Dynamic speech representations in the human temporal lobe

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 472-479

  Leonard, Matthew K ^a   Chang, Edward F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEURONS;

ABSTRACT REPRESENTATION; AUDITORY CORTEX; CONTEXT DEPENDENT; CONTEXTUAL MODULATION; DYNAMIC PATTERNS; INFORMATION REPRESENTATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS;

BRAIN;

AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; COGNITION; ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; REVIEW; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STIMULUS; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; NERVE TRACT; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITION; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 84906785600     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.001     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Wernicke C. Der Aphasische Symptomencomplex: Eine Psychologische Studie auf Anatomischer Basis 1874, Cohn.
2. Geschwind N. Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man 1974, Springer.
3. Formisano E., et al. Who" is saying "what"? Brain-based decoding of human voice and speech. Science 2008, 322:970-973.
4. Pasley B.N., et al. Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001251.
5. Bouchard K.E., et al. Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation. Nature 2013, 495:327-332.
6. Poeppel D., et al. Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:1071-1086.
7. Lerner Y., et al. Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:2906-2915.
8. DeWitt I., Rauschecker J.P. Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:E505-E514.
9. Leff A.P., et al. The cortical dynamics of intelligible speech. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:13209-13215.
10. Okada K., et al. Hierarchical organization of human auditory cortex: evidence from acoustic invariance in the response to intelligible speech. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2486-2495.
11. Price C.J. The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1191:62-88.
12. Scott B.H., et al. Transformation of temporal processing across auditory cortex of awake macaques. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 105:712-730.
13. Steinschneider M. Phonemic representations and categories. Neural Correlates of Auditory Cognition 2013, 151-191. Springer.
14. Chevillet M., et al. Functional correlates of the anterolateral processing hierarchy in human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:9345-9352.
15. Hackett T.A. Information flow in the auditory cortical network. Hear. Res. 2011, 271:133-146.
16. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:393-402.
17. Rauschecker J.P., Scott S.K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:718-724.
18. Saur D., et al. Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:18035-18040.
19. Hickok G., et al. Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 2011, 69:407-422.
20. Gow D.W. The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: a dual lexicon model of spoken language processing. Brain Lang. 2012, 121:273-288.
21. Davis M.H., Gaskell M.G. A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:3773-3800.
22. Bozic M., et al. Bihemispheric foundations for human speech comprehension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:17439-17444.
23. McGettigan C., Scott S.K. Cortical asymmetries in speech perception: what's wrong, what's right and what's left?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:269-276.
24. Evans S., et al. The pathways for intelligible speech: multivariate and univariate perspectives. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 10.1093/cercor/bht083.
25. Sharpee T.O., et al. Hierarchical representations in the auditory cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2011, 21:761-767.
26. Schreiner C.E., Winer J.A. Auditory cortex mapmaking: principles, projections, and plasticity. Neuron 2007, 56:356-365.
27. Nelken I. Processing of complex sounds in the auditory system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2008, 18:413-417.
28. Baumann S., et al. A unified framework for the organization of the primate auditory cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2013, 7:11.
29. Moerel M., et al. Processing of natural sounds in human auditory cortex: tonotopy, spectral tuning, and relation to voice sensitivity. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:14205-14216.
30. Bitterman Y., et al. Ultra-fine frequency tuning revealed in single neurons of human auditory cortex. Nature 2008, 451:197-201.
31. Griffiths T.D., et al. Direct recordings of pitch responses from human auditory cortex. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1128-1132.
32. Schönwiesner M., Zatorre R.J. Spectro-temporal modulation transfer function of single voxels in the human auditory cortex measured with high-resolution fMRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:14611-14616.
33. Brugge J.F., et al. Coding of repetitive transients by auditory cortex on Heschl's gyrus. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:2358-2374.
34. Moerel M., et al. Processing of natural sounds: characterization of multipeak spectral tuning in human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:11888-11898.
35. Steinschneider M., et al. Representation of speech in human auditory cortex: is it special?. Hear. Res. 2013, 305:57-73.
36. Crone N.E., et al. Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:565-582.
37. Steinschneider M., et al. Spectrotemporal analysis of evoked and induced electroencephalographic responses in primary auditory cortex (A1) of the awake monkey. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:610-625.
38. Ray S., Maunsell J.H. Different origins of gamma rhythm and high-gamma activity in macaque visual cortex. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1000610.
39. Mukamel R., et al. Coupling between neuronal firing, field potentials, and fMRI in human auditory cortex. Science 2005, 309:951-954.
40. Nourski K.V., et al. Coding of repetitive transients by auditory cortex on posterolateral superior temporal gyrus in humans: an intracranial electrophysiology study. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 109:1283-1295.
41. Nourski K.V., et al. Spectral organization of the human lateral superior temporal gyrus revealed by intracranial recordings. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24:340-352.
42. Mesgarani N., et al. Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science 2014, 343:1006-1010.
43. Scott S.K., et al. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000, 123:2400-2406.
44. Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:3423-3431.
45. Zaehle T., et al. Segmental processing in the human auditory dorsal stream. Brain Res. 2008, 1220:179-190.
