Incorporating biological pathways via a markov random field model in genome-wide association studies

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Chen, Min ^a   Cho, Judy ^b   Zhao, Hongyu ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MARKOV RANDOM FIELD; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROHN DISEASE; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROBABILITY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROHN DISEASE; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, GENETIC; PROBABILITY;

EID: 79955573495     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001353     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wang K, Li M, Bucan M, (2007) Pathway-based approaches for analysis of genomewide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 81: 1278-1283.
2. Peng G, Luo L, Siu H, Zhu Y, Hu P, et al. (2010) Gene and pathway-based second-wave analysis of genome-wide association studies. Eur J Hum Genet 18: 111-117.
3. Ballard DH, Cho J, Zhao H, (2010) Comparisons of multi-marker association methods to detect association between a candidate region and disease. Genet Epidemiol 34: 201-212.
4. Chun H, Ballard D, Cho J, Zhao H, (2011) Identification of association between disease and multiple markers within a candidate region via sparse partial least squares regression. Submitted.
5. Franke L, van Bakel H, Fokkens L, de Jong ED, Egmont-Petersen M, et al. (2006) Reconstruction of a functional human gene network, with an application for prioritizing positional candidate genes. Am J Hum Genet 78: 1011-1025.
6. Aerts S, Lambrechts D, Maity S, Loo PV, Coessens B, et al. (2006) Gene prioritization through genomic data fusion. Nat Biotechnol 24: 537-544.
7. Ma X, Lee H, Wang L, Sun F, (2007) CGI: a new approach for prioritizing genes by combining gene expression and protein-protein interaction data. Bioinformatics 23: 215-221.
8. Hutz JE, Kraja AT, McLeod HL, Province MA, (2008) Candid: a flexible method for prioritizing candidate genes for complex human traits. Genet Epidemiol 32: 779-790.
9. Köhler S, Bauer S, Horn D, Robinson PN, (2008) Walking the interactome for prioritization of candidate disease genes. Am J Hum Genet 82: 949-958.
10. Wu X, Jiang R, Zhang MQ, Li S, (2008) Network-based global inference of human disease genes. Mol Syst Biol 4: 189.
11. Saccone SF, Saccone NL, Swan GE, Madden PAF, Goate AM, et al. (2008) Systematic biological prioritization after a genome-wide association study: an application to nicotine dependence. Bioinformatics 24: 1805-1811.
12. Wei P, Pan W, (2008) Incorporating gene networks into statistical tests for genomic data via a spatially correlated mixture model. Bioinformatics 24: 404-411.
13. Wei Z, Li H, (2007) A Markov random field model for network-based analysis of genomic data. Bioinformatics 23: 1537-1544.
14. Li H, Wei Z, Maris JM, (2010) A hidden markov random field model for genome-wide association studies. Biostatistics 11: 139-150.
15. Duerr RH, Taylor KD, Brant SR, Rioux JD, Silverberg MS, et al. (2006) A genome-wide association study identifies IL23R as an inflammatory bowel disease genes. Science 314: 1461-1463.
16. Salomonis N, Hanspers K, Zambon AC, Vranizan K, Lawlor SC, et al. (2007) Genmapp 2: new features and resources for pathway analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 217.
17. Kanehisa M, Goto S, (2000) Kegg: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 27-30.
18. Kindermann R, Snell JL, (1980) Markov random fields and their applications. American Mathematical Society ISBN: 0-8218-3381-2.
19. Besag J, (1986) On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 48: 259-302.
20. Müller P, Parmigiani G, Robert C, Rousseau J, (2004) Optimal sample size for multiple testing: the case of gene expression microarrays. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99: 990-1001.
21. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y, (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 57: 289-300.
22. Barrett JC, Hansoul S, Nicolae DL, Cho JH, Duerr RH, et al. (2008) Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn's disease. Nat Genet 40: 955-962.
23. Besag J, (1972) Nearest-neighbour systems and the auto-logistic model for binary data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 34: 75-83.
24. Besag J, (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 36: 192-236.
25. Sartor RB, (2006) Mechanisms of disease: pathogenesis of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 3: 390-407.
26. Peeters M, Nevens H, Baert F, Hiele M, de Meyer AM, et al. (1996) Familial aggregation in Crohn's disease: increased age-adjusted risk and concordance in clinical characteristics. Gastroenterology 111: 597-603.
27. Gauderman WJ, Murcray C, Gilliland F, Conti DV, (2007) Testing association between disease and multiple SNPs in a candidate gene. Genet Epidemiol 31: 383-395.
28. Wang K, Abbott D, (2008) A principal components regression approach to multilocus genetic association studies. Genet Epidemiol 32: 108-118.
29. Ballard DH, (2009) Integration of Genomic Data to Identify Genes and Pathways Associated with Disease. Ph.D. thesis, Yale University.