Processing asymmetry of transitions between order and disorder in human auditory cortex

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 27, Issue 19, 2007, Pages 5207-5214

  Chait, Maria ^a,b,e   Poeppel, David ^a,b   De Cheveigné, Alain ^d,e   Simon, Jonathan Z ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^e ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Auditory evoked response; Change detection; Integration window; M100; M50; Magnetoencephalography; MMN; Scene analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE NET; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 34248395966     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 02706474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0318-07.2007     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adachi Y, Shimogawara M, Higuchi M, Haruta Y, Ochiai M (2001) Reduction of nonperiodic environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method. IEEE Trans Appl Superconduct 11:669-672.
2. Chait M, Poeppel D, de Cheveigne' A, Simon JZ (2005) Human auditory cortical processing of changes in interaural correlation. J Neurosci 25:8518-8527.
3. Chait M, Poeppel D, Simon JZ (2006) Neural response correlates of detection of monaurally and binaurally created pitches in humans. Cereb Cortex 16:835-848.
4. Dean I, Harper NS, McAlpine D (2005) Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics. Nat Neurosci 8:1684-1689.
5. DeWeese M, Zador A (1998) Asymmetric dynamics in optimal variance adaptation. Neural Comput 10:1179-1202.
6. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.
7. Durlach NI (1963) Equalization and cancellation theory of binaural masking-level differences. J Acoust Soc Am 35:1206-1218.
8. Gage N, Roberts TP, Hickok G (2006) Temporal resolution properties of human auditory cortex: reflections in the neuromagnetic auditory evoked M100 component. Brain Res 1069:166-171.
9. Gage NM, Roberts TP (2000) Temporal integration: reflections in the M100 of the auditory evoked field. NeuroReport 11:2723-2726.
10. Gutschalk A, Patterson RD, Scherg M, Uppenkamp S, Rupp A (2004) Temporal dynamics of pitch in human auditory cortex. NeuroImage 22:755-766.
11. Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV (1993) Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 65:413-497.
12. Hari R (1990) The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex. In: Auditory evoked magnetic fields and the electric potentials (Grandori F, Hoke M, Romani G, eds), pp 222-282. Basel: Krager-Verlag.
13. Jones SJ (2002) The internal auditory clock: what can evoked potentials reveal about the analysis of temporal sound patterns, and abnormal states of consciousness? Neurophysiol Clin 32:241-253.
14. Jones SJ, Perez N (2002) The auditory C-process of spectral profile analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1558-1565.
15. Kaernbach C, Schroger E, Gunter TC (1998) Human event-related brain potentials to auditory periodic noise stimuli. Neurosci Lett 242:17-20.
16. Krumbholz K, Patterson RD, Seither-Preisler A, Lammertmann C, Lütkenho ̈ner B (2003) Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. Cereb Cortex 13:765-772.
17. Kujala A, Näätänen R (2003) Auditory environment and change detection as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN). In: Detection of change: event related potential and fMRI findings (Polich J, ed), pp 1-22. Boston: Kluwer.
18. Lavikainen J, Huotilainen M, Ilmoniemi RJ, Simola JT, Näätänen R (1995) Pitch change of a continuous tone activates two distinct processes in human auditory cortex: a study with whole-head magnetometer. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96:93-96.
19. Lütkenhöner B (2003) Magnetoencephalography and its Achilles' heel. J Physiol (Paris) 97:641-658.
20. Lütkenhöner B, Steinsträter O (1998) High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol 3:191-213.
21. Martin BA, Boothroyd A (2000) Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 107:2155-2161.
22. Moore BC, Glasberg BR (1983) Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. J Acoust. Soc Am 74:750-753.
23. Näätänen R (1992) Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Näätänen R, Picton T (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24:375-425.
24. Näätänen R, Gaillard AWK, Mäntysalo S (1978) Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica 42:313-329.
25. Nunez PL, Silberstein RB (2000) On the relationship of synaptic activity to macroscopic measurements: does co-registration of EEG with fMRI make sense? Brain Topogr 13:79-96.
26. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113.
27. Pantev C, Bertrand O, Eulitz C, Verkindt C, Hampson S, Schuierer G, Elbert T (1995) Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94:26-40.
28. Plack CJ, Moore BCJ (1990) Temporal window shape as a function of frequency and level. J Acoust Soc Am 87:2178-2187.
29. Poeppel D (2003) The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as "asymmetric sampling in time." Speech Commun 41:245-255.
30. Polich J (2003) Detection of change: event related potential and fMRI findings. Boston: Kluwer.
31. Roberts T, Ferrari P, Stufflebeam S, Poeppel D (2000) Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: stimulus dependence and insights towards perception. J Clin Neuropsychol 17:114-129.
32. Rupp A, Uppenkamp S, Bailes J, Gutschalk A, Patterson RD (2005) Time constants in temporal pitch extraction: a comparison of psychophysical and magnetic data. In: Auditory signal processing: physiology, psychoacoustics, and models (Pressnitzer D, de Cheveigné A, McAdams S, Collet L, eds), pp 119-125. New York: Springer.
33. Sams M, Hari R, Rif J, Knuutila J (1993) The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10s: neuromagnetic evidence. J Cog Neurosci 5:363-370.
34. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I (2003) Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci 6:391-398.
35. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I (2004) Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J Neurosci 24:10440-10453.
36. Wang X, Lu T, Liang L (2003) Cortical processing of temporal modulations. Speech Commun 41:107-121.
37. Winkler I (2003) Change detection in complex auditory environment: beyond the oddball paradigm. In: Detection of change: event related potential and fMRI findings (Polich J, ed), pp 61-82. Boston: Kluwer.
38. Winkler I, Karmos G, Näätänen R (1996) Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity eventrelated potential. Brain Res 742:239-252.
39. Yost WA, Mapes-Riordan D, Shofner W, Dye R, Sheft S (2005) Pitch strength of regular-interval click trains with different length "runs" of regular intervals. J Acoust Soc Am 117:3054-3068.