17. Demir E., et al. The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:935-942.
18. Donato M., et al. Analysis and correction of crosstalk effects in pathway analysis. Genome Res. 2013, 23:1885-1893.
19. Bader G.D., et al. BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:248-250.
20. Salwinski L., et al. The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:D449-D451.
21. Kerrien S., et al. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D841-D846.
22. Licata L., et al. MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2012 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D857-D861.
23. Keshava Prasad T.S., et al. Human Protein Reference Database - 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D767-D772.
24. Jensen L.J., et al. STRING 8 - a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D412-D416.
25. Franceschini A., et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D808-D815.
26. Orchard S., et al. The minimum information required for reporting a molecular interaction experiment (MIMIx). Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25:894-898.
27. Poelmans G., et al. Integrated genome-wide association study findings: identification of a neurodevelopmental network for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 2011, 168:365-377.
28. Xu G., et al. Module detection in complex networks using integer optimisation. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 2010, 5:36.
29. Cowley M.J., et al. PINA v2.0: mining interactome modules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D862-D865.
30. Bakir-Gungor B., Sezerman O.U. A new methodology to associate SNPs with human diseases according to their pathway related context. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e26277.
31. Jia P., et al. dmGWAS: dense module searching for genome-wide association studies in protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:95-102.
32. Vandin F., et al. Algorithms for detecting significantly mutated pathways in cancer. J. Comput. Biol. 2011, 18:507-522.
33. National Biomarker Development Alliance Organization to promote biomarker development. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55:11N.
34. Estrada K., et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:491-501.
35. Wu D., Smyth G.K. Camera: a competitive gene set test accounting for inter-gene correlation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:e133.
36. De la Cruz O., et al. Gene, region and pathway level analyses in whole-genome studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 2010, 34:222-231.
37. Luo L., et al. Genome-wide gene and pathway analysis. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 18:1045-1053.
38. Biernacka J.M., et al. Use of the gamma method for self-contained gene-set analysis of SNP data. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 20:565-571.
39. Yu K., et al. Pathway analysis by adaptive combination of P-values. Genet. Epidemiol. 2009, 33:700-709.
40. Liu J.Z., et al. A versatile gene-based test for genome-wide association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 87:139-145.
41. Shahbaba B., et al. A pathway analysis method for genome-wide association studies. Stat. Med. 2012, 31:988-1000.
42. Chen L.S., et al. Insights into colon cancer etiology via a regularized approach to gene set analysis of GWAS data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 86:860-871.
43. Chen X., et al. Pathway-based analysis for genome-wide association studies using supervised principal components. Genet. Epidemiol. 2010, 34:716-724.
44. Evangelou M., et al. Two novel pathway analysis methods based on a hierarchical model. Bioinformatics 2014, 30:690-697.
45. Wang L., et al. An efficient hierarchical generalized linear mixed model for pathway analysis of genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:686-692.
46. Carbonetto P., Stephens M. Integrated enrichment analysis of variants and pathways in genome-wide association studies indicates central role for IL-2 signaling genes in type 1 diabetes, and cytokine signaling genes in Crohn's disease. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003770.
47. Pan Q., et al. A system-level pathway-phenotype association analysis using synthetic feature random forest. Genet. Epidemiol. 2014, 38:209-219.
48. Silver M., et al. Pathways-driven sparse regression identifies pathways and genes associated with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in two Asian cohorts. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003939.
49. de Las Heras J.I., et al. Tissue specificity in the nuclear envelope supports its functional complexity. Nucleus 2013, 4:460-477.
50. Bisson N., et al. Selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry reveals the dynamics of signaling through the GRB2 adaptor. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29:653-658.
51. Liu M., et al. Assembling cell context-specific gene sets: a case in cardiomyopathy. J. Integr. Bioinform. 2013, 10:234.
52. Lan A., et al. A context-sensitive framework for the analysis of human signalling pathways in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 2013, 29:i210-i216.
53. Schork A.J., et al. All SNPs are not created equal: genome-wide association studies reveal a consistent pattern of enrichment among functionally annotated SNPs. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003449.
54. Yaspan B.L., et al. Genetic analysis of biological pathway data through genomic randomization. Hum. Genet. 2011, 129:563-571.
55. Saccone S.F., et al. SPOT: a web-based tool for using biological databases to prioritize SNPs after a genome-wide association study. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:W201-W209.
56. Hong M.G., et al. Strategies and issues in the detection of pathway enrichment in genome-wide association studies. Hum. Genet. 2009, 126:289-301.
57. Holmans P., et al. Gene ontology analysis of GWA study data sets provides insights into the biology of bipolar disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 85:13-24.