46. Turkeltaub P.E., Branch Coslett H. Localization of sublexical speech perception components. Brain Lang. 2010, 114:1-15.
47. Rosen S., et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in speech perception: sense, nonsense and modulations. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e24672.
48. Takeichi H., et al. Comprehension of degraded speech sounds with m-sequence modulation: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2010, 49:2697-2706.
49. Travis K.E., et al. Independence of early speech processing from word meaning. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 23:2370-2379.
50. Obleser J., et al. Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:8116-8123.
51. Obleser J., et al. Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2283-2289.
52. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as "asymmetric sampling in time". Speech Commun. 2003, 41:245-255.
53. Steinschneider M., et al. Intracranial study of speech-elicited activity on the human posterolateral superior temporal gyrus. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21:2332-2347.
54. Chang E.F., et al. Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13:1428-1432.
55. Liebenthal E., et al. Specialization along the left superior temporal sulcus for auditory categorization. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2958-2970.
56. Tsunada J., et al. Representation of speech categories in the primate auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 105:2634-2646.
57. Zhang L., et al. Cortical dynamics of acoustic and phonological processing in speech perception. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e20963.
58. Joanisse M.F., et al. Brain mechanisms implicated in the preattentive categorization of speech sounds revealed using fMRI and a short-interval habituation trial paradigm. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2084-2093.
59. Zion Golumbic E.M., et al. Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party". Neuron 2013, 77:980-991.
60. Ding N., Simon J.Z. Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 107:78-89.
61. Ding N., Simon J.Z. Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:11854-11859.
62. Sabri M., et al. Attentional and linguistic interactions in speech perception. Neuroimage 2008, 39:1444-1456.
63. Kerlin J.R., et al. Attentional gain control of ongoing cortical speech representations in a "cocktail party". J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:620-628.
64. Mesgarani N., Chang E.F. Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception. Nature 2012, 485:233-236.
65. Peelle J.E., et al. Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23:1378-1387.
66. Wild C.J., et al. Human auditory cortex is sensitive to the perceived clarity of speech. Neuroimage 2012, 60:1490-1502.
67. Davis M.H., et al. Does semantic context benefit speech understanding through "top-down" processes? Evidence from time-resolved sparse fMRI. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:3914-3932.
68. Pallier C., et al. Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:2522-2527.
69. Sohoglu E., et al. Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:8443-8453.
70. Wolmetz M., et al. What does the right hemisphere know about phoneme categories?. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:552-569.
71. Leonard M.K., et al. Language proficiency modulates the recruitment of non-classical language areas in bilinguals. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18240.
72. Ylinen S., et al. Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second-language users of English. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:1319-1332.
73. Holt L.L., Lotto A.J. Speech perception within an auditory cognitive science framework. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 17:42-46.
74. Chait M., et al. Processing asymmetry of transitions between order and disorder in human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:5207-5214.
75. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cogn. Psychol. 1986, 18:1-86.
76. McQueen J.M., et al. Are there really interactive processes in speech perception?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:533.
77. McClelland J.L., et al. Are there interactive processes in speech perception?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:363-369.
78. Elman J.L. An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:301-306.
79. Elman J.L. On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cogn. Sci. 2009, 33:547-582.
80. Creel S.C., et al. Heeding the voice of experience: the role of talker variation in lexical access. Cognition 2008, 106:633-664.
81. Creel S.C., Bregman M.R. How talker identity relates to language processing. Lang. Linguist. Compass 2011, 5:190-204.
82. Kraljic T., Samuel A.G. Perceptual learning for speech: is there a return to normal?. Cogn. Psychol. 2005, 51:141-178.
83. Von Kriegstein K., et al. How the human brain recognizes speech in the context of changing speakers. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:629-638.
84. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 1987, 25:71-102.
85. Norris D., et al. Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary. Behav. Brain Sci. 2000, 23:299-325.
86. Gagnepain P., et al. Temporal predictive codes for spoken words in auditory cortex. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:615-621.
87. Prabhakaran R., et al. An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2209-2221.
88. Dahan D., et al. Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements. Cogn. Psychol. 2001, 42:317-367.
89. Whiting C.M., et al. Neural dynamics of inflectional and derivational processing in spoken word comprehension: laterality and automaticity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:759.
90. Lindsay S., et al. Acquiring novel words and their past tenses: evidence from lexical effects on phonetic categorisation. J. Mem. Lang. 2012, 66:210-225.
91. Shtyrov Y., et al. Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:16864-16867.
92. Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 2012, 36:181-204.
93. Yildiz I.B., et al. From birdsong to human speech recognition: Bayesian inference on a hierarchy of nonlinear dynamical systems. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9:e1003219.
94. Norris D., McQueen J.M. Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychol. Rev. 2008, 115:357.
95. Pouget A., et al. Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:1170-1178.
96. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:127-138.
97. Ulanovsky N., et al. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:391-398.
98. Yaron A., et al. Sensitivity to complex statistical regularities in rat auditory cortex. Neuron 2012, 76:603-615.
99. McQueen J.M., Huettig F. Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012, 131:509.