58. Jia P., et al. A bias-reducing pathway enrichment analysis of genome-wide association data confirmed association of the MHC region with schizophrenia. J. Med. Genet. 2012, 49:96-103.
59. Cabrera C.P., et al. Uncovering networks from genome-wide association studies via circular genomic permutation. G3 (Bethesda) 2012, 2:1067-1075.
60. Efron B., Tibshirani R. On testing the significance of sets of genes. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2007, 1:107.
61. Li M.X., et al. HYST: a hybrid set-based test for genome-wide association studies, with application to protein-protein interaction-based association analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 91:478-488.
62. Li M.X., et al. GATES: a rapid and powerful gene-based association test using extended Simes procedure. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 88:283-293.
63. Chen L., et al. Prioritizing risk pathways: a novel association approach to searching for disease pathways fusing SNPs and pathways. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:237-242.
64. Nam D., et al. GSA-SNP: a general approach for gene set analysis of polymorphisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:W749-W754.
65. Park Y.S., et al. Pathway-PDT: a flexible pathway analysis tool for nuclear families. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14:267.
66. Wang J., et al. WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:W77-W83.
67. Zhang K., et al. i-GSEA4GWAS: a web server for identification of pathways/gene sets associated with traits by applying an improved gene set enrichment analysis to genome-wide association study. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:W90-W95.
68. Zhang K., et al. ICSNPathway: identify candidate causal SNPs and pathways from genome-wide association study by one analytical framework. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:W437-W443.
69. Wang K., et al. Diverse genome-wide association studies associate the IL12/IL23 pathway with Crohn Disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84:399-405.
70. Medina I., et al. Gene set-based analysis of polymorphisms: finding pathways or biological processes associated to traits in genome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:W340-W344.
71. Wang K., et al. Pathway-based approaches for analysis of genomewide association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81:1278-1283.
72. Segrè A.V., et al. Common inherited variation in mitochondrial genes is not enriched for associations with type 2 diabetes or related glycemic traits. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001058.
73. Purcell S., et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81:559-575.
74. Holden M., et al. GSEA-SNP: applying gene set enrichment analysis to SNP data from genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2784-2785.
75. Chai H.S., et al. GLOSSI: a method to assess the association of genetic loci-sets with complex diseases. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:102.
76. O'Dushlaine C., et al. The SNP ratio test: pathway analysis of genome-wide association datasets. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2762-2763.
77. Lee P.H., et al. INRICH: interval-based enrichment analysis for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:1797-1799.
78. McLean C.Y., et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:495-501.
79. Weng L., et al. SNP-based pathway enrichment analysis for genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:99.
80. Kofler R., Schlötterer C. Gowinda: unbiased analysis of gene set enrichment for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:2084-2085.
81. Araki H., et al. GeneSetDB: a comprehensive meta-database, statistical and visualisation framework for gene set analysis. FEBS Open Bio 2012, 2:76-82.
82. Jaffe A.E., et al. Gene set bagging for estimating the probability a statistically significant result will replicate. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14:360.
83. Braun R., Buetow K. Pathways of distinction analysis: a new technique for multi-SNP analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002101.
84. Büchel F., et al. Integrative pathway-based approach for genome-wide association studies: identification of new pathways for rheumatoid arthritis and type 1 diabetes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e78577.
85. Chen M., et al. Incorporating biological pathways via a Markov random field model in genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1001353.
86. Glaab E., et al. EnrichNet: network-based gene set enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:i451-i457.
87. Glaab E., et al. TopoGSA: network topological gene set analysis. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1271-1272.
88. Gu Z., et al. Centrality-based pathway enrichment: a systematic approach for finding significant pathways dominated by key genes. BMC Syst. Biol. 2012, 6:56.
89. Gu Z., Wang J. CePa: an R package for finding significant pathways weighted by multiple network centralities. Bioinformatics 2013, 29:658-660.
90. Farfán F., et al. THINK Back: KNowledge-based Interpretation of High Throughput data. BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13(Suppl. 2):S4.
91. Rossin E.J., et al. Proteins encoded in genomic regions associated with immune-mediated disease physically interact and suggest underlying biology. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1001273.
92. Raychaudhuri S., et al. Identifying relationships among genomic disease regions: predicting genes at pathogenic SNP associations and rare deletions. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000534.
93. Chen H., Sharp B.M. Content-rich biological network constructed by mining PubMed abstracts. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:147.
94. Väremo L., et al. Enriching the gene set analysis of genome-wide data by incorporating directionality of gene expression and combining statistical hypotheses and methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:4378-4391.